Daily i7 thread, no amdpoor or shitty i5/3's Xeon

>>56701618
aren't i5 just as good as i7's in most cases?

File: 2016-06-27 06_43_29-CPU-Z.png (24KB, 400x397px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 400x397px

sup

>>56701652
excellent choice my friend

>>56701651
If your "most cases" is browsing facebook, then even i3 is just as good.

>>56701651
This is what the poorfags want you to belive to justify themself that an i5 is good.

>>56701618
Do ultralow voltage i7s count?

File: image.png (165KB, 777x656px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 777x656px

>i7 on my machine
>dual core
>hyperthreading
>2.4Ghz (when turbo'ed)
Yeah, fucking i5 cucks get a reel CPU

>>56701690
It's an i7.

File: 1452183561304.jpg (10KB, 193x181px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 193x181px

>>56701691
>mobile i7

who gives a fuck? It's a laptop CPU.

File: image.png (156KB, 362x259px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 362x259px

>>56701722
It's an i7 so this is my thread
i5's need not apply

>>56701751
>i5's need not apply
don't worry, i've got that 6 core 5820k.

a dual core i7 is like a midget tranny. Isn't one fetish enough?

>>56701618

i3 gatecrashing and there's nothing you can do about it

amdcuck here i hate my life

>>56701807
ofc, you have ampoo

I7 is a meme

File: hi.png (156KB, 609x598px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 609x598px

>>56701618

AMD esta acabado y en bancarrota!!!

>>56701651
The difference is hyber-threading. i5's are 4C no HT, i7's are 4C + HT.

File: 2016-09-20 14_41_16-CPU-Z.png (29KB, 403x402px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 403x402px

>tfw had an i3 2100 for 5 years
Feels so good not being bottlenecked anymore

5930k master race here.
It might be the last CPU I ever need to buy at this rate of progress

File: 2016-09-20-164249_1254x726_scrot.png (296KB, 1254x726px) Image search: [Google]

296KB, 1254x726px

Am welcome: y/n?

>>56701865
>i7's are 4C + HT.
i'd like to have a word with you
>>56701652

>>56701865
i7s don't always have 4 cores, but they always are better than what the other guy has

File: Speccy64_2016-08-28_16-42-11.png (61KB, 892x565px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 892x565px

my league of lego gaymen machin

>>56701678

The fuck are you on about? Even Atoms can browse Fagbook just fine, doesn't take anything special to look at Normiebook

>>56701865
>i7's are 4C + HT
I'd like to have a word with you
>>56701848

>>56701902
>>56701908
Yeah, the LGA 1366 / 2011 stuff is 4+ core, but my point is i5 = no HT. i7 = HT.

Also, only 6 cores? How cute...

ITT: plebs that watched Linus Shill Tip videos and think they know anything

File: 1446753857515.png (166KB, 1000x924px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 1000x924px

>>56701939
>Also, only 6 cores? How cute...

how many do you have

>>56701939
Yeah but the LGA 1366/2011 stuff isn't all i7's so it's obviously crap

File: image.png (97KB, 201x201px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 201x201px

>>56701960
>he has amd

>>56701974

kek

File: IMG_20160727_170409.jpg (2MB, 3024x4032px)

2MB, 3024x4032px

Is-s my i7 welcome here?

File: 1454259991251.gif (2MB, 588x470px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 588x470px

>>56701974
are you retarded?
>>56701652

When he said
>Also, only 6 cores? How cute...
He was talking about my 5820k. Which is 6 haswell-e cores with hyper threading, and clocked at 4.4GHz daily.

File: Capture.png (13KB, 419x475px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 419x475px

>>56701960
Enough.

>>56701962
Xeon > i7

>>56701974
My APU1D4 is a T-40, yes, but see pic related.

>>56702019
Lol that garbage single core performance though.

If I needed more cores i'd have gone for a Xeon ES myself.

>>56702019
>2.2ghz
>0% utilisation
Living the dream

>>56702019
>Xeon > i7
except when it comes to performance, lol

>>56702019
>not an i7
AHAHAHAHAHAHAH get out

>>56702087
>AHAHAHAHAHAHAH get out

Op post says
>Xeon is welcome too.

