good thing we got rid of that annoying headphone jack so we could make room for more local storage in our products
>oh right.... the jews...
They got rid of it so they could fit 22% more vaporwave on it.Check my 3.
but now iphones have better batteries
oh wait https://www.thrillist.com/tech/nation/iphone-7-battery-life-still-an-issue-for-apple
ayyyyyyy
Galaxy S7 it is for me then.
how much longer are people going to fall for the upgraded camera meme?
No 16GB option anymore and battery life was increased thanks to the removal of the headphone jack
Stay losing OP
>>56564544
>>56564544
> battery life was increased thanks to the removal of the headphone jack
Bluetooth drains approximately 6000% more battery
I could listen music for up to 6 hours on just 5% of battery, with bluetooth I could listen less than five minutes
Daily reminder that Xiaomi makes a phone with the same size and more than double the battery.
>>56564634
math is hard... can you make this easier for me to understand?
>>56564634
[citation needed]
>>56564544
>Better battery with Bluetooth
>You being this dumb
Typical apple cultist
>>56564692
Need a citation on Bluetooth using significantly more energy than a headphone jack
>>56564781
Heres the source [1]
>Every single person that has ever used bluetooth on their phone
>>56564453
>They got rid of the headphone jack
>"Its the thickest D-type body yet!"
>>56564836
This isn't working out too well for you
>>56564886
Did they disable google on your crapple device?
>>56564964
Proving your claims is your job
>>56564886
Are you retarded? If you want to argue about this just say that you can use lightning earphones or lightning to 3.5.
Using a wireless technology uses more power than not using it.
>>56565072
But really, no one cares about 1% more power.