Why aren't you using best linux distro? Even Torvalds

One thing I don't understand is why the version of Anaconda in CentOS allows you to install a bunch of different groups while you absolutely need to download spins for Fedora.

I am using the best Linux distro. I'm not using Fedora.

>>56436763
I believe in God

relax OP, I am using it.

>>56436763
Because Manjaro exists

>>56436763
It may be better than Arch but both are shit.

>>56436763
I am though
>>56436825
kek

File: AkUHoEM.jpg (68KB, 1000x769px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 1000x769px

>>56436763
Fuck off sysmemed shill.
Gentoo the only thing.
Install gentoo.

File: Screenshot from 2016-09-03 08-33-00.png (428KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

428KB, 1366x768px

>Normal Consumer Tier:

Fedora with gnome is the best if you don't mind doing minimal configuration (fonts, rpmfusion, codecs).

Ubuntu with Unity is second best if you prefer unity over gnome. No extra setup required and I might actually switch to ubuntu once unity 8 comes out.

OpenSUSE is pretty good too.

Now keep in mind all these top three have partnerships with Microsoft and you should email the maintainers and tell them that that's bad.

>Autismo tier

Arch if you're too dumb to install gentoo

Gentoo for real men

>wannabe hacker tier

kali
Manjaro
CentOS on desktop

>muh stability

Debian Stable

>>56437012
I can tell you've never tried to install a Gentoo.

>>56436763
It requires systemdicks.

File: cinnamon.png (1MB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1200px

>>56436763
>Why aren't you using best linux distro?
I am

>>56437053
If you actually use linux post a pic of your desktop.

I'm guessing you're a paid microsoft shill.

File: 3.png (63KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 625x626px

>>56437014
>Ubuntu with Unity is second best

File: Screenshot from 2016-09-05 13-57-36.png (82KB, 922x462px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 922x462px

>>56437014
> Epic tier
Void

>>56437014
>Manjaro
>hacker tier
For a second there I thought the post was serious

>>56437014
Arch is the new crunch bang.

File: Screenshot from 2016-09-05 14-00-07.png (154KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 1366x768px

>>56437074
Take it. And?

>>56437074
Actually, I was wrong. Fedora doesn't require systemd, it just enables it by default.

>>56437087
the fuck is void linux

>>56437130
It's what linux was supposed to be.

>>56437128
So now prove you aren't using systemd

>>56436763
The names pretty embarrassing

>>56437014
>wannabe hacker tier
>Not Pentoo
>Not black arch 1337 haxxor mode.
At least ou got Kali right.

>>56437110
Why?

File: Screenshot from 2016-09-05 14-05-18.png (77KB, 802x462px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 802x462px

>>56437146
Easy man.

>>56437130
Arch Linux without Systemd

File: Screenshot from 2016-08-31 14-23-02.png (246KB, 587x402px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 587x402px

>>56437185
Okay, so now withoutbeing autistic can you explain coherently why void is better than fedora and don't just say "HURR DURR IT'S """TRUE""" LINUX!!!11"

>>56437213
it's not

File: screenFetch-2016-09-05_07-14-27.png (329KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

329KB, 1920x1080px

>>56437213
it doesnt really get much more pure than fedora with out going into all that stallmanism bullshit.
>>56437061
LOL

>>56437014
>Fedora with gnome is the best if you don't mind doing minimal configuration (fonts, rpmfusion, codecs).
and screen tearing

i don't understand how to install programs
and set programs to start on startup

i just use add-apt-repository, apt-get update, install commands on xubuntu and add the program to the startup program on xubuntu and it works.

anything else is a pile of crap for me and the coders take it for granted that you are a hacker.

>>56437213
0. No bloat.
1. Transparent build system: https://build.voidlinux.eu
2. Comunity-driven repository of package build scripts instead of unclear rpm system.
3. Rolling-release cycle (also the only acceptable).
4. Godlike binary package manager with option to build package from source with custom flags (as in gentoo) if you want.
Satisfied?

>>56437348
You're working under the assumption that any of that means anything.

>>56437317
I don't get screen tearing with video in x11, but I do when I resize the terminal.

Wayland is smooth as butter, so I just use it (fedora ships with wayland preview).