File: yo.jpg (121KB, 1197x777px)

121KB, 1197x777px

What's this thread about anyways?

>>56702043
>garbage single core performance
Guess it's a good thing that most of what I do is multi-threaded then.

>>56702073
u wot m8?

i7's are re-binned Xeons, so there's that...

>>56702087
Why, you can't handle multiple sockets?

File: yo2.jpg (152KB, 1198x774px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 1198x774px

>>56702103
Here's another one

>>56702119
I thought xeons were rebinned i7s? Because they won the lottery and are super reliable or something?

>>56702174
>I thought xeons were rebinned i7s? Because they won the lottery and are super reliable or something?
From what I recall, i7's start off as Xeon E3's / E5's, and are re-binned to either backfill orders, or for whatever other reason Intel can think of.

It's easier to cut out something on a CPU then it is to make a 2nd run without the item.

>>56702215
yeah they just disable features for the i7s.


There is zero point creating two different designs if you can just create one product line and disable features for the non-server SKUs.

>>56701898
Well aren't you just a piece of shit

>>56701618
>daily good goy thread

>>56701807
My desktop has a FX-9590 in it. I'm pretty sure I hate my life more.
>tfw my $1300 space heater never gets used because the X220 is too comfy

File: 2016-09-20-171509_1959x1178_scrot.png (195KB, 1959x1178px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 1959x1178px

>>56702320
So mobile i7 not allowed
Instead I will post my old desktop with i7

>>56702320
he really is, jordan is such an edgelord cunt.

If I were in a room with a gun and 2 bullets with Jordan, Hitler, and robo-Hitler, Jordan is getting shot twice and i'm just going to have to apologize to the jews.

>>56702360
>xeons come with a "validate" button
>Intel knows what xeon buyers actually want

>>56702365
Looks like someone's desktop got insulted, lol

>>56701618
Posting from my single core celeron

>>56702420
I don't get it

Bought a laptop today
Was happy its a good new i5
See this thread just after starting that laptop and going to /g/

File: Hy4AKqK.png (45KB, 725x593px)

45KB, 725x593px

Rate my build : - )

>>56701974
>what is Xeon

>>56702103
>>56702148
>laptop """"""""""""""""""""i7s"""""""""""""""""""

>>56702507
>666mHz
wew

>>56701690
>>56701709
Less powerful than some high-end i5, checkmate fucking illiterate faggot.

>>56702662
It's not our fault Intel uses jewish tricks

File: 1465162872168.gif (180KB, 300x291px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 300x291px

FX 8320 in one rig, i5 4430 in a dif machine. Come at me.

i7 6600U whatever that is

>>56702662
It's a beast of a cpu though

File: ss+(2016-09-21+at+12.49.26).png (18KB, 521x381px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 521x381px

i will now make grown men infuriated over the parts in my comuter.

>>56702869
not really, my laptop's cpu is 37% faster and doesn't feel that beastly; feels like my 3 year old midrange desktop in terms of raw CPU power

>>56702880
>grown men
>/g/
wew lad...

>>56702901
*biologically grown men
/g/ cant be THAT attractive to children

>>56702892
The only people who think a laptop i7 is "beastly" are upgrading from core2duos or similar shit CPUs.

Or similarly old mobile CPUs which were even more shit.

When you compare shit to something modern, it's gonna feel pretty good, but a laptop i7 compared to even a desktop i5 is just a joke.

>>56702914
Some of us need to get out of the basement every now and then

>>56702909
>*biologically grown men
Fair enough.

>/g/ cant be THAT attractive to children
Have you seen the quality of threads over the years?

>>56702892
>>56702914
I wasn't bragging or anything, it really is a powerful laptop cpu but nothing special

>>56702959
It's dual core, truly not a powerful thing

File: 1462408473148.png (191KB, 419x398px)

191KB, 419x398px

>>56702952
>haivng a use for a powerful CPU means I dont leave the basement.


uhh okay?

