Does every computer and part manufacturer use slave/child labor

If those children didn't have jobs they'd be starving to death. Fuck off with your emotional bullshit.

>>56574324
If they're not employing child labor, they're committing serious crimes with the extraction of necessary minerals.

If it says "Made in China" then it means that it was made in a slave labor shop

File: richard_irl.jpg (69KB, 720x667px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 720x667px

>>56574333
Holy shit this.

>>56574324
>Does every computer and part manufacturer use slave/child labor in one way or another?
Probably.

>slave labor
Who the fuck manufactures in africa or the sandlot?

>child labor
So what? Their alternatives are farm work, begging, theft, prostitution, or being poorer.


Anyone know anything about the working conditions in other big companies like AMD, Asus, Dell, Intel, MSI, and others?
Who cares? By trying to do moral grand standing, you are only going to make the lives of third world shits worse.

Use your head you faggot.

>>56574358
>they're committing serious crimes with the extraction of necessary minerals.
You do realize that anything below the top soil isn't important, right?

File: 7.png (91KB, 255x475px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 255x475px

>>56574333
>>56574396
>unironically defending child labor

File: george w bush.jpg (9KB, 220x200px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 220x200px

>>56574560
>unironically buying marxist memes

>>56574560
Nobody said that. But due to the shitty government where those kids live in they have no choice but to work or die. Of course depriving kids of an education and a shot at being someone in life is bad but there is nothing we can do about it.

>>56574595
>if I don't approve of child exploitation I'm a Marxist

>>56574607
After having explained why child labor isn't bad, you still think its bad.
Yeah, I think you're probably a marxist.

>>56574607
>>56574630
To clarify, with an analogy:
Unclean water is less than ideal. Having no water is worse.
You're solution to unclean water would be to have people die of thirst.

File: 1470964416039.jpg (13KB, 370x370px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 370x370px

>>56574630
You're a fucking dumbass, lmao. Read your own text out loud. Get your head out of your ass.

>>56574701
What the hell do you want from autistic fucks like him? Look at those SJW, they have no idea about the world and just ramp about.

File: aygtmb.jpg (37KB, 415x570px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 415x570px

>>56574729

>slave/child labor


Getting paid =/= slave labor

The only reason Asia's economy and people have prospered is because of these jobs especially in China. Work in general in someway or another is borderline slavery but that's how the system works.

100 years ago and even before then a mother and the daughter done housework including laundry, cleaning, dishes, preparing dinner, grocery shopping while the father worked and the son would chop firewood or tend to crops/livestock. Working conditions are relative to your general conditions. Why would you treat some rice farmer like he's an executive in a fortune 500 company?

>>56574607
>I am against the exploitation of workers by the bourgeois
>I am not a Marxist tho

Ok whatever you say. I think you have your head so far up your arse that you're almost reaching the singularity.

>>56574805
>>Work in general in someway or another is borderline slavery
>having to put more effort than just breathing into sustaining your life
>borderline slavery

I don't know if your changing your words to get the lad to not go into commie drone mode, but I hope you're not being sincere.

File: 6.png (132KB, 371x437px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 371x437px

>>56574832
>being against shitty working conditions makes me a commie

File: image.jpg (49KB, 599x355px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 599x355px

>>56574333
Pretty much this. If the damn liberals hadn't ruined the country it could be American youth who were gainfully employed.

Aw shit, the level of idiotic in this thread is amusing! Continue please!

File: costanza.webm (1MB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 640x480px

>>56574863
You're free to pay them money to do nothing...
But you would rather steal other people's money to do that, right?

>>56574863
You explicitly said that children are being exploited through allowing them to work for compensation.

Just admit that you're a Marxist and we can move on. You're really not impressing anyone by trying to strawman in desperation.

more reasonable question, any 100% (minus raw mats) us made shit?

>>56574899
Fuck you, the only people who should be allowed to work are 22 year olds with college degrees - possibly even only 24-25 year olds with a Masters. This is a knowledge economy and everybody is awesome, happy and rich as fuck because of it.

Anybody under the age of 22 is a child and shouldn't be burdened with thought or labor. Unless you're male, then you can be 18 and decide to die in a war - that's always alright.

File: footmen1.jpg (19KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 320x240px

>>56574324
There is nothing wrong with Child Labor, Liberals and Marxists demonized it, so now every child has to go to school...as a result schools can't do their best to educate the child which means everyone suffers. This is why public schooling fails and private schools are superior. Anything Socialist is destined to fail, and anything capitalist is destined to succeed, but it must be Laissez faire because the government has NO RIGHT telling a business what to do in any way.

It's better that the kid learns a skill at work than drive down society by keeping the brightest children from getting the education they deserve. Besides, it has been proven that poor people are dumber than rich people, so why waste money on them? Put them to work.

