>$159.00 >(one hundred and fifty-nine dollars) Have Apple

>COURAGE
>GOTTA LOVE DOLAN DUCK
yeah, no.

This is what no headphone jack gets you

>>56499263
Nah. iCucks will buy it. Apple knows who butters their bread.

+tax
+tip
+cancer

>>56499263
it's The Future, though

File: 1473364762078s.jpg (21KB, 250x250px)

21KB, 250x250px

Its the next big thing

File: duck.jpg (56KB, 549x392px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 549x392px

>>56499263

>$159.00

Nope, it's a steal.

This board is so fucking shit. Filled with autist Drumpfkins flooding in from /pol/. Nobody gives a shit about your outdated tech, how long has headphone jacks existed? It's not the fucking 19th century anymore, it's time to move on. Yeah, you didn't think touchscreen phones would work either. And for a while, they didn't. Until they did. Because apple pushed that technology forward.

This is the future they're making. Get on board or get left behind you pathetic permavirgins.

File: cat bath.gif (1MB, 240x180px)

1MB, 240x180px

>>56499422
tasty bait there

$159 for wireless earbuds is a pretty good deal. You can argue if you need them or not but the price point is correct.

I will want to see them in person before I bought but I will likely end up getting them.

>>56499504
>pretty good deal
Depends on the quality of their sound. Knowing apple, they're terrible.

>>56499504
How is it a good deal you dumbass? You can get decent bluetooth earbuds for much cheaper than that, that don't look half as retarded as these toothbrush looking motherfuckers do

File: 1275786914074.jpg (57KB, 586x459px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 586x459px

>>56499351

I never liked Jobs but, god damn, he definitely was the filter that cut out the crap. For this he gets my begrudging respect.

File: coltan-INLINE3.jpg (113KB, 912x608px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 912x608px

>>56499263
Guess what, coltan is expensive this days.

>>56499422
>outdated tech
Stfu, do you actually think wireless is better than cable???

File: ressentiment_v1_070.jpg (105KB, 728x1031px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 728x1031px

>>56499554
Why use flash in 2016?

>>56499263

There are other 200+ wireless headphones.

>>56499263
>be me
>go to apple store
>get violently but raped by idragon dildo
>squeal in pain
>store assistant kindly informs me ilube is sold separately
>mfw apple only let me lube up my cock with it
>workingasintended.mp3

Can't wait for the idragon dildo s next year

>>56499504
I got three pairs of Bluetooth chinkshit for $5 each and they have great sound

>>56499581
Are you telling me you never use Wifi?

Or transfer files over a network?

Or make calls using anything that isn't a land line?

It's the same thing as when apple removed the CD drive from there computers. Everyone complained at first, but eventually people realized how obsolete cd's actually were.

And they aren't requiring you to use the EarPods, they are still shipping with wired headphones that go into the lightning port. And so far people are saying the quality is vastly superior to regular headphones.

File: pencil-goes-in-the-ass.jpg (37KB, 992x744px)

37KB, 992x744px

>>56499263
Well they sold a goddamn pencil for $99, and a keyboard for $169, so no doubt tons of retards will buy this crap.

>>56499263
The $200 stylus was already pushing it too far

>>56499833
>It's the same thing as when apple removed the CD drive from there computers

No, it's not the same thing. Stop regurgitating what other's have said and use your brain.

>>56499833
So you can either listen to music OR charge your phone. The cable has fuck all to do with sound quality, sound quality comes from the quality of the speakers.

>so far people are saying the sound quality is better

There's a video on YouTube of someone walking down the street with a current hen iPhone claiming it was the new model, people where saying how much lighter, thinner and faster than their current one, even after comparing the two side by side.

Moral of the story the average iPhone user has an iq of about 4, they will believe anything positive you tell them about apple without question

File: 18d6de8f-7cc8-4867-96b8-b1cc481cbeea..jpg (17KB, 325x287px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 325x287px

>>56499422

File: two hundred smasung wireless.png (414KB, 1001x863px)

414KB, 1001x863px

>>56499263
Samsung's are $199
ONE HUNDRED NINETY NINE

and they look like total shit made out of shitty plastic and look at the fucking seams and die casing marks.

>>56500008
>current hen iPhone claiming it was the new model

I think it was worse than that anon, it was a 1st gen iPhone, which makes it even worse.