>>56702979
Get off your horses you dick

>>56702992
I'm in my comfy bed on my laptop w/i7 and not on a horse.

>>56702952
>not working at home
>not having a 10k/month or more job
i feel sorry for you desu

>>56701879
I have the same CPU.

I found out it actually has an unlocked multiplier recently. Feels good.

>>56701994
Owner of a Vintage Core i7 920, reporting in! Welcome to the club, anon! :)

What programs make use of HT?

>>56703103
Ableton does but it doesn't need to because it's just fucking audio encoding

The feeling when I have a 12 "core" apu...

Get out fagot
>>>/v/

File: 20150416_214220.jpg (2MB, 2988x5312px)

2MB, 2988x5312px

>>56701618
2600K 4.7ghz master race reporting

File: explorer_2016-09-20_20-23-46.png (30KB, 566x546px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 566x546px

>>56701618

Sup

File: 32π.jpg (73KB, 800x250px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 800x250px

>>56701618
sup guise?

File: dt.jpg (379KB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

379KB, 3840x2160px

can i stay

>>56703345
chcukled @hostname
u can stay

File: 1395205648490.jpg (108KB, 1097x823px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 1097x823px

>>56703287

2500K 4.5ghz master race here

>>56703368
>>56703287
post 2700k at 4.9 GHz next pls

>>56703368
>I5 need not apply

>>56703389
I used to be stable at 5.2ghz 1.51V but not anymore.
I wonder why that is

>>56703368
What the fuck is up with that water cooling loop?

File: 1395205712036.jpg (107KB, 1099x824px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 1099x824px

>>56703454

Absolutely nothing.

AMD E1 mobile chips are better then 2nd generation i7

>>56703520
Not even in the wildest AMD fanboys' dream's is this true.

>>56701618
Upgraded from an FX-8320 to 6700k.
Also went from 1600 DDR3 to 3200 DDR4.

Shit just happens, I didn't know you could open browsers or text documents faster but you can.

>>56701865
>>56701651
Not just HT, an i7 will typically have more cache

the difference HT makes on a i7 is like having an extra core

you can turn HT off and get better clocks but not worth it

File: Capture.png (203KB, 527x505px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 527x505px

time for an upgrade soon?

File: tfw 100 yuro cpu upgrade.png (34KB, 417x414px)

34KB, 417x414px

Who else comfy x58 Xeon here?

>>56702364
No, you bought a gaming laptop and installed linux. Windows 10 for games. If you aren't gaming why did you buy a gaming laptop

File: quadcorefags btfo.png (12KB, 328x243px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 328x243px

>>56704341
also post cinebench scores

>>56704339
unless you need more cores, no point, 6800k or 6850k would just give you a generic ~15-20% IPC improvement, but that's about it.

File: Capture.png (39KB, 311x715px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 311x715px

>>56704422
All done at a conservative 4.4ghz I could push the chip much harder but I want it to last me a few more years. There is considerable fluctuation between runs though.

File: 2016-07-17 07_34_15-Program Manager.png (34KB, 499x691px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 499x691px

>>56704341
>>56704422

I hope you dont expect that to last more than a year or two at those speeds.

>>56704339
What are these 57 multipliers and how is it possible ?

File: 20160921_015529.jpg (4MB, 5312x2988px)

4MB, 5312x2988px

>>56704341
Was comfy a while ago

>>56704461
Paid 100 bucks for this chip, I'll live if it goes up in smoke. And sub 1.35VCore is generally considered safe for X58 Xeons.
nice score tho

File: 2670.png (21KB, 407x400px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 407x400px

>>56701618
dual xeon master race reporting in

>>56704504
x58 was the shit back in the day ran my i7 930 at 4.2ghz all day every day didn't notice any degradation.

>>56704534
quad core at 4.2GHz is not a hex core at 4.5GHz, just saying.

>>56704491
>>56704534
It's been a really good purchase.
Bought this system 6 fucking years ago and it's going strong. Too bad there is no real SATA3 support and my mainboard has shitty a Realtek NIC.
It's going to be expensive to upgrade in ~1 year. No way I'm not getting at least another hex

>>56704564
I sold off most of my X58 mobos when they were selling for $200 a piece on ebay, you might be able to get a bit of money to help with the upgrade if the prices are still decent

>>56703507
That's a lot of bad going on all in one place.

