>competition drives innovation >"I only buy intel"

>>57097432
Competition doesn't mean charity.

If you have nothing to offer over your competitors, you will go bankrupt, even if your competitor are only slightly better. People won't buy your shit just because maybe one day you will improve.

Intel has competition. It's called ARM.

>>57097432

Compete with noone not even yourself - me

>>57097464
I am more than happy with AMD's price-performance ratio. This is why I choose AMD.

>>57097525
x86 is amd not intel's

>>57097614
x86 is dying just like AMD

>>57097642
>dying

it proven to be better at arm at the same wattage you fag

>>57097432
It's not the consumer's job to make a company competitive. The fact AMD hasn't made anything I find worth buying in nearly a decade is their fault.

I for one am hoping that Zen can change that, but I'm not holding my breath.

I don't spend money on a CPU willy-nilly, if im getting one it has to be a pretty good one at the time of purchase. It just so happens that Intel offers the better stuff right now. When Athlon X2 came out, that's the one i got at the time. Problem is, AMD often lags behind Intel so you get people developing irrational brand-loyalty over Intel CPUs.

On the GPU front, right now i'm inclined towards AMD as their cards are a bit more Linux and opensource-friendly than Nvidia's. RX480 is lookin pretty good too.

>>57097642
No it isn't.

I bough a 2500k when it was the new cool thing back then before that I had a monster Phenom II system and since then AMD hasn't had anything really good come out I'd honestly rather a Phenom II again LOL.

>buy amd
>amd creates a unitary monopoly because it makes cpus and gpus
>amd literally pushes out nvidia and intel because it makes their cpus work only with appropriate amd gpus
intel fucking told you guys, now intel is the best choice logically (because it`s better) and fanboyically (because it will be better)