>he still using firefox and not using this masterpiece I

>no vimperator
in to the trash it goes

>>56728539
I'm not using Firefox but I'm not using that pile of trash either.

>not using IceCat
Enjoy your no freedoms

File: 1458594768347.jpg (26KB, 498x412px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 498x412px

>he
>assuming my gender
Please use "they" in the future.

I use firefox instead. It's more extendable.

>>56728669
Are you using a bigger pile of garbage called opera?

>>56728700
I'm using the best browser ever and yes it's called Opera.

>>56728708
Another baited.

>>56728714
Bait has nothing to do with this.

I'm using opera, faggot.

Is there an add on for Chrome that makes it possible to open links in new private tab (not window)?

>hes using that outdated masterpiece which has been overtaken by brave

>>56728539
>he
>>56728539
>Chrom
kys yourself

>>56728916
You know girls are not allowed on 4chan, right?

File: Screenshot_20160922_090606.png (205KB, 401x600px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 401x600px

>>56728698
He's talking about one person though, not multiple.

>>56729024
Then "they" would be even more appropriate.

>>56729042
No. We're talking about a singular noun, "they" is never appropriate.

>>56728539
brave is better and is driving the world mad
https://blog.brave.com/braves-response-to-the-naa-a-better-deal-for-publishers/

I use both Firefox and Chromium. I keep using Firefox because it supposedly protects privacy and with Classic Theme Restorer it's the same browser it has been forever.

Chromium is nice and now that Netflix works on it there aren't many reasons not to use it as my main browser, save for the nebulous claims of botnet on /g/.

I tried Iridium but the development cycle is too slow. No updates since July.

>>56729042
>I speak English, honestly

>>56728539
>2015
>not using epiphany with wayland

>>56728539
I hope you're talking about the ungooglified version...
just use iridium. It's chromium without google shit.
Yes even in chromium, google is spying on you, you have to remove it yourself beforehand.

>>56728632
There's no version for it? What about pentadactyl?

>>56728539
Chrome is crap and satanistic

>>56729123
>>56729050

>what is a singular they????
Just google it

>>56729355
They is a grammatical oddball and grey area.
Is is used in place of the singular but it is not singular.

>>56729024
I agree, use "ze" when talking in singular form

>>56729355
>Somebody left their umbrella in the office. Would they please collect it?
Somebody left his or her umbrella in the office. Would he or she please collect it.
>The patient should be told at the outset how much they will be required to pay.
The patient should be told at the outset how much he or she will be required to pay.
>But a journalist should not be forced to reveal their sources.
But a journalist should not be forced to reveal his or her sources.

>>56729405
He is fine.

>>56729468
They is more than fine.

>>56729565
Or you could be grammatically correct and use he or she.

>>56729578
i like how you're trying to coach someone on how to speak english when you can't even grasp the concept of gender neutral phrasing.

>inb4 muh sjw memes

it's actually a linguistic thing.

>>56729654
Eat a dick, tranny.

>>56729668
>this mad he got called out for being wrong

i use the tor browser for everything. i DD tailsOS

>>56729684
>implying I was wrong
I'm not even mad, just annoyed about you trannies whining for special treatment. We get it, you either chopped your dick off or intend to. Nobody gives a shit, move on with your odd and pathetic life.

File: adndpronouns.png (36KB, 739x195px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 739x195px

/thread

>>56729413
thanks, this takes me back to hs

>>56728675
GNU is cuckware

>>56728708
No you are still using chromuim maybe you're just not aware of it, but enjoy your eyestrain from dirctwrite

>>56729565
This. Fucking illiterate retards. "they" has been a thing and still is. Especially in formal talk and writing.

BOTNET
O
T
N
E
T

>>56729836
I'm neither using Chromium nor DirectWrite.

File: googledrive.jpg (155KB, 630x447px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 630x447px

>>56729860

>>56729855
But opera uses the chromium engine and direct write is locked in the new versions, explain yourself please?

I used Chromium for a while but then it started lagging more and more so I switched to Opera. I like the built in VPN and adblocker.

>>56729919
You're thinking of Chropera. I'm using Opera, which uses Presto. And DirectWrite is a Windows thing, even if I was using Chrom* or Chropera I still wouldn't be using DirectWrite.

File: googlehangouts.jpg (50KB, 543x392px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 543x392px

>>56729901

>>56729945
Isn't that terribly outdated? I tried using it a few weeks back and it was slow as hell compared to Firefox.

>>56730071
Sadly, yes. The last update was a little over three years ago. Still the best browser bar none. I'll probably be using it till it no longer works with the modern web.

>>56730094
>3 year old browser
Enjoy your exploits

>>56730107
>a three year old web browser is insecure
No shit, sherlock.

>>56730113
Its obvious yes so why use it still?
At least try and take security seriously even though its most likely futile.

>>56730094
It was my favourite browser back in the day desu. I'd still use it (chropera) if I had windows since Firefox is slow on it and chropera is basically chrome without Google shit and a builtin adblock so it runs pretty fast.

Any hope of Mozilla fixing Firefox next update or a patch?

>>56728539
>using botnet the resource hog instead of glorious safari
>current year

>>56730146
Because whenever I do something where security would be an issue I'm more than capable of firing up SeaMonkey. I don't need muh über safer sooper updated security for general web browsing though.

>>56729814
Pretty much this. Do whatever you want with your body, just don't bother me with the details. Everyone is so hung up about sexualilty, it's really boring to me. I won't bother you till you start cramming your personal details in my face, or force me to change my behavior. Fascists.

is chromium able to use addons could anyone tell me?

>>56729050
Actually, liberals changed they so that it refers to a singular person.