>>56500032
It may have been, watched it some time ago so details are a little sketchy

>>56500023

>$200 in ear headphones

at least they wont fall out as easy, plus you won't look like a closet homosexual. Samshit is also a disgusting brand though. Highly overrated.

>Galaxy A9 to USA when?

>>56500149
>>56500032
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sfkbxzilVC4

>>56499525
>>56499540
>>56499769

It all depends on what they sounds like and their build quality. I want to read some reviews about them before I would buy them.

>>56499263
>shit sound and bad ergonomic just like Earpod
>$120 more

>>56499422
>b-but CURRENT YEAR

Yeah nearly every piece of audio equipment on the world have a 3.5mm jack or plug but somehow it needs to be replaced with shit that gets 5 hours of usage out of a single charge.

>>56499422
>19th century equals 19XXs

Back to school.

>>56499833
Dude.

A cable is WAY better.

A cable means the adda convertor and amp are in the phone itself which means there is more space to get quality parts.

For wireless headphones, to get your digital signal to actual audio it needs to be send with bluetooth to a reciever. The reciever then needs to convert the digital signal to an analog one. Then the signal needs to be amplified untill it can hit the speakers.

+ you need a battery to power it all

And since you can't cheat physics means that this will lead to:
- battery life will be shit
- you pay for parts already in your phone
- the audio will have a lot of artifacts from the shitty conversion (jitter etc)
- signal to noise ratio will be shit
- frequency and transient response will be shit
- etc.

There's reason good amps and convertors are build in big boxes and are properly cooled.

File: 1470487845743.gif (48KB, 2034x1491px)

48KB, 2034x1491px

>>56499422
How much does Apple pay you for each post again? Last time I checked there social media program it was $0.03.

A man's gotta eat it seems

>>56500365
this, thank you.

>>56500365
This.

Wireless headphone sound quality is basically shit because the technology simply cannot work the same as the plug.

File: energizer-powerbank-blue.jpg (42KB, 847x757px)

42KB, 847x757px

>introducing the new airpod power bank only $99 + tax!

>>56500494
Shit that's cheap for an apple product would pay $200 for that easy

>>56499422
CURRENT YEAR

File: current year.jpg (30KB, 367x390px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 367x390px

>>56499422

>>56500494
>Not making it dildo shaped so it can be inserted into your anus easier

Do you even Apple?

>>56499422
COME ON

>>56499422
DONT THINK ABOUT WHY JUST GIVE APPLE YOUR MONEY

File: 1471914950042.jpg (439KB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

439KB, 1920x1200px

I'd actually be willing to pay for these if I ever used my phone for music. The features like turning off the music when you take them out, tapping into Siri without taking out your phone and connecting them without it being tedious as fuck like regular Bluetooth devices are all great and practical features.

>>56499992
>No, it's not the same thing.

Except it is.

Right now it is inconvenient because the headphones market hasn't 100% shifted to accommodate the new lightning ports or wireless. However in a few years, we will start seeing headphones with higher quality audio than what was possible with a standard headphones jack, and we will wonder why we waited to long to make the change.

Just like when you compare getting something off of a cd to downloading it off of the internet.

File: 1466209293033.jpg (49KB, 634x356px)

49KB, 634x356px

I'll be enjoying these soon, using Siri in my ear to iMessage the chick I'll bang later while I currently bang another chick. Feels fucking good to be in the Apple ecosystem and not in the Xxd4rkl0rdxX/PajeetROM lagging botnet shitfest.

File: 1473295015396.png (51KB, 299x566px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 299x566px

CONSUUUUUUMMME MEEEE!!

>>56500850
>Except it is.

It is not in the slightest. You rely on simplistic reasoning to arrive at that conclusion. You see something old (CD & 3.5mm jack) and conclude that is has outlived its usefulness. In the case of CD-ROM, you would be correct because there was something better to replace it. That is not so with wireless headphones. You even allude to this in your explanation:

>However in a few years, we will start seeing headphones with higher quality audio than what was possible with a standard headphones jack

In a few years? You can get wireless audio now; it still isn't any "better" or more convenient (wireless standard, battery life, charging etc.) than the 3.5mm jack, which is ubiquitous. There was no need to get rid of it. You could have had both.

Keep swallowing the Apple-cum.

