Which is the best license? What license do you use for your projects?

>>56641236
GPLv3

Keeps the cucks away

>>56641236
How did you think the GPL works? If you license your own work under the GPL then you fail to include the source code, that'd simply make you a liar.

(A)GPLv3
BSD a shit

>>56641236
>GNU/dad
eberytiem

>>56641236
BSD ant MIT are for cucks
WTFPL is for when you don't care, but then you should use ISC instead
LGPL for libraries and GPLv2 for serious software
AGPL / GAPL for distributed stuff

GPLv3 if you don't want to ruin the planet.
BSD if you don't give a damn

>>56643916
>(A)GPLv3
How can this license even hold up in court? One could through a plugin system have a closed source program involuntarily use a AGPLv3 licensed network service.

>>56644486
>How can this license even hold up in court?
Because copyright laws

>One could through a plugin system have a closed source program involuntarily use a AGPLv3 licensed network service
That's not how the AGPLv3 works.

>>56644355
>ISC
What?

>>56644533
https://opensource.org/licenses/ISC

It's MIT without pretentious phrases, which appeals to me. I hate pretentious faggotry.

Depending on the project, AGPL, MIT, WTFPL

>>56641236
Public domain

>>56641236
>WTFPL
>"Do what the fuck you want"
>"EXCEPT this"

Friendly reminder that WTFPL is not a free license