Why aren't you using Windows Server 2012 R2 as your desktop OS, /g/?
>server tier performance
>no bloatware
>no botnet (no cortana)
>supports up to 4 TB of internal memory
>up to 64 10-core processors = 640 cores
>desktop is default interface
>boots way faster than any other windows
>stability that makes Linux users question their faith
Because I don't have terabytes of memory or a gazillion cores and I didn't install cortana like a fucking retard.
>>57145555
>>no botnet
Fucking waste of good quads...
but can it play games? if not i might as well just run linux cause even that can play some games
>>57145555
solid os but it still has botnet stuff
>>57145883
this. but the os will run on almost anything semi-modern
>>57145902
it has bits of botnet
>>57145919
yes you can play games
-
aside from all this 2008 r2 is still the better server os from pajeetsoft,
>>57145919
>but can it play games?
Of course it can, it's Windows.
>>57145555
>desktop is default interface
no it's not
>>57145969
What botnet does it have? Curious
>>57145989
all that spying shit that came with windows 10 upgrade -- that pajeetsoft implemented to windows 7, plus telemetry, and cip. also the ancient public key aka _NSAKEY
>>57146013
>all that spying shit that came with windows 10 upgrade
This?
https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/sbs/2016/01/22/windows-10-feature-upgrade-breaks-client-connector-for-window-server-2012-r2-essentials-windows-server-2012-essentials-and-windows-small-business-server-2011-essentials/
>>57145555
>made by Microsoft
I'd rather not
>$700 OS
>supports terabytes of RAM you don't have
>supports multiple CPUs you don't have
>tons of missing desktop features
>"why aren't you guys using this"
kys
>>57145555
because Bluetooth doesn't work with it. Also because muh botnet.
>>57146208
>$700
>buying Windows
Spotted the retard.
>>57146064
>https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/sbs/2016/01/22/windows-10-feature-upgrade-breaks-client-connector-for-window-server-2012-r2-essentials-windows-server-2012-essentials-and-windows-small-business-server-2011-essentials/
part of it, yes
>>57146381
>pirating your OS instead of using a free, superior alternative
Sure I'm the retard?
>>57145555
>>supports up to 4 TB of internal memory
>>up to 64 10-core processors = 640 cores
And I was just starting to think that buying a $20,000 computer was a mistake.
>>57145555
"server tier performance"
"stability that makes linux users question their faith"
>>57146929
naw nigga stop right there the server os lines of windows are super stable i will give them that is ran server 2012 on failing hardware and it never blue screened, ran win 7, 8.1 on same hardware
>oops something went wrong :(
>>57146208
>kys
oh PLEASE fuck off, you sound like an edgy teenager