It's been over a year since the last MBP FFS when will Tim

>>56631868
>falling for internet memes
they're going to remove the headphone jack and call it revolutionary #BacktotheMac

>>56631886
the shell was already leaked months ago

4 USB-C ports and headphone jack but no HDMI and SDXC anymore

>>56631868
They don't care about the proshitters, honey.
They're focusing on tumblrinas now.

>>56631923
>no HDMI
I'm okay with it
>no SDXC
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>56631950
This obnoxiously written post is true. Apple has all but abandoned their professional customer base for people who run out and buy a new iPhone every year. Not only that but they seem to have run out of good ideas for innovation. Probably fired the good idea guy or something.

>>56631868

October.

google.com

>>56631988
>obnoxiously written post
That's the joke.

>>56631988
>Probably fired the good idea guy or something.
Probably died of all the cancer

>>56631868
Razer did it first :^)

>>56631923
>HDMI
It never even had an HDMI port..

File: apple-macbook-pro-15-retina-display-2012-review-09.jpg (24KB, 900x422px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 900x422px

>>56632046
ok

>>56632046
The MBP has HDMI, even the 13" one.

>>56631868
Whoa, that's a sick concept. Not really too useful, but I love it.

>TFW want a Mac
>Would only just end up installing Linux and windows on it
>Cant justify spending £1000 on a computer while my £200 T430s is functioning perfectly
>Will probably just get another used thinkpad when this fails.

>>56632211
>>Would only just end up installing Linux and windows on it
Retarded

>>56632287
>Ur use case is retarded

All my analysis software works on windows only, all my personal shit I do on linux


Kys macfag.

Will they increase the price? If the Pro gets lighter and thinner I might consider the base 13" model to replace my 2010 MacBook Air, but only if it stays at the same price (or lower).

>>56632375
So then why would you even want a Mac? Why wouldn't you use a VM? You're just a retard.

Kys, retard.

File: 1441872289910.jpg (45KB, 284x251px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 284x251px

>>56632558
They look pretty dumbfuck

>>56632375
Why won't you do your personal stuff on OSX?

>tfw going to sell macbook pro 13 for $700 (small scratch on screen and scuff on the side)
>tfw going to sell gayming pc for $600 (i3, 950, 480GB SSD)
>will buy space grey macbook pro and be comfy as fuck

>>56632046
you fell for the /g/ meme, my friend.

>>56632825
You're such a fucking retard, don't even kill yourself. Just keep being a miserable loser with no friends so you can suffer and then die.

>>56631868
They're still trying to find a way to make it thin enough to see through

>>56632914
You don't like the looks of a Mac?

Why are you even in this thread?

>>56632879
I prefer using Linux for banking stuff.
Programming etc. Again, I prefer Linux.

Thats about all i do really

Otherwise I probably could....

>>56632981
You're terrified of technology and need a fruity kids toy instead of a real computer? Why are you even on this board?

>>56632996
Are you retarded?

Serious question. I'm failing to understand why someone would purposefully act like they have mental problems.

>>56633063
>insists on shilling tonka toys on a technology board

You have mental problems kid. Should probably get that checked out.

>>56632981
>You don't like the looks of a Mac?
I have a MacBook
>Why are you even in this thread?
To wonder why someone would buy one to use fucking Windows or Linux on it.

>>56631868
Man, that calendar app is so beautiful. Is there anything even close to that design for Linux? Google Calendar is shit, with all the horrible thick borders, and what not.

>>56633097
Some people have the unfortunate tragedy of ending up with a mac, but they can at least salvage it somewhat by wiping the toddlerOS and installing something better.

>tfw my boss' brother in law who works at Apple keeps telling him to wait to upgrade
>he still has a 2013 MacBook Air
>already uses a USB splitter for the 5 things he plugs into it

Oh, he's going to be mad.

>>56633165
Does this guy ever miss a thread?

>>56633163
the most beautiful OS in the world

>>56632825
Fucking cataract-chan

>>56631988
Funny that they actually did, read about Scott Forstall

>>56633097
You find it difficult to understand why someone would run windows on a macbook, despite me just fucking telling you that I have windows only analysis software.

Are you thick?

>>56632375
Get a T460p

>>56631868
I fucking hate that MBP fan design, OP.
If the new MBP looks like the Macbook, I will freak!

>>56631868
the last decent MBP was mid-2012 anyways

>>56633784
Are you retarded? Do you know what virtualization is?

>>56634690
That's not how you spell Late 2013.

>>56632168
Too bad it's a fan render and the final design won't be anything like that.

It's gonna be the same shit as those volume controls on old HP notebooks or the function row on that one Lenovo thinkpad that everyone hated.