>>56500808
Until you find out it looks like you're wearing earrings.

>>56500850

See >>56500365

Cable is better than wifi, yeah so what?
If you are listening to music on a phone you already dont care about quality.

>>56499422
>Drumpfkins
Lmao

How's it feel to instantly discredit anything you said with this bullshit?

>>56500939
>In a few years? You can get wireless audio now; it still isn't any "better" or more convenient (wireless standard, battery life, charging etc.)

Lighting based headphones are able to draw more power for the phones, allowing for more powerful Hi-fi headphones/earpods without needing a separate charge in the device.


>Wireless isn't better
Not yet, the market hasn't been large enough for them to push the technology yet, but it will be now that every other phone manufacturer will more than likely follow in Apples footsteps

>Or more convenient
For some people it is, especially people who work out with headphones on.

>You could have had both.
I'll take a larger battery over ancient tech

>>56501052
Battery life

File: leo.jpg (9KB, 219x239px)

9KB, 219x239px

>>56501248

>If they pay a penny or two pence more for the readiness of them...let them look to that, a fool and his money is soon parted.

Ya know, people give the Jews a lot of stick, but really, they just take advantage of the criminally stupid out there. Case in point.

For $160 you can get some pretty decent wired headphones.

I have to hand it to Apple, though. I really thought that they were going to sell some wireless Beats headphones for $150. But it turned out that $150 is for their shitty low end earphones that probably sound no better than dollar store stuff.

File: 1473364762078.jpg (68KB, 786x986px)

68KB, 786x986px

great design

>>56501377
Whatever you say grandpa, keep holding on that "Good ol fashion technology". I'm sure your loyal phone companies won't cave into apples pressure...Right? Just like with physical keyboards?

Are newer earpods any better than their old pieces of shit?

I hope apple swindles these cucks out of billions.

I have never bought an apple product.

ever.

Do we know if they use bluetooth or something else?

>>56500724
uhhm, some of us prefer it in the pussy instead...

>>56501548
Touch screen keyboards didn't cost 160 dollars and are inherently more flexible than physical.

>>56500242
The 3.5 mm audio jack was invented in 1878, anon is correct...

now I can shut people's music off with a Bluetooth jammer

>>56499504
I have a pair of wireless earbuds for $9.99. You're fucking stupid

>>56504039
And they're abject trash. Who would have thought?

>>56500023
You have the option to not buy it. Literally, Apple is trying to become the most monoployzied, proprietary product of their stuff, slowing making their own standards and overpricing the fuck out of what they made in their lab. Why get rid of a 3.5mm jack? For convenience of design? That's bullshit, now you can't borrow your friend's headphones or buy some cheap ones if your expensive ones broke and you need a substitute. Apple doesn't give you variety, just a brand that no one gives a shit about.

>>56504544
>Literally, Apple is trying to become the most monoployzied, proprietary product of their stuff, slowing making their own standards and overpricing the fuck out of what they made in their lab.
It’s true that the special pairing magic only works on Apple devices running the new OSes. But the AirPods can most certainly be used as regular old Bluetooth ear buds with an Android device or a Mac running a pre-Sierra OS or whatever. The pairing button is on the capsule, not the AirPods.

File: 1452693353697.jpg (24KB, 400x400px)

24KB, 400x400px

>>56505167
>button is on the capsule

>you literally have to keep all 3 things with you at all times to listen to music

>>56504039
And they have a band and aren't just 2 separate buds you put in your ears.

>>56499263
5 HOURS
H
O
U
R
S

M E M E
E
M
E

I T!
T
!

All this proprietary shit is making me think of another company who was on top then lost it all by trapping abusing consumers with overpriced proprietary hell.

Sony

Actual jewery

>wireless

have fun losing them

>>56499504
Lol iFags just lap it up

This is how Apple makes their money, off idiots

>>56507266
well, ishits are fashion accessories
no one seriously uses them

File: 1467504085670.png (32KB, 566x574px)

32KB, 566x574px

4.5 billions years in ms paint.

>>56504544
>proprietary product of their stuff
AirPods are Bluetooth you motherfuckign retard. it's an open standard.

>>56507258
>All this proprietary shit is making me think of another company who was on top then lost it all by trapping abusing consumers with overpriced proprietary hell.
It's not proprietary you autistic shithead. Go back to sucking RMSs dick.

