Why does Linux have more drivers than BSD? Shouldn't the

>>57084508
It's not about the license, anon. BSD has a very small userbase so companies don't boher making drivers for it.

>>57084619
Did it ever occur to these companies that if they made drivers for BSD there would subsequently be more people using thus increasing it's marketshare?

>>57084645
Yes, it's called Apple.

>>57084662
Oy vey.

>>57084508
nothing works on BSD, why would manufactures waste time doing drivers for an useless OS?

>>57084645
Probably not because no one uses OSes for their drivers but for the programs that can be installed on them.

>>57084689
>nothing works on BSD
Almost everything that runs on Linux can run or be ported to run on BSD.

Go spread your FUD elsewhere.

File: 1450813642321.png (210KB, 495x495px) Image search: [Google]

210KB, 495x495px

>>57084772
>Almost
more like almost everything is broken

>>57084645
this is literally the only reason Windows is still relevant

NetBSD-Current has nouveau

3d works too

>>57084645
No because the amount of people who use BSD is negligible.

>>57084645
Companies are not interested in helping this or that OS. This results in costs, and there is no benefit.