Why do iPhone normie's even try to defend their inferior

>>56493769
says the guy who says eyes only see 30fps and we don't need 60fps in games.

if 1440p is fine on a 25 inch screen, why do you want 4k on a fucking phone?

>>56493769
>The human eye doesn't see in resolution, the higher the resolution on a phone the sharper things will be, even if it's noticed subconsciously.
Do you even know how eyes work?

>>56493769
>The human eye doesn't see in resolution
It doe sin a sense: http://www.clarkvision.com/articles/eye-resolution.html

muh 1440×2560 on 5.7" is perfect. can't see pixels even if I try. iphone has dogshit res but at least it saves some battery.

>>56493849
Where did op say that?

>>56493907
The pixel density of a 1440p screen on a 5.5 inch screen would be less than 800x480, closer to 480x320. That's worse than the resolution of the original droid, is that fine for you?

>>56494174
I'm sorry, what?

>>56494207
Not him, but nice reading comprehension m8.

>>56493769
Ever wonder why flagship Android phones still get frame drops?

>>56494257
cuck

>>56494174
1440p on 5.5 inch is about 500 ppi
854 × 480 on 3.7 inch is about 265 ppi

>>56494742
I think what he means is that the pixel density of a 25 inch screen with a resolution of 1440p would be the same as a 5.5 inch screen with a resolution of 480x320.

>>56493933
None of these people do.

>>56495202
I don't sit 10 inches away from my monitor.

>>56495202
>I think what he means is that the pixel density of a 25 inch screen with a resolution of 1440p would be the same as a 5.5 inch screen with a resolution of 480x320.
So what?

>>56495260
>>56495271
Just explaining.

Also, it was the answer to this post: >>56493907

"Retina HD"

How can you even defend those meme buzzwords?

>>56495328
How can you defend ridiculous pixel density at the expense of everything a phone needs to be?

>>56495328
Only turbo autists care about how things are called.