How much sound leakage do those create?
Not interested in the things myself, my bluebuds have better isolation than the cheap shit samsung packages with their new phones, just curious if apple even bothered to make a quality product.

Somewhat random though, I should get the foam replacements for my jaybirds, the regular ones have begun to fall out of my ear rather easily, and while they can isolate well enough, think I want something even quieter.

>>56499263
>inb4 the S model has a headphone jack and everyone buys that too.

>>56499263
>$159.00
Are there any other headphones on the market right now that are completely wireless like the airpods or whatever they're called? I remember actually looking for some a while ago and not being able to find jack shit that wasn't expensive as hell.

I'm going to buy them for my Samsung S7 Edge

>>56507530
Uhhhhh, don't they use a lightning port...?

>>56507499
There's a few like the Samsung Iconx I guess, more expensive, lesser battery life, but I think they're in-ear so they might have better sound isolation if you care about that. Some others on amazon and such if you care to look, don't know what their quality is like.
Really it's not all that surprising, it's basically the old annoying bluetooth headsets that everyone made fun of but now two of them and slightly smaller.

>>56507540
They're wireless ya fucking idiot

>>56503375
lol

>>56507548
I guess I don't really get why people are making a big deal about the price then. Sure it's stupid and gimmicky, but it's the same price range as all the other stupid and gimmicky headphones.

>>56507585
Oh, I was kinda under the impression it had an adapter you plug into the lightning port or something.

I guess this was their design teams answer to "What if people want to charge their phone and listen to headphones at the same time?"

>>56499654
It's an old pic from years back, when Flash was still relevant. Android doesn't even like doing flash anymore. You CAN, but you have to manually install it now.

>>56507617
The adapter is for poors that still own wired headphones

>>56507640
or once your """""""5""""""" hours is up

>>56507686
Real talk, when have you actually found yourself with earbuds in for 5 hours straight without any access to a charger?

>>56507708
>Real talk
>>>/facebook/

>>56507640
Wired headphones have superior sound quality to wireless.

The funny thing is $20 wired headphones beat the $160 apple crap.

You are literally paying more for less.

>>56507603
You can get bluetooth headphones on Amazon for $20

>>56507721
That is true for literally thousands of other headphones than the apple one, and those don't even have the wireless gimmick.

If you're buying these headphones, you aren't buying them for the sake of audio quality in the first place.

>>56507708
>access to a charger
So now I have to charge my faggot meme headphones like some Android poor that's always worried about battery?

Face it, Apple is shitting itself. I can't even show off the latest iphone because it looks way too much like the last one. Disgusting t b h
Iphone is starting to smell more and more like unwashed middle class trying too hard

>>56507736
But actual wireless ones like the airpods? Not ones connected by a band at the back.

>>56499654
Sauce?

>>56500365
>the adda convertor and amp are in the phone itself which means there is more space to get quality parts.
I agree with your post for the most part except this.

You COULD dedicate a lot of space in a phone for that stuff, but it doesn't happen, EVER. Generally it's all done on a monolithic IC that is crammed in a super tiny mobo along with everything else. It can be subjected to quite a bit of noise, although with modern solid state this tends not to be that big a deal.

You will get WAY more space in headphones for this, and even in earbuds it's possible to squeeze out a bit more space since the majority of the housing is still mostly for ergonomics and batteries.

TL:DR; a DAC IC for instance is going to be about 80 mm^2 (whether wolfson or burr brown) regardless of whether you put it in your phone or in headphones, among other related parts.

But yes, having active cans still sucks since you are now shifting a whole lot of shit in there, weighing it down and draining power.

Honestly I'm way more concerned about space/weight of batteries. It sucks having heavy headphones or earphones, and manufacturers sacrificing driver size for all that extra shit is something I totally see happening.

>>56507756
>Iphone is starting to smell more and more like unwashed middle class trying too hard

Well what do you expect? They were the definition of hip 15 years ago. Twenty-somethings that showed off their first gen iPods are almost 40 now.

>>56507756
>>56507756
>Iphone is starting to smell more and more like unwashed middle class trying too hard
this
don't forget the iphone poor version (SE and C garbage)

>>56507756
>Face it, Apple is shitting itself.
You've been spending too much time in the echochamber of /g/ if you actually believe that. Apple will soar on the release of this new iPhone, especially as it's pushing for more buyers of propriety accessories compatible with the lightning port. Apple have managed to elevate the iPhone to a position of consumer worship, where having the latest iPhone is seen as a status symbol that they're above middle class.