Except since it's Apple, sheep will call it revolutionary and then it'll be shoved down our throats by every other manufacturer.

>>56634820
Listen dickhead, If I wanted my fucking seismic analysis to take 3 hours instead of 1.5, I'd virtualise, but I don't have time for that shit.

Now fuck off and go kill yourself.

>>56635060
Christ you're such a retard. Who the fuck does seismic analysis on a fucking laptop?

>>56635240
I do, when I'm travelling.

>I have to tell this guy he's using his computer wrong reeeeeeee

Mong.

You fucking autist, you should literally kill yourself as soon as possible so that you don't accidentally procreate and force more burden on the rest of humanity.

>>56636196
I don't care what you do with your laptop. You bitch about the mythical extra time doing the analysis in a VM would take and yet you're using a fucking laptop.

I wish that was the new thing, It looks nice and puts away shit from the screen

I have to ask:

Is there anything on linux that has a fully customizable bar where you can see shit random shit like this? For instance, that download bar?

>>56636260
Cool. I'll buy a Mac desktop, install a VM on it, install windows in a VM, hook up a car battery and carry it on the train with me.

Why didn't I think about this simple solution before hand.

Could you recommend a trolley for my car battery and desktop senpai?

>>56636397
I can recommend you ways to maim yourself, you obtuse tranny.

File: 1451306232326.jpg (167KB, 405x412px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 405x412px

>>56636430
>macfag
>calling someone else a tranny

>>56636196
Why are you even arguing with iFans?
You do know they are all retarded, right?

>>56636430
No I said trolley recommendations you illiterate fucktard.

>>56636474
I'm actually stunned how retarded you are.

File: tb20-10.jpg (82KB, 850x598px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 850x598px

>>56636397
You are now aware that this is an actual product.

>>56633097
>>56634820
>>56635240
>>56636260
>>56636430
>being this butthurt
>i dnt care wat u do with ur laptop
>half a dozen posts caring about what someone does with their laptop
>immediately running with personal insults
fucking hilarious.

kys

File: CM8A2722-27-inch-imac-case-510x500.jpg (78KB, 510x500px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 510x500px

>>56636397
>>56636495

And even this.

>>56636515
Please point to where I gave half a fuck about this nigga's laptop.

At best I cared about his reasoning behind doing retarded shit, which was equally retarded.

>>56636491
Oh, i see.

I'm retarded, I agree.

I shouldn't be using a trolley

I didn't realise that the custom is to carry it around in a mong-bag like these.

>>56636495
>>56636526

>>56636550
>responding
>I dnt careeee reeeeeee
>you can tell I don't care, even through I care about his reasoning hurr durrr

spastic.

>>56635060
>3 hours instead of 1.5, I'd virtualise

If it does that, you've set it up wrong. Your processor supports cutting almost all of that extraction out of the way. God, I hate you tech illiterate faggots clogging up my board.

File: 1458575952377.jpg (70KB, 600x500px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 600x500px

>>56636495
>>56636526
Oh man I need one of those. It would make my daily commute to starbucks so much easier.

>>56636565
Ight retard. Good reading comprehension.

>>56636566
>extraction
>calls someone else tech illiterate
>mactoddlers

>>56632981
>I prefer using Linux for banking stuff.
Programming etc. Again, I prefer Linux

Nearly any program you use on Linux will be available for OSX too. And you won't have to deal with buggy DEs.

>>56636495
Literally use this exact case every day when taking iMacs on shoots, nothing quite like a 27" 5k display.
Sure we use Macbooks as well but not for proper photo editing

>>56636578
>tfw I use a computer slightly differently to someone on the internet and they get offended by it

bahahahaahhahahahhaahha

>>56636590
I'm not gonna proof-read my shitposts in a macfag thread. Its a waste of my time to even post in them, tbph. Half of them cant even read.

>implying I'd be caught dead with a mac

File: 1447123719874.png (227KB, 1182x765px) Image search: [Google]

227KB, 1182x765px

>>56636607
>using macshit period for any kind of photowork

Hobbyist/amateurs and/or hipster morons detected.

>>56636621
lmao'ing at ur life

>>56636634
Yea that probably matters if you use aRGB.

>>56636607
>nothing quite like a 27" 5k display.

Is it the glare?

>taking a glossy screen on location.
>using a glossy screen period.

File: 1470384355587.png (447KB, 689x679px) Image search: [Google]

447KB, 689x679px

>>56636662
>only adobe rgb matters

Macs are a fucking joke. And so are """"""""""""""""""""pros""""""""""""""""" that use macshit.

>>56636681
>only adobe rgb matters
Uh, no. What? Who said that? 78% aRGB coverage doesn't matter if you don't use aRGB, which most people do not.

