Hey /g/ I am learning to program webpages and program css A

bait thread

what I'd like to know is whether you're a butthurt webdev or a smug cs student?

I think this is actually possible. I'm on my phone right now otherwise I'd attempt it.
Make a div and inside that div place 100 divs with a number inside each one (1, 2, 3, ...). Then with CSS, you can do something like, div.container::nth-child(15n) {
content: 'fizzbuzz';
}
And so on.

File: fcku.gif (2MB, 299x152px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 299x152px

>>56595200
yes fckn bait shit

>>56595229
what the hell are you talking about? what the hell you did write there?

>>56595150
1. HTML and CSS is not programming
2. Learn HTML and CSS
3. Learn JS and if needed PHP
4. Thats all you need, nothing else
5. You're a fgt

/thread

>>56595286
CSS and HTML is Turing complete.

Css has an n-th child feature which you can use to filter for your fizzbuzz conditionals

>>56595325
>CSS and HTML is Turing complete
no

>>56595367

Err... yes, actually. Separately, they are not turing complete. Together, however, they have been used to implement a Rule 110 cellular automaton, which is known to be turing complete.

>>56595150
Yes, you code and compile it first in Photoshop

>>56595654
Explain to me how they are turing complete, i.e. how they together satisfy the criteria.

Don't give me an example because that doesn't prove anything.

>>56595763

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_110#The_proof_of_universality

>>56595888
you didn't answer my question

>>56595900
>being this edgy
Must be mad op knowing his thread failed miserably

>>56596021
not OP, I'm just waiting for you to put forth a reasonable argument to support your claim that CSS and HTML are turing complete, which so far you haven't.

>>56596042
>im so edgy i have to argue about the trueness of a fact because he didnt spoonfeed me and i cant comprehend wikipeda

>>56596110
>I won't provide proof to my argument because I know it's false :DDDD

File: damage_control.jpg (101KB, 650x650px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 650x650px

>>56596128
>I'll ignore any proof handed to me and claim there wasn't any

>>56596163
This
Guy is fucking autist

>>56595900
>>56595763

This is the rule110 automaton: http://eli.fox-epste.in/rule110-full.html, you can see the source code for yourself.

You can reduce Turing machine to Tag system, Tag system to Cycic Tag system, and Rule 110 to Cyclic tag to Rule 110.
Asshown in >>56595900
and https://www.wolframscience.com/nksonline/page-678-text

Holy shit, web devs are fucking retarded.

Enjoy pretending to your friends you know shit, because no one on /g/ is fooled.

> you guys

>>56595150
Yep, just use javascript tags in your html

<script>
document.body.innerHtml = "hello world ! ";
</script>

>>56596981
he said html and css fuking RETARD

>>56597010
>html

Can you point out where he mentioned HTML?