>>56701618
Well, I have a shitty i7 4500U
And regret every single day of my purchase.

>small penis nerd loser's bragging thread
pathetic.
enjoy dying a lonely virgins.

>>56704349
I don't really play games, but I don't want a piece of shit non-performant machine even if it's just my bedposting machine

>>56704734
I dont get this thread, theyre more expensive and slower than the compared i5s

Xenons are even shittier unless you work for nasa. What are you people doing even ? Just buying to grow your internet dick ?

>>56704801
the name and sticker is tuff fuck off cunt

>>56704801
7 is more than 5, retard.
On what planet would and i5 beat a i7?

>>56704801
>Xenons are even shittier unless you work for nasa
What did he mean by this

>>56704801
>hating on xeons
lmao at this poorfag

>>56704801
>t. AMD poorfag

>>56704801
>xenons
so poor he doesn't even know their name

>>56704876
>so poor he doesn't even know their name
to be fair when I was 14 I didn't know they weren't called Xenons either. People must have thought I was pretty dim

File: scrot.png (85KB, 1344x726px)

85KB, 1344x726px

Laptop i7s count, right?

>>56704889
And what a 2 years it's been

>>56704801
i5's are only relevant for gaming.
If your doing any kind of CPU heavy work your gonna want an i7.
Guess you have to be a proud owner of an i7 to understand.

First benchmarks of Bristol Ridge APUs already show that they are faster than your precious i7-6700K CPUs.

http://hwbot.org/submission/3320499

File: overclock.png (229KB, 1004x740px) Image search: [Google]

229KB, 1004x740px

X5650 for $100 or wait for kaby and do a full upgrade?

i have a 6700k and I spend most my time shitposting

>tfw i5

Should I kill myself?

File: Full Speccy.png (192KB, 1347x820px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 1347x820px

How do you do, my fellow kids?

>>56705727
>AMD is completely honest with their benchmarks.
I will believe it when they launch it to consumers.

>>56704837
>>56704841
>>56704876
1-2 minutes of difference, that is the cooldown for posting rajesh. Be less obvious next time or you wont get paid

>>56705809
Na bro, i5 is fine. Not the best but perfectly fine.

File: IMG_20160921_145449.jpg (2MB, 3456x4608px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3456x4608px

I have Xeon e3 1231 v3 bclk over clock to 4.0ghz and it's fucking sick

>>56704193
this right here. most people don't even think about it, but it does help a lot.

I have a 4770HQ with the 128MB L4 cache and it blows the other haswell i7's out of the water by 5-10%!

>>56705814
2.6ghz max speed lol nice single thread performance

>>56705814
Only thing I've seen with higher scores are dual 2699v4's OC'd and some E7 xeon setups.

>>56701618
>Hai guys buyers remorese thread
That hyper threading you never needed but paid 700 bucks for treating you well anon? ;^]

>>56705892
Still better than AMD single thread performance.

File: images.jpg (11KB, 300x240px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 300x240px

i7 920 was the most influential processor who agrees

>>56705919
Hahaha got them there kek

>>56705919
tyrannosaurus rekt

>>56705907
My Xeon was cheaper than i5 in my country 330 compared to 380

File: Magnum Front.jpg (242KB, 1028x967px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 1028x967px

>>56705895
>Only thing I've seen with higher scores are dual 2699v4's OC'd and some E7 xeon setups.
This is a 2699v4 ES overclocked 3%
(lookup QHUP)

Linus did a quad E7 system and that only cinebenched a 6000. It cost $40,000. My system cost $3500ish

Here's my completed PC Part Picker
https://pcpartpicker.com/b/b8LD4D

>>56705942
>>56705951
Haha this thread is literally just a big circlejerk.

