>linux is designed with security in mind
>firewall disabled by default on many distributions
>>57258634
-2/10
>>57258634
>>linux is designed with security in mind
[citation needed]
>>57258634
>linux is designed with security in mind
Most linux distributions have more privilege escalation exploits than all other operating systems combined. Theo is right, Linux is shit.
>>57258691
>Theo is right, Linux is shit.
well, he is right, but sadly it's still better than all of the other shit combined.
"Linux is insecure" is the hot new meme on /g/?
>>57258691
>Most linux distributions have more privilege escalation exploits than all other operating systems combined
[citation needed]
>Theo is right
Literally who?
>Linux is shit.
Your own opinion and thus lacks any real value.
>>57258634
If you found out about Linux you should also find out how to enable the fucking firewall, retard
>>57258724
Hopefully. It would be nice if /g/ got a taste of reality.
>>57258691
lmao
>>57258634
"Linux is insecure" is the hot new meme on /g/?
>>57258736
If you don't know who Theo is you shouldn't be posting here.
>>57258754
literally who
>>57258746
>reality
meme*
>>57258748
Resorting to posting the nonsensical debunked rants of some feminist faggot that Theo told to fuck off. Pretty pathetic.
>>57258634
>Not using GNU Hurd
>>57258634
>mom how to enable firewall
>>57258778
So mad
BSD = insecure garbage
>>57258778
Tell theo to suck my thobbing cock
>>57258691
Oh yeah, let's bring up the one type of exploit openBSD doesn't give a fuck about, and then say openBSD fags were right. Brilliant.
LOCAL
ROOT
EXPLOITS
DO
NOT
MATTER
IF WINDOWS HAD NOTHING BUT THEM IT WOULD BE MY MAIN OPERATING SYSTEM
IF YOU HAVE INSECURE USERLAND OR REMOTE ACCESS EXPLOITS THAT ALLOW LOCAL ROOT TO BE USED, ROOT IS THE LEAST OF YOUR PROBLEMS. YOU HAVE ROOTKITS INSTEAD OF ROOT SHELLS, RETARD.
Who is this ebin haxor "theo"
>>57258798
he's the founder of reddit.
Theo de reddit
>>57258798
a shitlord who doesn't think unix boxes should run bloated software or have a gorillion untrusted users that need to be "mitigated" in the first place
damn that luddite
>>57258787
Ubuntu over ~3200 emergency CVEs this year.
Arch over ~3800 emergency CVEs this year.
Windows ~170 emergency CVEs this year.
OpenBSD 2 emergency CVEs this year and they were both in shitty Linux programs nobody installs.
>>57258813
>No software
>Still gets CVE
lmfao
>>57258797
Linux doesn't have a good track record with remote exploits either though. The average Linux distribution is much worse than modern Windows in this regard.
>>57258813
Uh oh
>>57258829
Cool blog
>>57258835
That only shows the Linux kernel itself, not the distros.
>>57258829
Windows is worse than linux in that regard, but if linux is still too much for you, you should avoid using GNU software. For one heartbleed affecting a few versions of openSSL that sane persons (aka not debian users) were no longer using, there were three remotely exploitable major ganootlshit bugs that affected newer versions, and then that thing with bash's incompetently written parser that affected all versions...
>>57258864
Linux is a kernel. It's your choice what software you install
>>57258867
>too 1337 for GNU
>uses wangblows anyway
>>57258867
Windows 8+ is much, much better than most Linux distributions in terms of security. Most popular Linux distributions don't even use a secure implementation of ASLR.
>>57258889
OpenBSD doesn't even have MAC and jails
Why doesn't Linux just implement the grsecurity patch by default? It would make Linux as a whole much more secure.
>>57258835
Thread killing post coming through.
winfags got cucked as usual.
>>57258913
OpenBSD 6 has both and jails have been easy to get since at least OpenBSD 4.
>>57258917
>grsecurity patch
Makes system unstable, reason why BSD crashes every now and then
>>57258930
Oh? I thout OpenBSD cucks were defending the fact that it lacks MAC
welcome to the last decade
>>57258930
Now cry:
>WAAAAAAA Not enabled by default
>>57258917
Because the grsecurity people don't want to play by Linux's rules.
They tried to do a massive pull request a few years ago and were told to fuck off because they didn't want to follow standard procedure. And no, you can't seriously expect anyone to dissect your pull request when you don't even bother to document it yourself.
So, when they stop being asshats, it will maybe get mainlined. Doubt it though.
>>57258724
There have been an influx of shills ever since win10 adoption has been dropping off
>>57259059
>>57258917
I thought they did get a few things in mainline recently? Not the whole patch but better than nothing.
>>57258813
Glad I use windows.
Feels safe man.
>>57258754
>Putting a dude on this high a pedestal.
What's next, you'll eat his shit and call people who don't plebs?
>>57258813
Obvious bullshit stats pulled out of thin air.
Linux is level3. You are the internet.