>Google Chrome 55 May Use Less Memory http://v8project.b

>>57011130
lol

File: slow_snail.jpg (225KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 600x450px

Yeah because firecocks is so much better right?

These tests were done on a Skylake Xeon, 16GB of RAM and a PCI-Express SSD. e10s enabled and dom.ipc.processCount set to 50. Now tell me Firefox isn't slow:

>FF vs Chrome - 30 Random sites
https://webmshare.com/play/KBm8v
>FF vs Chrome - 11 News sites
https://webmshare.com/play/Meo8O
>FF vs Chrome - 40+ Instagram profiles on Windows
https://webmshare.com/play/Wn1GD
>FF vs Chrome - 40+ Instagram profiles on Arch Linux
https://webmshare.com/play/6wK0n
>FF vs Chrome on bad machine (2core/2thread - 2GB RAM)
https://webmshare.com/play/gBdJb
>FF vs Chrome with uBlock
https://webmshare.com/play/RAE86

>Vivaldi vs Opera vs Chrome
https://webmshare.com/play/LX38L

>>57011130

Great! Now it'll use only 8 GB of memory instead of 16.

>>57011130
Hnggg I want him to fuck me senseless

>>57011314
>Yeah because firecocks is so much better right?

Anyone still committed to Mozilla tends to use FF forks, or SeaMonkey. I've been using Pale Moon for years. Indeed, the memory usage is drastically lower. My PM installation pushes 200 MB at most.

>>57011130

Who is this spunk monk?

>>57011314
so Vivaldi is not a meme?

File: Screenshot_2016-10-10-11-14-15(1).jpg (96KB, 720x1062px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 720x1062px

ITT: ultra poorfags

>>57011379
>it's not the software's fault, you know, it's yours - for using outdated hardware!

>>57011314
>Chrome doesn't have noscript or vertical/tree tabs
Doesn't even matter how fast it is if it's as unusable as IE.

>>57011379

It's more of an environmental thing. No point in increasing your PC's voltage demands just so you can use bloated software. There are more optimized software choices out there that aren't going to soak up so much power.

>>57011400
uMatrix is available for Chrome. It's much better. It can block other resources as well but if you only want to use it as a script blocker that works too.

File: 1466980174073.jpg (100KB, 864x778px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 864x778px

>>57011395
In this case it actually is. Chrome is such a fast browser specifically because it loads entire websites into RAM and in their own sandbox. This means having to load 50-100MB of javascript your shitty website has plus all the fucking ads as well.

All this stuff requires RAM and RAM isn't expensive anymore. You have to be african-tier poor to not be able to afford an 8GB stick of RAM

>>57011400
LOL

>>57011409
kek

File: figure4.png (249KB, 1122x694px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 1122x694px

These are some pretty impressive figures m8's.

>>57011458
what's up with the bears, son?

>>57011455
>uMatrix is better
Stopped reading here.
>>57011456
>LOL
Not an argument.

>>57011485
>Stopped reading here.
Not an argument.

>>57011456
>LOL
>kek
>anime reaction image

ebin tier reply

>>57011456
bakari

>>57011332
>Anyone still committed to Mozilla tends to use FF forks, or SeaMonkey.
>unironically believing this

>>57011362
The UI is laggy on my computer. His computer must be very fast.

>>57011631
>unironically believing this

>unironically believing this isn't true

>>57011749
>implying the majority of firefox users aren't normies

>>57011802
Yeah because all normies didn't download Chrome when they saw "download a faster browser" on Google's homepage.