>>56705989
You gotta get off every now and then mate

File: 1473859500459s.jpg (3KB, 111x125px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 111x125px

best i5 vs best i7 = same performance in gaming.

now make me fall for the i7 and more than 4cores meme, dear core elitsts. i'm waiting

>>56702359
i have amd fx 6300 so i am more cucked than you

>>56706038
Xeon was cheaper than i5 in my country

>>56706038
you'll be able to run waifu2x 20% faster with an i7

>>56705967
world record is with 4x E7 8890v4, 96 cores, 192 threads, 2.4GHz, 8,299CB

>>56706038
Run cinebench, it is common knowledge that i5 is best value for gaming.
Productivity wise i7 is better.
$200 doesn't usually matter to professionals.

>>56705967
>It cost $40,000
then he overspent.

E7-8890v4 cost ~$7k for retail CPUs, four of them is ~$28k.
Unless he just overspent like crazy on a huge SSD array or something, there is no reason to spend over ~$35k including rack, chassis, etc.

And as we know, you can generally find ES's if you look hard enough. The 8890v4 ES's go for a few thousand a pop, but still generally half off the retail cost.

File: Magnum Build 06.jpg (104KB, 967x563px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 967x563px

>>56706061
Wow only 64% faster than me

>>56706141
>He overspent
Yeah I'm sure he paid for all of that.

He doesn't even know what he's doing half the time, he just reads the marketing blurb and skims how things function.

Also, he's a faggot.

>>56705922

Disagree.
There have been a very many processors that caught savvy consumers attention.

>>56706159
I imagine it has to do with the increased overhead from the complexity of quad socket CPU with 4-way quad channel memory.

Just how dual 2699v4 wont be double a single 2699v4. Except it gets even worse with a 4 socket system.

File: snapshot_09.43_[2016.07.28_08.09.01].png (4MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1920x1080px

>>56702365

File: 1470854736697.jpg (35KB, 385x375px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 385x375px

>>56706234
fuck yourself jordan

>>56705922
Not even close (if we're talking about PC processors)
In terms of revolutionary processors, the 386 is about king shit.

The next more revolutionary is the original Pentium

Then the Athlon 64

Arguably, the Core2Quad is next

After that it's all incremental advancements.

>>56706271
agreed even sandybridge 2500k is more influential.

>>56701618
Mfw you've only owned one i7 and it was the 920

Mfw you've been out of work since you bought that rig and still can't afford to upgrade

Mfw 6th gen pentium dual cores rape your cpu.

>>56706271
>Arguably, the Core2Quad is next
I want to know who was in charge of naming the core2quad.
You would expect 2 quad cores.

>>56706302
Because before the core2 was the core
The original core was just the evolution of a pentium-m, which was the evolution of the pentium3
Original core was 32bit only.
But the naming of the core2 was pretty shit
but they had prescedent, with the pentium][.

what i7 cpu should i get /g/ for using software synthesizers and daws

>>56706302
To be fair, the Core2duo CPUs were out 6 months before the quad cores.

Also, it was in reference to the core architecture, this being the 2nd iteration.

The naming certainly was shit, but i kinda get it.

>>56706342
>>56706352
Oh okay silly me, didn't realize there was a coreduo.
Because I would have called it the CoreDuo and CoreQuad.
i3/i5/i7 have been reusing front names though.

File: CPU-Z.png (28KB, 407x400px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 407x400px

Oh hai.

Speaking of i7s and Xeons, I have an LGA 1366 board I need to get built up, but the problem is I need to flash the bastard with a newer bios, because the current bios only accepts C0 stepping i7 chips.

Is worth the risk buying ES Xeons to chinks on eBay?

>>56706863
Yea, proccessors don't really die. It's PSU's and HDD's that you need to watch.
Motherboards and gpu's can sometimes be bad eggs if they have been abused.

>>56701618
Xeon is so vague, you mean those Pentium II Xeons? Or even Xeon Phi? You can build a machine with a Celeron and still have a Xeon Phi on it.

>>56704339
Your cleartype setting is in reverse. Are you using your monitor vertically/upside-down?

File: P1fn4sT.png (30KB, 403x402px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 403x402px

I fell for the Skylake meme.