Shit, I had a lady who was buying her groceries with foodstamps talking to her friend about how she's going to intentionally break her current iPhone so that insurance will upgrade her to a 7.

File: 1324249370767.jpg (20KB, 396x385px)

20KB, 396x385px

>>56507806
>pushing for

you're equating trying with succeeding

let me explain why that's retarded:

>>56507806
>Apple will soar on the release of this new iPhone, especially as it's pushing for more buyers of propriety accessories compatible with the lightning port. Apple have managed to elevate the iPhone to a position of consumer worship, where having the latest iPhone is seen as a status symbol that they're above middle class.

Yeah, you're clueless just taking your simple minded view and not considering actual trends in Apple's releases.
Their marketing is falling apart. If they were going strong with their fashion accessory strategy that got them where they are in the first place they would never in a thousand years release iphones with minimal physical redesign.

The key is to make the look clearly different so there are no questions about announcing your status as an iphone owner. Jobs would literally spit on current Apple for this incompetency

>>56499554
>>56507639

Man I'm glad Apple fucking forced that fucking gaping security hole off the fucking internet.

I'll be happy when that shit is gone for good.

I'll admit that it was fun for a time though, during the Newgrounds era.

File: iphone-models.jpg (40KB, 585x209px)

40KB, 585x209px

>>56507872
>they would never in a thousand years release iphones with minimal physical redesign.
lolwut

>>56499263
not far enough
shoulda sold these shits for 199.99

>>56500196
You don't think reviews would be loaded by apple in their favor?

>>56507939
I'm not talking about the fucking UI design, you clearly intelligent critically thinking being

The iphone is a fashion accessory
4 looked noticeably different from 3
5 looked noticeably different from 4

This gave an important desire to upgrade to the latest look of fashion accessory, something that is lost with the 6 and the 7 because of poorly led marketing

File: 1452087479740.jpg (18KB, 720x478px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 720x478px

>apple gets rid of headphone jack, the thing that started the whole mp3 (and therefore ipod/iphone) craze
>justifies this buy saying "oh yeah we got rid of it because its 100 years old" yet doesn't remove charging port based on the same principle
>existing headphones now obsolete by default, requires cable that plugs into your charging port, a la no charging and listening to music at the same time
>BUT OY VEY GOYIM!
>Just buy our new wireless earbuds that sound like shit, are now even easier to lose and will have the battery life of a lemon, only 160 US DOLLARS!

I use my wireless headset all the time but that's because it uses a standardized, built in charging port and isn't gonna get lost in a sofa anytime soon.

>>56507758
Just a quick search on amazon for wireless earbuds says yes, but dunno if I'd trust their quality or anything, I guess some manage to be so cheap by just duplicating a mono output to both ears, but the reviews seem to suggest they work fine otherwise.

>>56508068
>doesn't remove charging port based on the same principle
I wouldn't be surprised if they do it. Inductive charging is neat, and bluetooth capability is getting pretty widespread in computers. The average normie would probably be amazed if their phone just came with a pad they plug into their macbook/ipad that charges their phone and automatically syncs when then put it on it.

>>56500165
>at least they wont fall out as easy
All depends on individual fit. My experience with in-ears is that they fall out constantly, no matter what kind of tip I use. They sit in flush for maybe two minutes (while walking) and then it's out and the music sounds like someone sucked the air from the room. I know other people who don't experience this. Apple's earpods on the other hand sit perfectly in my ear, to the point that I hardly feel them.

Also, Apple's airpods have microphones and a case which the Samsung Icon X don't have. The airpods also don't look like cheap chink shit.

So, as much as I wouldn't want wireless earbuds, the airpods are the better product for the better price, by a long shot.

>>56501248
>especially people who work out with headphones on
Yeah people who work out will be soooo glad to see they forgot to charge fucking headphones over night and now can't listen to music during the workout. It's just another nuissance to care about with no apparent pros.

File: original.png (226KB, 480x798px) Image search: [Google]

226KB, 480x798px

>>56501548
Damn straight, faggot.

>>56499654
An abundance of high-quality Japanese pornography.

