Can an AI (ASI to be more specific) ever have the creative power of a human bean?
Yes probably
>>56617945
I cant draw any weird imaginary characters that haunt my dreams
>human bean
>>56617894
This remind me of bean boy
>>56617894
>ever
Yes
>when
Who knows. 2100?
>>56617894
Certainly of some human brains.
Most /g/tards, for instance.
>>56617894
>neural network
Has a great potential combined with the sheer amount of data found on internet, indexed by Google and computed on botneted windows / highjacked supercomputer's power.
You can train it in all
>art of any sorts which can be put into digital form
>technology solutions in various ways (ever though about how car's / plane's body is designed?)
>designs of various objects
were ever made in human history and tell it to produce more combinations then are the molecules in the known universe
then all these "prototypes" sort by some fitness functions, based on:
critique of said art found online
sales of such product
clever functions which likes "simpler / easier to produce / more robust / any other ability you want to"
another neural network trained only to evaluate "beauty / practicality"
if it still produce 10E9999+ garbage, put it into some "fun" genetic heuristic algorithms, put more restraints, and soon before you know it, you have new designs / art whatever. If we ever accomplish describing our language by strict rules, we can even go into heavy literature generated by computers which will actually make sense and will be interesting.
This won't be happening before programming is as basic skill as reading / writing / math are now.