>>56730361
Bastardizations of the language don't count.

>>56729050
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singular_they

read up, gov

>>56730392
See >>56729413 and >>56730373

>>56729413
>one word versus three

you must not be one for parsimony

>>56730373
languages are bound to change over time, if they didn't we'd still be grunting and gesturing

>>56730459
>muh shortness
y dont u tlk lyk dis? Itz shortr

>>56730481
because efficiency is not just determined by length but also common understanding. nobody else spells like that so i would just be defeating the purpose of being succinct

>>56730510
Regardless that painfully wrong way (holy shit, two extra words and all of them are 3 letters or less! How ever will you live!?) is the proper way.

>>56729814
you're projecting hard. this was about language not trannies. are you hiding some sort of insecurity? lmao.

>>56730568
Because it's a tranny that's doing the whining.

>>56730432
Are you underage? People said "they" for a single person for ages.

>>56730704
No

>>56728675
Enjoy your oudated Firefox

>>56730715
Yes

>>56728632
Why not qutebrowser?

I'm not using a browser looking like shit with no ability to customize the appearance.

>>56730732
Nope

>>56730477
True but there is a difference between a language evolving naturally and libcucks trying to redefine words because their world view isn't supported by facts

>>56730745
Because that's a completely different browser and not the question that was asked.

File: Opera-Browser-Logo.png (50KB, 1866x1050px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 1866x1050px

>>56728539
>he's still using any version of Chrome and not superior Opera

I hope you're not doing this, anon.

>>56730749
>he chooses aesthetics over performance

you need to be 18+ to use this site, lad.

>>56729654
>tumblr genders

Takes about a zillion years to compile..fuck it

>>56731120
>he thinks performance matters in a fucking browser
Having a browser that's not vomit-inducing is definitely worth taking mere milliseconds longer to load a web page

>>56731155
>mere milliseconds

It's a very noticeable improvement. You'd notice straight away if you had actually used it in within the past year.

>>56731182
Last time I used Chrom* was 2008 and it's going to stay that way.

>>56731205
>Last time I used Chrom* was 2008

I figured as much, which is why your argument is now utterly pointless.

Is anyone else sick to fucking death of these Google shills?

File: 2016-09-22_20-08-20.png (723KB, 1173x839px) Image search: [Google]

723KB, 1173x839px

>>56731120
What performance?
I choose usability. My browser theme uses minimal space while being useful, giving more space for the actual page.

>>56730536
there is no "proper" way though, if people use it and others understand it then it is a perfectly valid use of language

>>56731511
I'm more sick of firecucks.

>>56730568
Says the one weeping about pronouns

> Toppest of keks

>>56730992
Pretty sure that isnt the reason you dont use qutebrowser tho anon

>>56729978
>oversized shirts
there's enough to dress half the poor kids in Niggropia

>>56731702
No, I don't use it because firefox and vimperator is better and after spending years using dwb I prefer something more stable. This thread is about chromium though so it's irrelevant to the discussion.

>>56731612
>>56731511
lets all come together and drop both and move to brave which is specifically designed to damage kike web advertisers and to spite furryfox company

>>56731248
It's still a perfectly valid argument. I couldn't give less of a shit if it can render web pages faster, I don't fucking care if it's instantaneous, it's still not worth it.

>>56728632
Try cVim. Plebs will tell you Vimium is an alternative, but it's not. cVim more closely reflects the features we have in Vimperator.

>>56729289
Pentadactyl is for Firefox, and it is broken beyond belief due to the developers giving up.

>>56730745
Yes. Give up all your other addons in order to have Vimesqe keybindings. Sounds like a good plan. Maybe when qutebrowser has add-on support.

>>56730799
a convention is not a scientific fact ya dummy.

>>56728539
>he's still using web browsers
>he hasn't ascended into the internet itself
i'm so sorry, anon

>>56731248
I'm not the guy you're replying to, but the last time I used Chromium was today, and it is still shit. Still can't hide the useless bars at the top. Still has no ability to clear data until you restart it. What fucking kind of piece of shit browser can't clear data until you restart it?

>>56730202
>where security would be an issue
Like viewing a PNG image on an imageboard?
Step up, senpai

>>56730727
fuck did they still not update from the last ESR branch?

>>56732267
What?

>>56728539
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6QdSLeQ0494

>>56732287
It's in beta, gotta be stable.

>>56728898
It doesn't have plugin support yet, does it?

>>56728698
OP should of said (You) or あなた instead

>>56728898
>Brave

Yeah, I sure love it when a browser that tries selling me on its adblocking capabilities fails to block ads on Youtube.

>>56728539
>no vim
>no treestyletabs
>no customizable UI
>no customizable anything

inb4 muh addons

>>56729727
can't post from tor senpai

>>56728539
>still using botnet and not browsing the web via wget

>>56732190
No, but a conscious effort to change certain words in order to force them to fit their delusional world view is not how language evolves

Gender is a perfect example of this

No matter how many times irrelevant tumblrites and gender studies fucktards state that it's a social construct, science says it's not

>>56732566
yes but just no browser/store for it yet

>>56729654
"It" is gender neutral. What's wrong with it?

firefox isn't that bad assholes

>>56732980
it's not that good either, asshole.

>>56733050
chrome is shit too, and firefox is really improving performance since v48

>>56732980
It's fine! People will hate whatever is popular

I am a newfag who downloaded linux today, chrome be a botnet is a meme or was comproved?

>>56732356
https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-7294/Libpng.html

>>56734641
>fucking google
>have a botnet
What do you think?

>>56734724
neat, sticking with Opera

>>56728698

How dare you assume my gender you cis white male scum