>next upcoming amd product will beat nvidia/intel!!!!!

>>56463508
I honestly thought they were paid shills for a while but I think they're just clueless optimists.

Market dominance tends to produce economies of scale that result in superior software/hardware. I have no real allegiance to or love for Intel or nVidia but I can't fault their products on a technical level.

>>56463562
They are dumb technology hipsters like 90% of g, nothing more

The best part of that image is that "cores" is the label of both axes.

>>56463562
Hi, noob here. Been lurking on /g/ to try and learn. So I should just ignore these new AMDs and buy an i3 6100? I'm on a budget.

>>56464311
Yes

>>56464338
Thanks for your help. :)

It's a sad, pathetic cycle. But /g/ is where all these Tech hipsters and their retarded memes live

Linuxfags, AMDfags, all types of basement dwelling autists.

>>56464311
It doesn't really matter either way. But it's been my experience that AMD card users end up coming here for help far more than vice versa.

>>56464451
Thats because AMD has absolutely god awful build quality and drivers.
It's no wonder their products are "Cheap", they have a failure rate 10x that of Nvidia's

>>56463508
> 9geg

Hi 9gag

>My Nvidia card is the best!

Nvidia then proceeds to gimp your gpu after only a year to make way for the next card, which you unwisely spend your hard earned shekels on.

>My Nvidia card is the best!

Repeat until homeless
It happened with Kepler, its happening right now with Maxwell not supporting DX12/Vulkan, its gonna happen to Pascal