>write an """""""AI""""""""

>>57138922
is "Assistant" some walmart knockoff of Siri?

>>57140040
He's referring to Google Assistant, the rebranded voice search that's only offered on the Pixel.

>>57140040
No, it's actually useful and isn't a huge steaming pile of shit seeing as Google actually has a competent AI/ML group unlike Apple.

>>57138922
It's not shilling the opposition, it is just giving answers based on the most likely solution to the question, which means that the majority of iPhone users are retarded.

>>57138922
>calling a voice search and Microsoft Sam tool an "AI"
>buying into the AI meme on either side
>fueling large corporations on their never-ending quest to enslave all of us
>wanting computers that displace human labor without any way of employing them again
Don't even lie to yourselves, Siri and Google Now are just voice activated LMGTFY apps, along with a few on-device automations here and there.

>>57141822
>unironically defending an "I'm feeling lucky" fallback for such a simple query
neck yourself, Rajesh

>>57141822
For an "AI" it should know the context as it should in other conversations with it.

Nothing new really, it just tries to give you the most relavent results.

Remember when you could ask siri what the best phone was , and siri would return with Nokia

https://www.cnet.com/news/siri-says-nokia-lumia-900-the-best-smartphone-ever/

>>57144037
And a voice assistant in the year 2016 that's being branded as an """AI""" is allowed to base everything on most relevant google searches instead of context?