File: Screenshot_20160920-235313.png (435KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

435KB, 1440x2560px

Still strong after so many years

Since i5s don't have hyper threading, and i7s do, wouldn't a task that is only coded to take advantage of 4 threads perform better on the i5? My thinking is that because the workload is distributed across all four cores on the i5, but only two cores are used on the i7 and an i7's cores aren't twice as fast an an i5's cores, then the i5 will be faster because each core is processing less information. Am I missing something? Or am I right?

File: IMG_1943_w_600.jpg (16KB, 600x336px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 600x336px

hey guys

File: ss1.png (48KB, 890x206px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 890x206px

>>56701898
Been using Linux full time for years and somehow never managed to learn about inxl, I've always just use the files in /proc but you learn something new every day. Thanks, anon.

>>56707260
You're wrong.

Hyperthreading is far more complicated than that, but simply put it'll use all 4 physical cores before it attempts to add workload to the 4 extra logical cores. The workload it adds to those HT threads will not run at the full speed of a normal physical core but it will still be able to run yet another workload on a thread. Modern HT is pretty great and the schedulers are on point so the performance overhead on using HT is minimal.


In all apples for apples cases where the same number of threads are being used (4 physical cores worth) they'd perform the same (with deviations between the chips taken into account) and where the i7 was able to use all 8 threads it'd outperform the 4 logical cores - however not by an infinitely large amount.

>>56702005

what's your voltage @ 4.4GHz anon?

I just finished an OC on a 5820k @ 4.4GHz / 1.15V Core

>>56707347
>Infinitely large amount

Jesus I'm tired.

I meant not by a particularly large amount.

It just attempts to jam as much work into a single cycle as it can by utilising any and all available modules.

File: Shrugging guy meme_00.jpg (103KB, 384x313px)

103KB, 384x313px

> tfw your 4690K gets the job done

I don't think I'll need more CPU muscle for the moment.

>>56707347
Thank you for explaining that. That makes sense.

File: 3770K.jpg (338KB, 1280x960px)

338KB, 1280x960px

>>56701618
Any 3770k fags here?
Tell me your OC stats, maggots.

>4.5Ghz
>0.08V offset
>55°C IDLE, 75°C full load

Should I push it to 4.7Ghz?

>>56707554
doesn't count

>>56707100
nope

>>56706292
If you insist on staying with your current mobo, then you can always just pony up 50 bucks and get an x5650 on eBay.

For you, sucking 4-5 dicks on CL might just be sufficient to get the dosh.

>>56701994
BEAUTIFUL!

>>56702674
>caring about RAM speed
good goy

File: cpuz_2016-09-21_02-22-58.png (31KB, 417x414px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 417x414px

I actually don't give a shit so long as the computer I'm using is at an i5 level. But I wanted my laptop to have four cores and so this was my only option.

>>56701618
>daily i7 shilling and consumer thread

>not rocking Nehalem i7
>not having Triple Channel MEME-BOARD

I literally bought the most suped up 1337 socket mobo and a 950 and after all these years im thinking of just getting the x990 as an upgrade so I can still be hipster

>>56708108
>tfw i7 920 on a DX58SO
>tfw 6 GB RAM in Triple Channel

Im gonna upgrade to an x5650 and 12 GBs of RAM soon though

File: Speccy64_2016-09-21_10-22-43.png (50KB, 976x727px)

50KB, 976x727px

>tfw shitpad mustard race
even if you're a poorfag there's no excuse to use a i5 unless you hate your life

File: 9c0.jpg (31KB, 426x341px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 426x341px

>>56701691
Your glorious i7 definitely beats my 4.5GHz/4cores 4690k...

File: Screen Shot 2016-09-21 at 10.46.42.png (47KB, 890x244px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 890x244px

>>56705833
Excellent work Sherlock.

File: IMG_20160907_133301855.jpg (3MB, 2988x5312px)

3MB, 2988x5312px

6700k reporting

Feelsgoodman but I do miss having an all AMD setup. Probably won't be looking into an upgrade Intel Zen + at the very earliest.

That said, 8350 may have reached the end of its rope, but my Fury X just keeps getting better and better.

