>1440p smartphone >1080p desktop >720p laptop Why is

>2160p TV
>1440p desktop
>1440 smartphone

I'm not even a rich fag, you can find cheap 4k TVs with relatively low input lag this time a year as they clear their stock to make way for the 2017 models. I have a cheap Acer G257HU that was 250 bucks and my S7 I guess I kinda splurged on release but I didn't out right buy it.

supply and demand

>no "smart"phone
>1080p laptop
The patrician's choice.

File: kill_myself._.png (831KB, 1280x1381px) Image search: [Google]

831KB, 1280x1381px

>4k tv
>4k desktop
>1080p phone
I feel for the 4k meme

>3200x1800 laptop
>854x480 phone

>New phone has better resolution than my desktop monitor

>>56459852
me on the right

>>56459908
this
The shitty 768p laptops are the poorfag ones
Most decent laptops these days have over 1080p, and gaming desktops is usually 1080/1440p

>>56459852
What
> bullshit
?

>>56460571
Ausfag here, you'd be hard pressed to find a laptop with a higher resolution than 1366x768 here for less than 1.2k

>>56459852
Gas these fucking whores.

>>56459852
The larger you make a screen, the more expensive it is to manufacture it. The higher the DPI, the more expensive it is to manufacture it.

People can justify spending $300 on a phone display, and they can justify spending $300 on a desktop display, but they can't justify spending $1000 on a desktop display.

It's as simple as that

>1080p phone
>1080p laptop
>1080p monitor (2x)
Feelsgoodman

>1080p desktop
>720p laptop

Are you posting from 2008?

>>56460571

dude, there's no denying that there's an overabundance of 768p laptops, it's been the de facto standard for years. Really annoying to wade through so many laptops to find a decent res.

>>56459852

>1600p Laptop
>1080p Desktop
>750p smartphone

File: 131030_macbookpro_15_01-660x440.jpg (62KB, 660x440px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 660x440px

>>56460697
You should stop buying shitty laptops.

>>56460716
Thanks for posting an example of a shitty laptop to avoid

>>56459852
>3440x1440 desktop
>just ordered a 3840x2160 laptop
>1920x1080 smartphone

I regret nothing.

>>56460740
seconded

>>56460612
That's because you're an Ausfag. Your silly currency and tech prices are meaningless to everyone else.

>>56459852
1440p phone
1700p laptop
2160p desktop

don't blame me for being poor

>4096x2160 for my 32" desktop display
>960x540 for my 4.5" phone
Working out fine for me

The phone is higher DPI but I also view it up closer so it works out

>4k smartphone
>1080p desktop and laptop
I feel it, OP. My desktop would be 4K if I didn't pley geimus or felt like spending a gorillian dollars on a GPU every time Nvidia decides to gimp their older lineup. 1080p laptop because
>DUDE
>22 HOUR BATTERY LIFE
>LMFAO

>>56459852
>1080p TV
>1080p Desktop
>900p Laptop
>1440p Phone

Netflix is better on my super amoled phone screen than any of my other devices. The only downside, 5.7 inch screen.

>>56459970
POOORFAG GET OUT BITCH

>>56460879
>nvidia gimp old lineup
I wish this meme would die, you literally can't prove that there's any active gimping happening

File: lous rossman manlet.png (272KB, 601x1016px) Image search: [Google]

272KB, 601x1016px

2004 = we 1024p nao!
2016 = we 1080p nao!

Monitors are such a fucking scam.

>>56459852
>720p laptops

There are also shit phones and tvs. But there are also laptops/desktops with 4k screens. Try not showing how poor you are next time.

>phone is LG G4 at 1440p

>Desktop has 30" UltraSharp 1600p

>Laptop is a 3200x1800 HP envy 15t I got used on Craigslist for a steal.

Actually manufacturers seem to finally be moving to 1080p as the default res for everything but the super budget machines, finally after over a decade. I remember back in like 2002 picking up a budget Compaq with a 1440x900 panel

>1080p TV
>1080p Desktop
>1080p Smartphone
>720p Laptop
How much is it to get a 1080p laptop these days anyways?

