Even Futaba channel now has webms with sound enabled on all channels.

>video files with sound on an imageboard
For what fucking purpose?

/g/ should have that too

lol didn't you know? 4chan's shutting down...

>>56948089
>images on a text board
For what fucking purpose?

>>56947897
The weebjew is exaggerating a financial problem on BBC news to make people buy passes. I highly doubt you're going to see changes besides /wsg/ and /gif/ being removed

>>56948179
If it were to happen then /mu/ /tv/ and /asp/ would more likely get it first

>>56948235

>Text in a field of light

FOR WHAT PURPOSE

File: laughing army man.webm (293KB, 200x150px) Image search: [Google]

293KB, 200x150px

>>56947897

File: Notch.jpg (66KB, 658x370px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 658x370px

>>56948229
Not if he can do anything about it.

>>56948235
There were no images on the 4chan dis boards, newfag.

>>56947897

Waiting for IOS / OSX integration.

>>56947897
Fuck off kid. We all know you just want to post screamers.

File: pants-v8.webm (824KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

824KB, 640x640px

>>56947897
I thought the reason was so we can sliently post softcore porn without worrying about sound.

audio webms, exclusively for pass users

>>56947897
Not only that; they have VP9 webms as well. People here mock the japanese for using outdated tech but they're actually ahead of us in terms of webms.

Popular arguments against sound webms have been proven wrong. The big actual issue is that sound enabled webms would step up traffic as people will use them more in place of youtube/liveleak links.

>>56953234
4chan devs are stupid and lazy. There's no indication they have a head of their own to implement important stuff.

File: 404 girl in 3D!!!.webm (2MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1280x720px

People would abuse the sound webm feature with ear rape shit.

>>56953520
Literally all other image boards support webms with sound and none of them have this problem. Heck, even we have two boards with sounds enabled and they don't have any problems.

>>56953606
Because they are slow boards.

>>56953624
And you are basing this on?

>implying 500 posts per hour is a slow board

>>56953792
His ass, obviously

>>56948235
>not images on an imageboard

>>56954396
Alright then
>text on an imageboard
?