File: i7.png (27KB, 401x397px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 401x397px

Did I do good?

>>56701618
i have a i7 2700k, is it still good?

thinking of getting a 17 6700 (not k) what do we think?

>>56707562
3770k is a damn good CPU. Not much worse than Haswell. Has just about every feature the 4770k has.

It's a good overclocker, and 4.7 is certainly possible, but you might be at the point were it will need more voltage to achieve more than 4.5.

4.5 is plenty for a while to come.

You scored a whole year before Haswell fags came on the scene.

>>56710569
>thinking of getting a 17 6700 (not k)
An overclocked i5 6600k will easily outperform a 6700 (non-k).

Get an overclockable chip.

>>56707362
thats probably not stable for too much more than desktop use.

I had to push around 1.25v for 4.5GHz, and I use the same voltage for 4.4GHz, though I could probably go slightly lower.

File: celeronchan.png (2KB, 374x40px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 374x40px

I-is c-celeron-chan okay?

File: d77aff8ac9b54a469e02675eae09822d.png (38KB, 412x413px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 412x413px

4700HQ has done it's job pretty admirably for the last 3 years.

About to upgrade to 6800k in the next month or two though.

>>56711229
>6800k
>About to upgrade to 6800k in the next month or two though

Unless you need more than 32GB RAM I think that's a waste. Your processor isn't all that much slower, and more than adequate for just about any task.

Wait for the next enthusiast system. If this is for gaming, just get a better video card to hold you over.

>>56711503
you think a 4700HQ laptop CPU
>isn't all that much slower

You're talking about a 4 core + HT laptop 45w CPU vs a 6 core + HT desktop 140W CPU.

You must think gaming and web browsing is all CPUs are good for

>>56711532
>ou must think gaming and web browsing is all CPUs are good for

Hey all I suggested is waiting for the next generation.

What does he need to do that a new CPU would make a significant improvement?

>>56711634
literally anything that would use that many cores, rendering, encoding, VMs, etc.

The cores are a good 30-40% faster and there are 2 more cores. Its a signficant upgrade, obviously if you dont do anything that will use the CPU power it's wasted, but there are a TON of things that could easily use that CPU power.

File: cpuzXeon.jpg (442KB, 1215x555px)

442KB, 1215x555px

>>56701618

I have a i7 920 and I just got a 980 ti. Is it bottleneting much gpu? Should I overclock it?

>>56711503

Yes, that's not a bad CPU by any means. Actually it's damn good for a laptop.
I'm doing some graphics work and this thing doesn't really cut it anymore, especially now that I'm looking towards learning 3D stuff.
So an upgrade like that will be quite welcome.

>>56711721
i was getting min 40s in bf1 beta, i did a 3.6ghz oc and didnt get below 60s, 920 + 1060

I am posting from my 07 Q6600 comp, still works great for daily use. I think that gen of core2 and sandy bridge are the kings of long term value.

>>56710781
>2016
>doesent know about the non-k oc on skylake

Bow your puny CPUs before the future
http://www.intel.com.au/content/www/au/en/architecture-and-technology/3d-xpoint-unveiled-video.html

I cant believe they solved the memory problem.

>mfw no 5775C in this thread

Y'all niggas don't know what fantastic piece of work this actually is

Iris 6200 man

>>56711904
I like the one guy talking about it as if it is the holy grail of memory, then at the very end the old dude goes, well its CLOSE to the holy grail.


Ideally it would be 5-10x faster, we really would like to see storage only 2-3x slower than DRAM, but we aren't there yet.

>mfw Kaby Lake is for the 1551 socket
Feels very good. I can upgrade a friend's i5-5600 with a beastly i7-7600 or some such in a year or so when he gets some money. I have a 6700k atm.

Intel not changing the socket is a welcome addition.

File: 5775c.png (82KB, 442x597px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 442x597px

>>56711978

>people really giving a shit regarding what central processing unit they use

I use what it works personally since I'm not an autist who cares about strange numbers.

>>56712166
>t. AMD poorfag

>>56712192
>t. cucked by consumerism