File: are you feeling it now mr krabs.jpg (44KB, 540x524px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 540x524px

>4k smartphone
>1440p desktop
>768p laptop
>240p New 3DS XL

>>56461028
Like 500 dollars?

>>56459944
if that laptop is not under 13" you might as well kill yourself and tip your fedora after you do it

>>56459852
>720p smartphone
>720p desktop
>720p laptop

Livin' the dream.

>>56460811
>>just ordered a 3840x2160 laptop
why

>>56460692
I'm not paying $300 extra for the touch 4k screen in a laptop.

If they didn't force touch shit I would 4k.

>>56460668
Same boat here. Both my monitors are 1080p 16:10 though which are rare unless you splurge more and more goybucks.

I've actually sort of stopped caring about Smartphones. There isn't anything major they could do likely in the near future that would wow me so why spend the extra scratch since cheap phones are so friggin good right now. I'd rather nab a a nice flip phone with a 13Mp or better shooter on it. I could just tether my old smartphone to my car's internet if necessary.

File: ffaa5f47-32dc-46b8-8f00-54ebb2c4cfd9_1.f74f3ae64f14c91f313680ed7ede6696.jpg (94KB, 1500x1500px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 1500x1500px

>>56460716
>tfw this is a really good all-purpose laptop if you can deal with the hideous looks

>>56461240
I might be broken as an individual but I find the Latitude series more seksi.

>>56459852
>flagship smartphone
>mid ranged desktop
>low end laptop
why is this allowed?

3840p desktop monitor
1800p laptop
1440p smartphone

you’re doing it wrong OP

>>56459852
>720p phone
>900p laptop
>1080p (triple monitor) desktop

Laptop could be 1080p and desktop 1440p but aside from that im pretty happy.

>>56461361
You can buy cheap smartphones with 1440p screens though, and anything above 1080p is enthusiast, not midrange, for a desktop

>>56461044
Fucking Nintendo

>>56461044
>240p dsl
Dude, that's psp tier resolution

>>56461497
PSP has better resolution than the 3ds

>>56461106
because that anon doesn't want to see individual pixels.

Too many people miss the point of high PPI with scaling.
With a high PPI no matter how much you scale things will continue to look crisp and sharp since the pixels themselves are remaining constant size.

>>56459852
>1440p desktop
>1440p phone
>1080p tv

Nothing really broadcasts in 1440, and the only thing in 4k is sportsball. Feels good being this comfy.

>>56461869
still, 4k on a 15" ?

>>56459852
Get a Korean 1440p monitor for less than $200 on ebay, I got a couple Qnix QX2710 and OCed them to 100hz.

>1440p phone
>1440p monitor
>766p laptop

>>56459852
Idk, but that's exactly what I have

>>56460668
It shouldn't feel good. You have NO idea how shitty 1080 looks until you get a 4k monitor. Remember 1080 was a half measure; 1440 is true HD. 4k is near perfection and 8k will be beyond your ability to discern an individual pixel.

1080 is ancient.

>4K TV
>5K desktop
>2560 x 1600 laptop
>1080p phone

>>56462482
>4k is near perfection and 8k will be beyond your ability to discern an individual pixel.
You know that 4K vs 8K is primarily about the wider viewing angle, right?

The actual resolution is the same. Btw, same is true for 1080p vs 4K

>>56459852
1080p TV's, laptop and phone. I fail to see the problem...

>>56459852
>480 x 800 smartphone
>1920 x 1080 desktop
>1280 x 800 laptop
Cum @ me.

>>56462988
But I wanna suck your cum out with my mouth bic boi.

>>56461028
I'm currently shitposting on a Toshiba Chromebook 2015 with a 1080p screen that I got for $300.

