>GS7 >fingerprint security >nobody's getting into

your fault for having facebook

>>57093854
fpbp

>>57093787
>falling for the fingerprint "security" meme

your own fault faggot

>>57093787
>Being retarded enough to actually pass out drunk at a party

>>57093787
>>fingerprint security
>>nobody's getting into my phone hurrrrr
said no one intelligent ever

>>57094290
>>Being retarded enough to actually pass out drunk at a party
This. Also, op has some shit friends.

>>57093787
And that's why I don't use that kind of security. They will have to beat me with a $5 wrench for quite a while to get my password. Holding someone down and pressing their finger against a sensor isn't hard.

How is fingerprint supposed to be anywhere near secure on a device with a touchscreen? The screen is full of the fingerprints used to unlock the phone.

>>57093787
>protecting a device with fingerprints that can be found all over the device

>mad at an innocent joke

come on, OP

>>57097320
>>57097366
Furthermore, when using any fingerprint scanner, wouldn't your fingerprint be able to be lifted from the scanner itself, unless you or the scanner wipes the scanning surface clean?

The Samsung Galaxy Note 4 doesn't have this problem ;^)

File: yeasure.png (142KB, 396x382px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 396x382px

>>57097472
fuck off samshill

we don't want your exploding phones

>>57097500
Well shilled rajesh!

>>57097472
>>57097500
retard wars

>>57093787
>>came out as gay on Facebook
Everybody already knew, you flamboyant faggot.

>>57097320
It's secure against common thieves. Not against law enforcement.
Sure, the thief could go through all the work of trying to re-create the fingerprint with something from smudges on the phone. Or he throws it away and steals the next phone.

Keep in mind that phone thieves are commonly not very intelligent.

>>57093787
>facebook
>being insecure enough to care about this
>having shit friends who wont see it as a joke
>drinking till you pass out in a stranger place

consider suicide