>>56636634
Well obviously not, final color correction is done back in the company photo editing room. This is just for reviewing and on the fly tweaks and notes
>>56636672
Glossy makes shots look better for our art directors and anyone else who doesn't know better

>>56636681
True that.

Bet he uses a fucking Canon as well, lol.

File: 1459266683323.png (273KB, 1182x765px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 1182x765px

>>56636712
>aRGB coverage doesn't matter if you don't use aRGB, which most people do not.
>b-b-b-b-but im a pro photo guy! really i am!!!!111

Is there anything more cringey than a mactard that thinks he's a """""""professional""""""""?

>>56636786
Dude, did you actually believe he takes an iMac to shoots?

>>56636803
>Dude, did you actually believe he takes an iMac to shoots?

see >>56636572

>>56636748
Well, it's portraiture so of course we use Hasselblad CFV-50c's and Leicas

>>56636836
this was way too easy

>>56636855
>rangefinder
>portraiture

File: 1454396494098.jpg (64KB, 480x640px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 480x640px

>>56636855
>macs
>walmart portraits

Explains everything.

File: 281.jpg (2MB, 2000x1336px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2000x1336px

>>56636894

>>56636786
I'm not sure if you think color depth and color space are completely dependent on each other what, but 100% sRGB coverage is 100%. I never said I was a pro photographer, either.

>>56636929
shit pic

>>56636910
I said iMacs, not eMacs

>>56636929
Christ that looks like fucking shit. No wonder you're fine with using Macs. You're already near blind.

File: whatever.gif (2MB, 200x223px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 200x223px

>>56636949

>>56636969
I'm not a photographer
Also just a googled example from an M240

>>56636993
Don't reply. He does this literally every thread for hours on end.

>>56636929
That's not a portrait.

But the photographer did fail to exclude that barbecue in the lower left corner so it probably was a rangefinder.

>>56631988
Photographers hold on to their MBPs for years and years. They don't buy new computers as often as tumblrinas. So they can use a card reader and enjoy their stripped down Lightroom.

>>56636993
>I'm not a photographer

We already knew that when you said you actually use Macshit for any kind of photo work.

File: 502.jpg (2MB, 2000x1336px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2000x1336px

>>56637042
Yeah, that was a bad example

>>56636929
>>56636949
i have to agree
its a neat effect but looks shitty

File: 1459745557013.jpg (58KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 400x400px

>>56637075

>>56637075
>are some people retarded?
yes

>does that mean using a short lens for portraits is now a good idea?
no

>>56631988
>Probably fired the good idea guy or something.
Uh, he kinda died...

File: how mac users take screenshots.jpg (560KB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

560KB, 3264x2448px

>>56637075
>>56636929
>apple "professionals"

>>56637136
Is he taking a screenshot?

Why doesn't he just use his iPhone like 99% of mac users?

>>56637157
kek

>>56637052
most people like macs because they reproduce colour well enough. I have lenovos and am considering getting a mbp solely for retouching purposes

>>56637314
>reproduce colour well enough
>well enough
>when better screens are available
>some at cheaper prices even

This is why you will always be an amateur. You don't give a single shit about your work.

File: ColorMunkiSmile-328.png (87KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 400x300px

>>56637314

and again:
>glossy screen
>photo editing
Just buy a thinkpad.

File: 1455618130764.jpg (364KB, 800x1316px) Image search: [Google]

364KB, 800x1316px

>>56637482
>matte screen
>photo editing

I dislike Macs as much as the next person, but photo editing is one of the only instances where glossy is better, not because of the gloss shit, but its transparency. And done inside in a dim room, on a real color accurate UltraSharp or some other high end monitor like a semi-gloss PLS.

>>56637722
Ultrashaps are matte
And so are, to my knowledge, all high-end monitors.

Plus you should never edit in a dark room because your eyes must have a reference to judge the color temperature by.
Any white balance will look perfectly fine after staring at it and nothing else for some a while.

>>56637770
UltraSharps offer TrueLife as an option, which is just their marketing speech for glossy.

File: r5rhws6y4.png (457KB, 811x471px) Image search: [Google]

457KB, 811x471px

>bought 2013 MBP for $1k
>didn't get retina screen

meme'd myself hard

but I still use it daily

File: 1471943476066.jpg (208KB, 988x802px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 988x802px

>>56637812
>bought 2013 MBP
>meme'd myself hard

You sure did.

>>56637770
>And so are, to my knowledge, all high-end monitors.
Obviously because you have no knowledge.

I'm more interested in the Mac Mini, honestly.

I would love to have my Windows box plus a Mac just to have it.

T