USB3.0 can already do 5GBit/s 3.1 can do 10GBit/s
Regular type A connectors are pretty small, type C are even smaller
why is Ethernet still so huge to get even 1GBit/s, sometimes only 100MBit/s?
It does it over 100 meters
>>57295977
Are you an idiot?
>>57295977
About the connector size, it's for servers and not iPads. Nobody cares.
Ethernet is a standard, not a type of cable.
CAT6E does 10Gbps
>>57295977
>usb 3
>5Gbit/s
wrong.
>>57295977
Fiber is pretty small, family.
>>57296049
CAT6A. You can get away with 5e for 10GbE over very short runs, and CAT6 up to 55m, I believe.
>>57295977
Digerati such as myself, and old /g/, are able to make their own network cables. Summer uses prefabbed shit.
Network cables are therefore a form of Aposematism
>>57296195
>he doesn't just collect path cables whenever he sees one unattended.
>>57295977
Easy.
It's cheap as shit. It carries no significant voltage.
It goes 50+ meters with no assisted power.
Go google bootleg USB3.1 cables see what they do.
>>57295993
/ thread
>>57296515
syntax error
>>57295977
The cables and connectors aren't designed for Large speeds on small lengths.
They are designed to create stable connections over large distances.
Want to compare a 100 meter USB cable to a 100 meter Network cable?
>>57296588
Kek