https://github.com/JonathanSalwan/T riton does /g/ do any l

File: 1443377708131.jpg (306KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

306KB, 1280x960px

slightly shameful self bumpppppppp

>>57115768
Hint: don't bother discussing anything interesting in /g/

https://reddit.com/r/ReverseEngineering/

File: 1450479925266.gif (130KB, 437x430px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 437x430px

>>57115831
yea, well ive seen a few good thread on /g/ before about things related to software security, just gotta hope to get some people in here

Retired reverser here.

Didn't actually do a lot of exploit discovery or development. Most of those are initially found via fuzzing these days. There were some adversarial (black box) audits however those were rare.

My clients were far more frequently not the creators of what I was working on: if source were available, they probably wouldn't have been contracting a reverse-engineer at my rates!

Of course that may be the direction the field is taking more recently. Many software reversers in the security arena had a focus on malware and worked for antivirus labs, or for firms in similar arenas.

I worked with some great people in the hardware side.

File: gucci sauce.jpg (78KB, 720x720px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 720x720px

>>57116021
Interesting stuff. To my understanding most of vulnerability research these days is all about satisfiability. Any insights into the world of satisfiability? or even fuzzing for that matter?