>>56499833

>Or transfer files over a network?
lol, do you use wifi on your desktop or something?

File: CrzI7w_W8AAPxPi.jpg (23KB, 473x249px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 473x249px

Just another one of Apple's mistakes that Apple-fags will defend to no end.

>>56499554
android actually killed off native support for flash too

>>56500023
>made out of shitty plastic
as opposed to? the shitty plastic apple uses
>seams
the seams are on the replaceable rubber parts the ear hook and tip


the samsung icon x also have 4gb internal memory, a heart rate monitor, and real time feedback on your exercises. they don't even need the phone to play music.

the apple air pods are literally just earpods with the cords cut and batteries jammed in.

>>56499263
Apple will never go "too far"

Appledrones will take a guillotine to the head if it's done by Apple

>>56500023
That looks a hundred times better than the toothbrush bullshit stuff Apple made

>>56509736
Adobe could well implement flash into android if they wanted to (Which they did, but abandoned). They need apple's blessing if they wanted it on iOS.

>>56503375
DEVILISH

File: 1464977705-syn-pop-1464966301-samsung-gear-iconx-1.jpg (42KB, 768x512px)

42KB, 768x512px

>>56508257
>Also, Apple's airpods have microphones and a case which the Samsung Icon X don't have. The airpods also don't look like cheap chink shit.

you're right they don't have A microphone they have TWO per earbud. also they ship with a case, read your heart rate, and have 4gb of internal memory so you can listen to music without your phone.

>the airpods are the better product for the better price

keep getting cucked by apple. i'm sure they will reward your shilling.

If the sound quality is superb compared to everything else on the market i'll take the rape.

>>56509848
> superb
Lol no, did you ever listen to wired earpods?

>>56509848
Why would making something wireless suddenly make the sound quality better?

I would expect the opposite because of interference etc. why do you think cabled internet is still superior to wifi

>>56508257
>>56509837

they also have capacitive touch controls, water resistance and accelerometers for real time feedback on exercise.

>>56509848
That seems unlikely. It looks like it has the same physical design as their standard earbuds which apparently have no sound isolation. I'm guessing the sound quality itself will be the same, good, but not high end.

>>56499263
LOL nope their retarded followers buy everything ... they can never go to far.

"New iPhone 8 now without build in mic and speaker." - Apple presenter at their release event

"Wow cool i'm going to buy 10." - retarded Apple cultist

>>56501052

> well maybe if noone cares about music quality from a phone we should have just kept the 3.5 since digital is so much better than analogue

icuck logic here lads

>>56507748

> $160
> earphones
> not for sound quality tho

excellent point

>>56499263
I'm surprised they're only at that price actually. Apple should've known by now their cultists have the courage to buy anything they shit out at any price.

File: 1471686749952.png (1MB, 1200x900px)

1MB, 1200x900px

>>56499263
>mfw that's more than my phone itself cost

>>56509813
????????? in what dimension

File: wireless earbuds.jpg (32KB, 600x450px)

32KB, 600x450px

>>56510428
Setting aside the models for this picture, just grabbed the first side by side I saw, the Apple earbuds look like someone played a practical joke on you. 'Is that a tiny dildo in your ear?'

>How do you want your headphones?
>Incredibly easy to lose
>Say no more

>>56499263
190 euro's here..

>>56500850
The headphone market will never shift to accommodate the lightning port. Ever. Period. It's a proprietary port. USB C will be the standard. Every fucking company will use this. It's a no brainer. It's the majority of the market. Eventually PC's, Androids, tablets will all convert to usb-c. Why would any company develop their headphones for the fucking proprietary lightning port. It's honestly a monumental fuckup they didn't go with usb-c. I would actually agree with them if they did...but lightning port...what a fucking kek dude

>>56510676
They've deluded themselves into thinking that people will keep going along with their daft shit forever. They're Apple, they're special, why would they need to do what everybody else is doing?

The sad thing is they'll probably still do fine.

>not just stealing them from some richfag

>>56508257
I was wearing my Apple Earbuds yesterday because my Solo2 Wireless died and I had a realization.
The only reason those little fuckers fall out of my ear is because of the wire pulling downward as a walk.

>>56510732

well enjoy the weight of the battery and all the unneeded sensors in the base of the plug... probably has more downward force than the wire

Can anyone tell me of a pair of wireless ones that doesn't look like shit and doesn't cost too much?

