Does anyone know of a VPN that has a feature that lets you exclude certain websites/URLs from being affected by the VPN connection? I used to use TunnelBear and it had this feature, but got removed.
Tried asking on plebbit r/VPN and those nazi modding faggots delete your post if you ask for recommendations... unless on Monday or Friday... in a specified fucking thread.
>>57332341
>Tunnelbear
>trusting the shillings of Linus Jew Tips
>getting a vpn based in a nsa five spying eyes nation
You are hopeless. You are not anonymous. Think for yourself stop being a sheep. There is a google doc with a huge list of vpn's including their stance on tos and technologies. Currently I have a year of Airvpn. Cryptostorm was considered.
I have a friend in the pirate party and am planning on getting my own end point vpn server. It will be untouchable.
>>57332464
lmao what
Took me a while to figure out you were claiming I use TunnelBear because I'm some sheep follower of YouTuber - who I just had to Google.
Should I go with AirVPN then? All I gotta do is delete TunnelBear? They can't still track me, can they?
What are the "NSA 5 Spying Eyes Nations" you're talking about?
>>57332464
Just did some quick research and even Air VPN, which is based in Italy, is among one of the "14 eyes" countries.
My backup has been Express VPN and seems like that's based in Virgin Islands..
I plan on setting up a vpn on my raspberry pi. I'm not too bothered by security, I just don't want to use public networks openly.
Any recommendations on using either purevpn or openvpn?
>>57332930
Openvpn uses blowfish by default. Make sure you change that to AES-256, and use TLS auth as well.
Google it.
>>57333057
Thanks, that should help me decide between open and pure vpn.
>>57332464
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pbIlqCLRwBk