What's good software to make charts/data visualizations

>>56816241
Y-you again.

>>56816241
How does this even work. I wish I knew more about computers and data

>>56816507
It's basically running an image through ffmpeg, making a 2 second video that displays 1 frame each second.

Here are the scripts I use to convert images to static webms if you're interested:

JPG

for %%f IN (*.jpg) do (
ffmpeg -loop 1 -i "%%~nf.jpg" -an -c:v libvpx -qmin 16 -qmax 16 -crf 16 -quality best -threads 4 -t 2 -r 1  "%%~nf.webm"
)

PNG

for %%f IN (*.png) do (
ffmpeg -loop 1 -i "%%~nf.png" -an -c:v libvpx -qmin 16 -qmax 16 -crf 16 -quality best -threads 4 -t 2 -r 1  "%%~nf.webm"
)

Just copy one of the scripts, save it as script.bat in notepad, put it in a directory of images you want to convert, double click on it, and watch the magic happen. All you need ffmpeg to be installed.

File: CAPTAIN AUTISMO.jpg (8KB, 504x332px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 504x332px

>>56816241
>>56816531

>>56816507
what is it doing?

>>56816542
I love you too :^).

>>56816548
see >>56816531

>>56816548
>what is it doing?
Lossy compression

>>56816241
Looks worse.

>>56816564
But what the point?
What is this illustrating?
Why do they keep being posted?
I see a tiny change between the two frames, what am I missing?

>>56816583
Somewhat but the file size reduction is fucking massive. OP should be hung for wasting so much fucking bandwidth.

>>56816596
Naw hes right you lose tons of detail, just use jpeg to compress it further.

>>56816590

See >>56816542

Save and post whenever autismo posts a webm.

>>56816590
It's 11KB compared to the 132KBs of the OP image
The point is to illustrate the superiority of vp8 as an image compression mechanism

>>56816590
Mainly file size reduction and to somewhat simulate what it would be like if 4chan allowed us to upload webp images.

See https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery1

Currently Webp can compress an image for half the file size of JPG and the same visual qualtiy.

>>56816613
doesn't work that well, there are artifacts everywhere

>>56816619

non standard image format. never happening in the near future

>>56816552
I'VE TOLD YOU ALREADY, STOP POSTING YOUR SHITTY WEBMS YOU GOD DAMN KIKE.

>>56816619
webp, while based on vp8, isn't the same, your webm vp8 snips of video aren't as good as jpeg.

File: screen_shot.png (10KB, 574x84px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 574x84px

>>56816586
Why does this JPG turn to 14KB when you download it? Are you a hacker? Also it clearly looks twice as bad as the webm.

>>56816668
It clearly looks better than the webm as the webm is blurred and detail is lost.

>>56816621
True but JPG does a hell of a lot worse. Hell our tripfag had to fake his JPG file size to pretend that JPG is not dogshit.

See >>56816668

>>56816542
lol

So can someone help me find chartmaking software or what

>>56816734
Oh, sorry.
Microsoft Visio.

>>56816747
Thanks

>>56816678
Are you brain damaged?

>>56816763
just use excel, that shits installed by OEM nowdays.

>>56816763
He's just trolling m8, use inkscape instead. Once you get the hang of it you can make some pretty 1337 stuff and you will never have to worry about image resolution.

>>56816785
You are.
Look anywhere on it and the right side is blurred and doesn't look right. Especially the face, you can't see the eye, there is a weird white dot on the tongue.

>>56816821
Really, both are shit, however JPG introduces massive color loss and heavy blocking artifacts, coupled with color banding. Yes some parts of the still webm look blurry (more like smoothed out) but it retains more detail in general.

>>56816638
???

http://caniuse.com/#feat=webp

Beside SJW using the SJW browser, everyone can see webp on their browser.

Plotly desu senpai

File: 1475034281151.webm (45KB, 1000x555px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 1000x555px

>>56816785

>>56816665
>webp, while based on vp8, isn't the same, your webm vp8 snips of video aren't as good as jpeg.
see >>56816785

Also you're forgetting that Webp does a hell of a better job compressing images than a still webm does.