You can't offer a service off the tax payer dime and expect a quality result.

File: defending-freedom-comic.jpg (184KB, 952x260px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 952x260px

>>56575975
private school'd children come out socially awkward and shitty, you learn something about life in public schools, just tell the difference between a public schooler and. a private schooler, one has friends and knows more about life and one has no friends and fucking buys into socialism, I would know, I went to a private school after predominately doing public schooling and it was lonely and I felt like I was in some shitty fabricated "perfect society" literally like socialism, we were all tought to our abilities and everything was all spongy squeaky clean, any speaking out is unheard of, public schooling doesnt do that socialism bullshit and makes you less of an awkward fucker, child labor is fine as long as it isnt in bad conditions and the child's health isn't deteriorating or taking away from his/her life in a physical or mental way

>>56576100
>you learn something about life in public schools
I didn't.
Public school was torture for me and killed my desire to learn and try for the fun of it.

You know what it was that did it?
9 years of reviewing the same material, all because there were sub-humans who couldn't grasp basic math or reading.
You can only be retaught things so many years before your desire to learn dies. You can only be given busy work for so long until you stop caring.


>we were all taught to our abilities
So efficiently and productively...
Well rounded is a meme used to steal funding from math and science.
(ex: People are trying to pass STEAM (A:arts) off as the new STEM because no one wants to waste money on art)

Children are quite capable of learning and understanding calculus if you get the idiots out the way and just let them learn.
Students being taught to their abilities sounds amazing.


>everything was all spongy squeaky clean
Implying a bad thing?

>any speaking out is unheard of
Implying a bad thing? What is there to speak out against?


>tl;dr
Let those who are gifted succeed and let those who are literally retarded (sub-85 IQ) learn a trade.
What point is there in bringing everyone down to the same level?

>tl;dr tl;dr
Stop wasting the potential of others so that sub-humans are slightly less stupid.

>>56576100
Public school DOES do the socialism bullshit though.

The people who buy into socialism are usually college educated. It's not normal school where you get indoctrinated with that. You get the preparation there, but full on indoctrination is college territory.

It just so happens that private schooled children tend to end up in colleges more. The fact that they don't have life experience being around actual poor people helps them see them as lesser humans which is a prerequisite for socialist mindset.

>>56574333
>slave labour is emotionally bad so, you are dumb for being against it
>however, starving to death is also emotionally bad, so you should be happy it doesn't happen

rev up those fallacies, son

>>56574324
this isn't slave labor, this is the Chinese being smart as fuck and creating a monopoly that's going to paying off big time

>>56574333
TRIPS CONFIRM LADS
/THREAD

>>56574911
>>56574917
>not advocating for a NatSoc gov that wouldn't allow children, as a resource, to be used so inefficiently and disposably

Tell me again who's the Marxist you dumb cuck.

>>56574324
Yes, because components are sourced from many countries and that inevitably includes sweatshops. Now you can buy Fujitsu (made in Japan/Germany), Panasonic (made in Japan), or VAIO (made in Japan) if you want to be slightly more ethical by knowing it was assembled nicely at least.

File: Karl Marx and his chair.jpg (383KB, 639x910px) Image search: [Google]

383KB, 639x910px

>>56576792
>implying communism and socialism are meaningfully different
Are you sure you're not a closet chair fetishist?

File: 1472923255994.jpg (60KB, 850x400px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 850x400px

>>56574333
What an idiot cattle, if you really believe that.
Good goyim brainwashing in effect.

>>56574436
>Groundwater isn't important

Not to mention:
>Effluent from mining has no environmental impact

Ok kid.

>>56574805
>>56574848
wage slavery is only different to chattel slavery in that you get to choose your master and in that you get to go home on the weekend. In many other ways, it's essentially the same. Your work is done at somebody elses command, you don't get to control how or why it's done, or what happens with the fruits of your labor. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sSSCWAjsc7M

>>56574324
With regards to that picture, if any of the free market myths were actually true, these people would have been replaced with machines long time ago. I recently worked in a factory for clock parts for a month, the work was nothing but putting some pieces onto a machine and taking them away from some other machine when the machine was finished with them. Purely mechanical labor. Some people I've spoken to there have been doing that job for 17 years, and this was in one of the wealthiest countries on the planet, meaning the wage was literally about 3 to 4 times the US minimum wage, not cheap labor. Meaning that if there was any market pressure from competition *at all*, these jobs would have been replaced with much more cost-effective machines a long-time ago. Which they did not. Extremely inefficient.
Which on a macro-scale, sooner or later will lead us to this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvgdtF3y0Ss

>>56577995
>posts some quote from a fat mudslime

You're doing this wrong

>>56578519
He's not a muslim.

>>56579092
But he is a Semite.