>>56461408
any decent chinkphone with 1440p is probably $350+ if it's not too gimped or deprecated in other regards, you should be able to get a decent desktop monitor for that price or less

>>56462620
no it's not, higher resolution content doesn't have a wider field of view and most people sit a fair distance away from the screen especially when watching moview

File: 1473089147455.jpg (8KB, 222x216px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 222x216px

>720p phone
>900p laptop

Meh

>>56460692
LeL.

>>56459852
>2160p desktop
>1800p laptop
>1440p phone
Try not being poor

If you paid the same price you paid for your smart phone on a desktop or laptop, you too could have 1440p.

>>56463484
https://m.aliexpress.com/item/32693564510.html
Not even $200, lol.

>>56463657
>snapdragon 810
lol

and letv is a literally who brand probably with garbage software support

>>56462482
1440p/4K/8K/9001K/WTFk
None of it matters unless you have content to view at those resolutions. Gaming is ok to argue QHD/4K but until the motion picture companies are moved to being 4K as the standard and not the exception [*stares at BD content*] it's a luxury res. [unless you are some multitasking maniac with a super wide setup for multiple documents being open at the same time. You are excused].

>>56463681
They're bigger than Xiaomi, and have already have updated all their phones from lollipop to marshmallow few months before Xiaomi released miui8.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/LeEco

>>56459852

>Why is this bullshit allowed?
Normies.

>>56459852
>1600p laptop.
>3x 1080p desktop.
>1080p phone.
>1080p TV.


What should I do?

>>56463748
>1440p/4K/8K/9001K/WTFk
>None of it matters unless you have content to view at those resolutions.
t. someone who has never had to read text on any of his screens

>>56463681
>literally who brand
>garbage software support
Are you retarded?

File: sadjsfdsag.jpg (92KB, 958x1300px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 958x1300px

You literally don't need a smartphone resolution higher than 1080p. Not unless you are a bird with super resolution eyesight, or your smartphone is 10 inches or something.

>1440p smartphone
Marketing garbage to idiots.
>1080p desktop
Common fucking sense
>720p laptop
Because laptop screens are smaller and 1080p would be a waste (i.e. laptop makers aren't trying to sell to complete fucking morons like smartphones are).

>1080p TV
>1080p Monitor
>1080p Phone
>900p Laptop

How poor am I /g/?

>>56463504
>being this uninformed about how TV standards work
I forgot this was neo-/g/

>>56462091
I got one too. High input lag but worth it.

>>56463941
ok show us a 4k movie screenshot vs 1080p, teach us master

>>56459906
How are the colors for such cheap displays?

>>56459970
S4 mini or J1?

>>56462296
You can overclock monitors??

>>56463869
>Because laptop screens are smaller and 1080p would be a waste (i.e. laptop makers aren't trying to sell to complete fucking morons like smartphones are).


But that's wrong you fucking retard.

>>56459906
>Cheap UHD TVs
Good luck enjoying your 4:2:0/4:2:2 you fucking pleb.

File: images.jpg (15KB, 470x313px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 470x313px

>>56459852
Bitch I have a 4K smartphone what now?

>>56464039
how's app support? don't most apps run in 1080p or some bullshit like that?

File: 2dd.jpg (15KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 300x300px

>>56461385
>3840p desktop monitor

>>56459944
>no smart phone
>1366x768 laptop
>1920x1080 desktop
are home phones a botnet or its ok because you don't carry them with you?

>>56464693
still a botnet, each landline is associated to a person and communication easily tracked

>1080p smartphone
>1080p desktop
>1080p tv
1080p mustard rice

>>56459852
1440p phone
1440p+1080p desktop
1080p laptop

????

>>56459852
The MacBook with Retina display does not have this problem

>1080p x2 desktop
>1080p phone
>1080p TV
>1080p laptop

TEN ATEY PEE EVERYTHING

i have

>1440p desktop
>900p laptop
>720p phone

am i doing it right?

