>mfw people post freedoms-respecting reaction images of Richard Stallman here without honouring the license terms of the botnet-free license
Please remember to respect the artists who respect your freedoms.
Photo by Anders Brenna [CC BY 3.0 no (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/no/deed.en)], via Wikimedia Commons
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ARichard_Stallman_by_Anders_Brenna_01.jpg
>>57101132
But stealing is free as in free.
>>57101132
NERD
>>57101167
You already have permission to repost them; literally all you have to do is copy and paste the attribution. Is that really so much to ask?
>>57101177
There's nothing nerdy about following the law.
Photo by D'Arcy Norman from Calgary, Canada (RMS@Ucalgary - 10) [CC BY 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AD-Arcy_Norman_-_RMS-Ucalgary_-_10_(by).jpg
>>57101208
>Is that really so much to ask?
Yes. Why can't you respect my freedoms?
>>57101230
>this is /g/ now
Photo by Heiko S [CC BY 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ARichard_Stallman_(2).jpg
But am i free to modify and redistribute my Richard Stallman reaction faces?
>>57102640
Yes, read the license terms and see what's allowed.
>>57101266
>didn't even make it the SA version
I can now take this image, modify one pixel, and it's now Closed Sores :^)
>>57102700
You'd still have to give credit to the original, and since your one-pixel modification doesn't add anything substantial to the work, it won't be considered a separate entity, and your plan won't work.
Anders Brenna [CC BY 3.0 no (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/no/deed.en)], via Wikimedia Commons
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ARichard_Stallman_by_Anders_Brenna_05.jpg
>>57102700
>Photo by D'Arcy Norman from Calgary, Canada (RMS@Ucalgary - 10) [CC BY 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons
>https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AD-Arcy_Norman_-_RMS-Ucalgary_-_10_(by).jpg
Would embedding the licencing info as exif be concidered enough?
>>57103860
The credit has to be "reasonable to the medium," so probably not, especially since 4chan strips exif data.