File: .gif (30B, 10000x10000px) Image search: [Google]

30B, 10000x10000px

>>56816241
get at me

>>56816886
kek

>>56816873
>Beside SJW using the SJW browser, everyone can see webp on their browser.

and which cameras save to webp format? thought so, fuck off autist.

>>56816908

BTFO

>>56816984

HAHAH his fagbook probably crashed

>>56816935
>and which cameras save to webp format? thought so, fuck off autist.
What does that have to do with an image format meant to be used to share images on the web? Though I can see webp support for cameras coming soon especially since webp has lossless encoding.

>>56817058
>What does that have to do with an image format meant to be used to share images on the web?

well dullard, it means it isn't a standard format. you really don't expect everyone to take the extra step of converting their entire library of jpegs to webp do you? normies ecen knowing what a wepb is? lmao

jpegs are ubiquitous because every capable device can save to and read jpegs.

grow a brain, autist

>>56817117
Not him but if what you say is true then why are websites like ebay already using webp?

>>56817137
one site having support does not change the fact cameras do not save to webp thus webp is not a standard.

>>56817182
That's not the only website using Webp and you still haven't answered my question. You're saying webp is not a standard format but a ton of things and websites are now literally using it. That sounds like a standard format to me.

>>56817272
You're talking to a retard who has decided to arbitrarily define the word "standard" as "any format cameras save to" and insist that this definition he pulled out of his ass is absolute truth

Just ignore him

>>56817272

You clearly don't understand what makes a standard, do you moron? If no capture device saves to your fantastic, special snowflake format, how do you expect people to share images in that format effortlessly? One, two, perhaps even 100 sites out of the billions on the web does not make a standard unless creating and sharing the file format is as effortless and ubiquitous as jpeg.

Now fuck off and get me a burger and fries.

>>56817300

See >>56817300 you braindead autist

>>56816214
>Tableau
>Power BI
>Qlik View
You cant control design 100% but you van customize a lot + if you are a student you can get free licence for tableau

File: sides.jpg (13KB, 370x370px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 370x370px

>>56817272
>>56817300

>yo guys, lets make a rarely used image file type that no one can save to without converting first from jpeg and call it a standard

i remember /g/ being better than this

>>56817300

Ah k. So I take it in your position the Lightening port is standard for audio. Gotcha.

>>56817272
>a ton of things and websites are now literally using it

Can you name a few of these please? Thanks.

>>56817334
>>56817365
>>56817396
>>56817415
>>56817433
Stop posting fag

>>56817492

The sweet smell of "not an argument"

>>56817272
>a ton of things and websites are now literally using it

I am still waiting. Can you name these please. Don't let me down now.

>>56817433
>>56817580
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebP#Support

Ebay, facebook, and other websites are is using it right now as well.

>>56817300

How would you define standard? Compare that definition to jpeg.

>>56817613
wow, 2 websites, that sure is "a ton". better call it a standard eh?

>>56817658
Other websites are using it as well but I can't be arsed to research them. Also these websites get a fuckload of traffic m8.

>>56817671
>Also these websites get a fuckload of traffic m8.

Traffic is irrelevant. What you mean is the site SUPPORTS the format. It means diddly squat if next to no-one is uploading webp images to it. You would have a point if greater than 50% of visitors to the site were uploading their images in webp format but we know that ain't the case because .................. it ain't a standard image format :^)

>>56817300

Still waiting >>56817618

Ah well. I guess you never understood what made something standard to begin with.

File: challenging problem.gif (88KB, 10000x10000px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 10000x10000px

>>56817001
>>56816984

>>56816665
>FFmpeg linked with the VP8/VP9 reference codec library libvpx can extract VP8 key frames from WebM media and a script can then add the WebP RIFF header and the NUL pad byte for odd frame lengths.
i. e. you can rip out frames out of a VP8 stream, slap a webp header in front and you have a webp. so webms are roughly as big as webp. i. e. smaller than jpg

>>56816542

>Uses SJWFox
>Whines that his clunky, slow as fuck browser is also centuries behind in features as well

Woah no way, man.

>>56816214
smem, matplotlib