>2016
>Owning a desktop

>>>/v/

>>56460827
Damn... I'm not even going to argue with that. :(

I want to leave this place

1080 monitor
1080 monitor
1440 phone

no laptop

not a big deal since my monitors are at 144hz, phone can't push that

4k monitor
1440p phone

I personally own no lower resolution devices

>>56463192
>Toshiba Chromebook 2015

What distro you running on it? Ubuntu?

File: 1464961912350.gif (1MB, 260x260px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 260x260px

>>56459852
my laptops;
1994: 640x480
1997: 1024x768
2004: 1400x1050
2008: 1280x800

DPI scaling.
only phone OS's, which were made with it in mind from the beginning, have functional and uniform scaling
without it, high dpi (that is, anything considerably more than ~120dpi) makes elements too small, so until desktop OS's can sort out dpi scaling, we're stuck with low dpi screens

>>56459852
The S8 is supposedly going to be 4k

>>56460618
It's funny when a picture of a couple of girls triggers you neckbeard virgins

>>56461240
can confirm. it's basically a mobile workstation with a consumer (gaymer) gpu. got the gtx980m model. it can do anything.

Fact: 1366x768 is cancer.
They just tricked people into thinking it was any good by calling it "HD".

>>56466668
> t. never use mac os x

>>56459852
>3440x1440 desktop
>2560x1600 laptop
>640x1136 phone

Fell for all the memes in recent months

File: Screen Shot 2016-09-07 at 15.47.10.png (250KB, 1396x1074px) Image search: [Google]

250KB, 1396x1074px

>1440p smartphone
>1800p laptop
>2880p desktop
Step it up fàm

>2* 1920x1200 Desktop
>1920x1080 Laptop
>1440x900 Laptop with 100% libre software running Tails
>1280x720 Moto /g/ phone
Feels comfy.

Is there a worse resoultion than 1366x768? I fucking hate that shit.

>>56461869
Wouldn't 1440p be enough ?
I get the point of having 4K on 21"+ monitor, but not on 15"...

1080x1920 phone
1920x1080 desktop
2880x1800 laptop

>1080 desktop and smartphone

sweet spot for both imo senpai desu

>>56468405
>mac

sage hide, opinion discarded, called the cops and 360'd out of the applestore

File: 1473255748332.png (265KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 480x480px

>>56468405
The integrated graphics will cause your house to burn down driving that display. Guarantee it

>40" 1080p TV
I'll upgrade to a 4K in the next years, maybe to a bigger one, 43" maybe.
>21,5" 1080p dektop
Will upgrade next summer to a 1440p 25~27".
>5,5" 1080p phone.
Just perfect.
>no laptop
If I get any in the future I'd like to get a 768p or 900p one, anything higher would be inecessary for me since I'd just work sometimes on it.


The only excuses to have other resolutions is because you are a richfag or you really play on your phone/laptop/TV. for some stupid reason.

>>56468693
It's a radeon M, no real housefire danger, it's just very shit and can't even handle basic OS animations at that resolution.

>>56459852
more like
>768p laptop

>4k phone
>1080p Monitor
>2x 1080p laptops
I'm fine with what I have

1440p smartphone
1080p 14" laptop

feels good desu

>>56459908
>>56460571
>muh supply and demand
how do they know if there is demand, if they are selling the shit for too much in the first place?
it's clear that laptops and PCs in general give them higher profits, and >>56461129

>2560x1440 smartphone
>2560x1600 tablet
>3840x2160 laptop
>6000x1440 desktop

You're doing something wrong OP

>>56468949
Windows user spotted

File: chloe miele.jpg (98KB, 634x859px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 634x859px

>>56460952
Is this louis' waifu?

>>56459852
>1080p tv
>1080p monitor
>720p smartphone
Feels good being a poorfag.

>854x480 phone
>1280x800 windows tablet
>1024x758 ebook reader
>1600x1200 and 1680x1050 laptops
>1280x1024+1920x1200+1280x1024 desktop

>>56461497
psp is 480x272

>1440p phone
>1600p tablet
>1440p laptop
>1080p desktop

huh?

