I had used most linux distributions for long time, Now i bought

>using linux on a laptop with dedicated graphics
Optimus is shit in linux, I don't know what you expected. Pretty much everyone recommends going Intel CPU + graphics for the smoothest experience with linux on laptop. Not sure why you would decide otherwise when you clearly have no idea what you're doing.

>>56960786
Can concur
Linux in my desktop was hell
Linux in my Intel driven laptop just werks

It makes me sad

>>56960786
I thought radeon was the one that was shit on linux laptops

>>56960818
It's not the GPU itself that is the problem but the ways of dealing with optimus for the dual graphics devices, none of which are ideal.

>>56960786
i have an nvidia gpu on my thinkpad and its always been damn smooth. cant remember the model, NVS-something

>>56960818
Optimus is more or less a hardware switch between the IGPU and the discrete mobile GPU. NVIDIA drivers are plenty for Linux but don't officially support Optimus. For that you need bumblebee which is a pile of shit.

Ahhh, just to make it clear, my laptop has an Intel GPU and an nvidia 960m, But the nvida GPU is not functional, So i cant play 4k videos or any high graphics thigns in linux.
I don't want to switch to windows, But i guss i have to

>>56960786
Intel GPU's aren't so powerful

I will try Ubuntu and see if there is any success there...

Has anyone gotten Bumblebee to work?

I've got a $1200 ASUS with a 965m and it works just fine with Nvidia proprietary drivers.

OpenSUSE though, Fedora gave me trouble.

File: Screenshot from 2016-10-07 04-40-07.png (392KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

392KB, 1920x1080px

I installed Ubuntu and I guess there problem was fedora, works perfectly in Ubuntu. sweet!!!

>>56963739
>Nvidia binary drivers (open source)
>(open source)

Lolwhat?