I'm not looking for amazing sound quality here.

Is €300 for a 2nd hand iphone 6 a good price?

>>56510689
Apple used to be good, then they got stupid, almost went bankrupt and then Microsoft bailed them out...and they stayed stupid.

>>56499263
nah, they have a fanbase, it's like AMD and Ford, they can shit in a box and the lemmings will still buy it.

>>56507894
I know HTML5 is supposed to replace it, but how's that coming along? Seems videos still play in Flash whenever I go to Youtube or some backwoods streaming site.

I'm not even that worried about the security, but Flash destroys my laptop battery.

>>56499724
HAHAHAHAHA

Holy shit this guy is HILARIOUS

>>56500023
Its well established that Samsung is stagnating. You can bet though that Applefags will use this as an excuse as if Samsung is the only android company out there.

>>56511578
Go on Amazon and search for bluetooth headphones, literally $20 for a pair.

>>56499422
How about making a better quality but smaller headphone jack and refining the standard instead of removing it alltogether.

if faggots everywhere wouldn't constantly talk about muh mac and muh iphone I wouldn't even know what steve jobs and apple is

>apple releases cyclical hardware update

"wahhh, apple doesn't innovate anymore"

>apple releases something new

"wahhh, apple released something new and it's too costly and inconvenient to use"

your grapes will always taste sour

won't be buying any of this shit, but some of you guys are just haters.

>>56514271

>Apple releases something bad
"waaah it sucks"

>>56514271
>Calling out a company for making bad overpriced products is sour grapes

Yeah ok.

The funny thing is that people will actually believe Apple invented wireless earphones. Absolutely disgusting.

File: 1463518741947.jpg (111KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 1080x1080px

If you guys wanna see how fucking delusional Appletards are, check out this post by John Gruber... who's THE BIGGEST Apple shill in the world. He's supposedly an independent blogger but he's extremely close to Apple's executives and quite often he has them on his talk show.

http://daringfireball.net/2016/09/iphone_7_jet_black_vs_black

But the best funniest is that he ABSOLUTELY HATES COMMENTS on blogs and has them disabled on his site but you can actually install a 3-rd party extension and comment/read what his readers are saying.

So, install this plugin:

https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/daring-fireball-with-comm/cpkbpmniionhpjhgicbmknjngmldlijg

And go read the comments. It's fucking HILARIOUS! All the comments are anonymous too. Clearly some 4chan ppl post there because I see a lot of 4chan memes.

>>56514660

that's literally what it is

you're trying to grapeception your grapes by justifying them

>>56499263
apple sheep will still support them so no. the only people who have the power to stop apple from being jews are same people that eat their shit up

>>56499263

>Have Apple gone too far this time?

Absolutely, but they been going too far for years now selling girly looking fagshit with less features for more money along with a contract that says "their way or the highway" that you automatically sign up for upon purchase. It's Apple M8. They are the king threshold of going too far.

But even worse than the product is all the Applefags that rant and rave about the shit. Hate Applefags.

>>56501248
>I'll take a larger battery over ancient tech

"Ancient" tech that is still the primary source of the purpose served, with no alternative other than this forced obsoletion Apple keeps pushing. I'm glad I use headphones professionally so I work more with my native 1/4" than I do an 1/8" adapter.

With all the bullshit that has happened, I only hope this won't trigger the race of cramming shitty gimmicks and sensors into wireless earbuds/IEMs with low quality drivers and sell it for premium just because a standard earpod that has extra sensors now cost $160.

File: no.jpg (3MB, 2800x1946px)

3MB, 2800x1946px

Tfw your cousin pre-ordered an iphone 7 PLUS

>>56500023
> are superior IEMs not retarded earbuds
> can easily attach a cord so as not to lose them in some situations
> do not look like a toothbrush

apple = rekt

>>56499422
why didnt i think of this bait

>>56499263
I have a £150 set of Jabra wireless earphones that are well worth the money. Wireless is literally the future, and while I have no Apple device, the pause/play ear mechanic, and 24hr charging station makes the cost of these miniscule in comparison

>>56499263

Aplel drones will still buy it.

File: 64579.jpg (83KB, 600x599px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 600x599px

Why didn't they put two lightning ports?
one for the headphone one for the charger

>>56516593

It's called courage, goy. Now buy our products.

