It's unreal, guys. Seriously, I'm thinking of dropping

>>57278456
>I'm thinking of dropping the Verge from my routine reads.
Retard.

>>57278456
>reading the Verge
kys

>>57278456

whats so bad about showing your excitement for technology?

>>57278479
Louis Rossman once explained this perfectly:

it comes to this, if you love a company, then you shouldn't apologise for the shit they come up with, you should criticize them instead, in hope that they will make it better next time.

this way instead of ending up with a shit product that you(the fan boy), but nobody else will be happy with, you could end up with a genuinely good product.

>>57278479
It feels false, they exacerbate any minor accomplishment by Apple and downplay its flaws, any accomplishment by anyone else is either a copy or irrelevant.

>>57278456
>he reads the verge
you are the only one to blame here

One of their writers was working for Apple while working for them.

Look it up.

>>57279043
>>57278473
>>57278456
wtf is the verge?

>>57278521
>tfw Nintendo fan ready for disappointment again

>>57279073
> http://www.theverge.com/2016/9/23/13036012/a-note-from-the-editor-in-chief-about-chris-ziegler

>>57279085
Apple shills

>>57278456
>bendgate damage control
>obese Americans sitting on their iPhones thus breaking them was somehow a problem

>>57278521
>if you love a company [...] you should criticize them
No, if you love a company you should kill yourself. Completely serious.

>>57279283
>we've investigated our possible journalistic ethics violation and found we're not guilty
shocker