Monitor Finish: Which one is the best and why is it Glossy?

>two 15" applels

for what purpose

>>57065008
>missing the point
It's the screen anon, not the trash OS, we're talking about here.

>>57064995
Give me oled or give me death... also glossy is fine.

>>57064995
Which one is supposed to be better, left or right?

>>57064995
Glossy for color sensitive, matte for shit I can't avoid the light with.

If it's a low res (meaning less than 1920x1200 these days) low quality LCD then it might as well be matte finish because it already sucks and matte is a bit more versatile.

But if I am buying a high quality screen for good color and black levels, gotta be glossy. I'll control the lighting to avoid glare it's no big deal

I have 1080p ips on my laptop, matte. Glossy ips option simply wasnt available

>>57064995
Glossy has poor viewing angles and reflects light more.

I have some Dell monitor at work with a matte finish that I vastly prefer over our old imacs.

>>57065011
Wasn't Apple one (or THE) last company to actually ship laptops with Matte screens? I mean why do you autists sperg over Apple even though it was the last one to care enough and cater to you.

>>57065308
Huh, never knew that this very matte looking screen on my new XPS 13 was actually glossy.

>>57064995
Matte for touchscreen laptops, glossy for normal screens

>>57065308
Apple is shit and no, they aren't the only ones with matte screens. They aren't the only ones in anything positive. Use that as a rule of thumb.

>>57066509
>They aren't the only ones in anything positive.
Are 16:10 laptops even a thing outside of Apple anymore?

>>57065231
You know that matte displays aren't actually better in bright light right? The brightness is the same and all it does is distort fine detail.