File: 1454893545705.jpg (49KB, 394x389px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 394x389px

>>56516593
>two

That's too confusing for an Apple user.

File: courage.jpg (26KB, 738x482px)

26KB, 738x482px

>>56516593
Courage!

File: samsung-iconx.jpg (63KB, 770x433px)

63KB, 770x433px

>>56499422

>Apple did it first guize!!1

>>56499422
i love this pasta

>>56499504
If they are at all like ipod headphones I have used before they are horribly uncomfortable, with bad quality sound

>>56513245
Most YouTube videos are already available in HTML5, you just have to enable it on some computers

File: applel.jpg (87KB, 509x414px)

87KB, 509x414px

>>56516593
something like this would of been a simple solution
fucking hell apple is really starting to lose it

Where do these apple shills come from every time they release something.

It's simple, really. Innovation is cool, but unless its superior than the prior solution it isn't going to take off. A wire isn't that inconvenient, not enough to justify paying $150 to lose the wire. And that would also I imply that the lack of wire is so much better that is negates the downsides like short battery life and poor sound quality. But it doesn't, most people would rather just spend less on wired headphones.

Apple relies on their legions of retards who hype their shit for no reason at all.

>>56509782
how do you fit 4gb memory in that form factor

>the state of iphone users

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxXbrnJ6l4A

File: 1473390250517.jpg (387KB, 798x1000px) Image search: [Google]

387KB, 798x1000px

>>56499422
He's actually right, you know.

>>56517185
But will iphone sales drop because of no headphone jack ? Im guessing no, apple knows people will keep paying for the IOS ecosystem and put up with the hassle of the adapter cable or pay for wireless. They are leveraging the sucess of the iphone , to screw thier customers.

>>56501772
Tits or gtfo

File: 1460762260587.png (570KB, 1250x640px)

570KB, 1250x640px

>>56517630
What he meant.

>>56516849
apple earbuds are the only ones that fit my ears :^(

>>56500023
but those stick in your ear and monitor your heart rate

>>56511534

>microphone
>antenna
>battery
>>>>unneeded sensors in the base of the plug
>tiny battery inside AirPod having more weight than a 1.4M wire

Get out you autistic retard. I can almost taste your tears.

>>56517859

can you also taste the $160 I still have?

>>56500850
No we won't. The rest of the world will not start using apples proprietary audio port. Sure you may get some made special for Apple products but everyone else either picks up a new standard or sticks with 3.5mm headphone ports

>>56508152
I don't trust the apple ones quality

>>56517859
They're unneeded weight once they run out of charge in 4 hours though

>>56507708
every day, when I'm working in the laboratory listening to music to stave off boredom while I'm at the bench. I'm talking 8+ hour stretches where I don't want to have my music interrupted.

dualshock 2 <<< dualshock 3 / 4
why don't you want to move on?

>>56518312

You're not wrong
Dualshock 3 has awful triggers and dualshock 4 has awful battery life and a bunch of useless changes that only make it less comfortable

>>56499422
flavorful. but still needs some seasoning to the B8.

>>56517962

I can taste your poverty.

>>56518265

This is going in my screencaps folder, absolutely delicious. All batteries run out of charge you handicap.

>>56499263
Name some wireless earbuds that as good or better for less money and I'll buy them.

>>56499844
I hope people realize that not actually a pencil right?

Not far enough.

>>56514732
Is that cum in her glass=?

File: 1463306019316.jpg (47KB, 327x303px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 327x303px

lol they don't even have enough sense in them to build these like spheres that would look kinda cool. That P-shaped abomination, oh my God. Having that crap hanging out of your ear will make you look so much dumber than a cable ever could. I should have known. Steve would've fired those idiots with a flamethrower.

File: squirrel thinker.jpg (56KB, 264x292px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 264x292px

>>56516593
How would you know which is which?

>>56518717
*his
and yes

File: Buckle Up.gif (579KB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

579KB, 480x270px

The new iPhone and AirPods are stunning and brave. Stunning. They are absolutely beautiful and an inspiration. Apple is an amazing, beautiful company who had the exquisite bravery of a butterfly flying against the wind.

File: star-trek-uhura.jpg (13KB, 292x356px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 292x356px

>>56518732

once again star trek predicts the future.

>>56514732
this picture raises many questions