>>56462296
>wanting stuck pixels, horrible backlight bleed and IPS glow this hard

>use ancient analog TV
>everything switches to 16:9 broadcasts, letterboxed all the time
>now finally buy 16:9 HDTV
>every channel starts broadcasting 21:9
Why is this allowed

>>56468405
Now you can see grandmas Facebook photos of cookies in 1080p!
woooo

What's the point of having a 4K TV in 2016? No one broadcasts in 4K and gaming consoles probably won't be able to do that for another decade

File: 1446849794667.png (56KB, 188x188px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 188x188px

>>56469562
>consoles

>>56469869

Right, that's my point. >consoles and television aren't in 4K, so why spend the money on that kind of TV?

>>56469933
>using consoles
>watching tv

>1080p desktop, laptop, phone, tv

>>56459852

Fucking asshole with the small laptop meme.

Why the fuck cant I have a bigger screen. I need to look at a text terminal a sql terminal and a fucking document at once this shit doesnt fit on this little screen fuck the 12 hour battery life.

>>56465515
It's Australians getting fucked like you that make tech prices in Canada feel tolerable :)

>>56469562

I only watch shit I download these days. Netflix will be there as soon as my internet provider is as well. Gigabit is being rolled out around me in the Chicago suburbs.

Dont have a 4k yet but I can see why.

>>56470006

So really the only reason to have a 4K TV is if you have a PC with a ridiculous video card and want to play from your couch/bed or something?

>>56464001
Neither has the resolution that I've given.

>>56470091

You can watch 4k content with a so so pc. Have to download instead of stream but there you go.

>>56465438
Dell XPS 13 with InfinityEdge display does not have this problem either.

>>56470127

I was talking more about games but fair enough... How hard is it to find content in such a high resoution? Is it becoming more common?

>>56470167

Depends on how willing you are to pirate. If so then yes common as fuck. All new shit coming out ends up with a 4k version. Also I tend not to watch much else so for me thats fine.

Once again content companies shoot themselves in the foot by making legal copies harder to get. Still a thing however. I wonder if netflix will rent you 4k dvds/brays. I havent checked and I stopped that sub years ago.

Also Netflix is just waiting for isps to step up so they can do 4k streams.

>>56470167

Also the game thing is much more in range now. Just get a solid new nvidia card. These tvs are only 60 fps so its not that hard to reach.

File: 8ae0cdccd837e72333ebb7efb8579d7e_XL.jpg (339KB, 750x563px) Image search: [Google]

339KB, 750x563px

>>56470127
There do exist a few people that do 4K steaming on jewtube
Not everyone is incompetent like Linus

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ak2xqH5h0YY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bA5D6KqA8w8

>>56470167
4K is the next standard.
While it is not everywhere, it is only a matter of time.
new movies are being released in 4K
more content is showing up as 4K in youtube
netflix is expanding its 4K offering
I see 4K being pushed more and more by the cable company

>>56470228
>Depends on how willing you are to pirate. If so then yes common as fuck. All new shit coming out ends up with a 4k version. Also I tend not to watch much else so for me thats fine.
Most of the shit I am finding to pirate are horrible upscales
You can't just fucking upscale 4x the resolution, it looks like ass

>>56470243
>Just get a solid new nvidia card.
yeah maybe a 1070 or 1080 and how many people have those ?
4K crushes video cards.
I can't remember the settings I used for DX:MD but at 4K i was getting 13fps with my 970
if I am to turn down the settings to get better FPS i might as well just play at 1080 with good settings and scale it up
scaling 1080 to 4K doesn't give you any artifacts since the scaling is a perfect 200%

>>56459852
>1080p smartphone
>3 768p laptops

File: 1457255488185.png (810KB, 2000x2241px) Image search: [Google]

810KB, 2000x2241px

>4.5" 720p phone
>40" 4k monitor
>broke the bank last month with 4k projector at 120 inches
>projector remote has 'ANIME' button
>no laptop
feels good

