>be me >want to upload 20.2 MB image to 4chin >4mb image

File: Screenshot_2.png (3MB, 1439x777px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1439x777px

as I said, no quality loss
Left pic is compressed, right pic is uncompressed

>>56940278
but to have uploaded this image it would need to be compressed. (You) fucked your argument over right there.

Incoming webp post, everyone hide

>>56940241
because i hate mobile posters.

>>56941626
but when compressing you save 4chan
4chan is running out of space you know

>>56941155
No, he cropped the image. Cropping != compression.

>>56940241

That looks compressed. You are only fooling yourself.

>>56940241
Upload the original somewhere and link it

>>56940241
>take a photo with hardware that outputs to jpg
>losslessly convert all the noise and artifacts in it to png without realizing
>wow why is this so big
>"compress" it by converting back to jpg

>>56942006
I didn't crop it, i compressed it.
The original res was 6563x8325.
The exact of the original pic.

Where is the WebP guy?

>>56941981
no 4chan means no more mobilefags and newfags. i win either way.

>>56942112
Here you go.
https://my.mixtape.moe/sfwjdh.jpg

>>56942446
What would you do if there was no 4chan?
nothing right?

>>56942504
>[email protected]

>>56943173
what?

>>56940241
I just convert my /bst/ shit to jpg. I dont care enough otherwise

>>56940278

It's not even the same image you stupid weasel.

>>56943491
it is you autist

>>56943463
It's in the exif data.

>>56942549
sleep and die. i win.

>>56944038
lelelelel
>>56940241
>uses gimp
>doesn't know about exif

File: webp_vs_jpg_comparison_50p.png (2MB, 1011x3032px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1011x3032px

You can save even more space with Webp.

>>56944272
>implying its my email
>implying im using gimp
fuck off

>>56942381
fucking kek sure it is bud

>>56944327
try it out yourself. download the original image (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Truncated_lancet_windows,_Rock_of_Cashel.jpg#/media/File:Truncated_lancet_windows,_Rock_of_Cashel.jpg) and compress it with http://compressjpeg.com/
thats what i did

>>56942381
I think you misread that. I was talking about the comparison image you posted. I was correcting him because he said that both were compressed in the comparison.

>>56940278
not even same pic though