>>56461202
>1080p 16:10
Think you mean 1200p you dolt

>>56470300
>more content is showing up as 4K in youtube
most of which are either gaymer trash or simple 2d animations for podcast type talk videos which dont benefit from 4k and just waste bandwith.
>netflix is expanding its 4K offering
nope
>new movies are being released in 4K
and cinemas can play them 4k, no one buys movies anymore
>I see 4K being pushed more and more by the cable company
as an excuse to increase fares

>>56470470
>>40" 4k monitor
enjoy having the same PPI as a 20" 1080p monitor

>>56459852
my 1440p smartphone used to be the highest resolution display in my entire house, then I got a 4k monitor. My Kobo also has a 300ppi screen, but the phone is llike fucking 565ppi

>>56470496
>and cinemas can play them 4k, no one buys movies anymore
you are retarded

>>56470499
That's what I like about it. It's like having 4 20" 1080p panels with no borders. Coming from 3 1080p panels it feels so good

>>56470496
it doesn't matter if the 4k content coming out is to your liking or not, my statement still stands 4K is becoming more popular.

>>56460067
Proof.

>>56459908
What this anon said, but with the caveat that the smartphone market is distorted by carrier subsidies. People aren't willing to spend a lot of money on a decent monitor or a laptop with a high definition display. They wouldn't be willing to spend $800 on a smartphone either, but the cost is hidden via contract agreements, so they only see "Free with a two year contract!"

>>56459944
>not having a 16:10 laptop

>>56460811
>>56463957
Let me guess, XPS 15? It's a gorgeous screen, but the response time is agony.

>2160p desktop
>2160p TV
>1800p laptop

Step it up poorfags

File: happepe.jpg (70KB, 400x388px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 400x388px

I love 1366x768, it's a weird looking number but it has just the right amount of screen space to be comfy and productive.

>>56470650
>1800p laptop
enjoy your garbage battery life
anything higher than 1440p is just asking to waste precious energy on it
phones have an excuse because the cpu itself barely uses energy and at least my screen is an oled displaying mostly black pixels at any given time

>>56470673
Its a work laptop anyway so its plugged in most of the time

>>56470383
>yeah maybe a 1070 or 1080 and how many people have those ?
fuck you it's like $400 for an amazing graphics card and you can get 1060 for like $200 and 1050 will be even cheaper, you're spending $1k+ on a good tv anyway

>>56459852
>2016
>still no 144hz phones
Why do we allow this?

>>56470666
what

>>56471636
You idiot, you missed the point.

OP was saying that you need a "solid nvidia card" for 4K
Seeing how the 1060 is not marketed for 4K and most reviewers don't bother benchmarking higher than 1440p with the card its not a 4K card.
If you want 4K its either a 1070 or 1080.

>>56459852
4k TV
4k Desktop
4k Smartphone
1080p Ultrabook
im ok with that

>>56470383
>4k crushes video cards
dude, my 290x can play pretty much anything made before 2013 at 4k at 60fps if not damn close to it
it can even play crysis warhead at 60fps on high settings

>1080p for all 3
Fuck memes

>>56459944
The neets choice

>>56470608
Close. Precision M5510. It's based on the XPS 15 but different internals.

>>56478592
>it can even play crysis warhead at 60fps on high settings
You're so full of fucking shit.

I got a 4k notebook a few months ago and the other day I went to sit at my old dusty 1080p desktop that I only use remotely now and holy fuck is 1080p at 26 inches absolutely disgusting

1024 x 768 desktop
whatever resolution my crappy netbook has

Normies wanna brag about their phones.

>>56463930
900p laptop... macbook air?

>>56479559
You can actually get nearly the same specs as a Precision for several hundred cheaper with Alienware if you're willing to suck up with the gaymer looks. Mostly because of the premium on Quadro cards. They recently released an OLED 13' too if you're rich

>>56459852
>8core smartphone
>6core pc
>4core laptop

>>56459944
>NEET starter kit