>>56437348
>>56437370
>when you try to make someone to look like they're trolling but they give you an actual answer

File: sad-frog-meme-butt.jpg (23KB, 450x500px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 450x500px

>>56437348
>0. No bloat.
meaningless
>1. Transparent build system: https://build.voidlinux.eu
Like other distros are keeping things secret?
>2. Comunity-driven repository of package build scripts instead of unclear rpm system.
So chinese and russian and American hackers control the repos?
>3. Rolling-release cycle (also the only acceptable).
Okay this is kind of good but sometimes rolling releases can be unstable.
>4. Godlike binary package manager with option to build package from source with custom flags (as in gentoo) if you want.
I rarely install from source and I never have an issue just git cloning and following the instructions when I do.
>Satisfied?
no

Because CentOS is better

>>56437370
For average user it's not, actually. But if you care about stability and rock-hard safeness, it means a lot.

>>56437408
none of those things listed matter for the end-user, "no bloat" the way you imagine it is actually detrimental.

>>56437348
>0. No bloat.
what is net install
>1. Transparent build system: https://build.voidlinux.eu
yeah, you're gonna sneak something in past redhat....
>2. Comunity-driven repository of package build scripts instead of unclear rpm system.
>unclear rpm system
you have no idea how repos work do you?
>3. Rolling-release cycle (also the only acceptable).
fedora is also rolling release....
>4. Godlike binary package manager with option to build package from source with custom flags (as in gentoo) if you want.
RPMFusion isnt good enough for you, but its good enough for the majority of sysadmins using RHEL and CentOS
>Satisfied?
no, bait harder.
>>56437328
installing programs is the same, just use dnf and yum instead of apt-get, commands are almost identical
start up programs depends on your DE

>>56437429
what is centOS?

>>56437420
Rolling releases are by definition unstable. Do I have to buy a self-serve ad telling people what stable means? It probably wouldn't take, since people who say that are normally too stupid to turn off their adblocker for sites they like.

>>56437420
>>56437446
You know, there's no need to samefag in order to defend youe opinion, it makes you look like an idiot.

File: samefagging.png (80KB, 729x592px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 729x592px

>>56437504
or maybe your arguments suck.

File: dSr82KL.jpg.png (697KB, 640x628px) Image search: [Google]

697KB, 640x628px

>>56437504
I didn't same fag

>>56437445
>none of the things listed mtter for the end user

Care to explain why you think that?

File: 0,,17709315_4,00.jpg (701KB, 4096x2384px) Image search: [Google]

701KB, 4096x2384px

>>56437504
Ha.

>>56437446
>installing programs is the same, just use dnf and yum instead of apt-get, commands are almost identical
nope, just google'd. launchpad won't work, will have to deal with tar.gz and other bullshit.

File: 1470593121868.jpg (154KB, 1059x758px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 1059x758px

>>56437420
> Like other distros are keeping things secret?
Real build output is hidden in nearly all distro repos. Look at ubuntu ppa's for example. They provide only info that current maintainer want to provide. You trust the authors, not control them.
> So chinese and russian and American hackers control the repos?
German, actually. But you can use any mirror you want or create one yourself.
> I rarely install from source and I never have an issue just git cloning and following the instructions when I do.
Okay. Now try to uninstall what you've installed this way. Or use it as dependency. protip: you cant.
> no
So void linux is not your choice.

>>56437518
>>56437522
>he doesn't know

If it was 2009 I may have belived you

>>56437585
im lost m8. why cant you open a terminal and do
$ sudo dnf install "application"
?

>>56437598
i tried that on non-ubuntu distros. they don't find the application. not even screenfetch. maybe i did something wrong every time i tried.

File: (you).png (81KB, 729x592px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 729x592px

>>56437518
>>56437522
>>56437591
ups, forgot image

>>56437627
dnf and yum are specific to RPM (red hat) distros, ubuntu is a .deb (debian family) distro. You need repositories enabled before you can find applications. Is this your first go at using a package manager? or linux in general? Fedora is the polished big boy distro. Ubuntu is kind of for beginners and non-power-users, you wanna be a power user, right kid?

>>56437014
>Researcher tier
Scientific Linux on a 128GB head node hooked up to a massive panasas fs

>>56437589

make uninstall

>>56437655
>Is this your first go at using a package manager? or linux in general?
been using xubuntu for 6 months.
>>56437655
>you wanna be a power user, right kid?
nah, just answring to OP's question.
>>56437655
>You need repositories enabled before you can find applications
yeah, the pain is there.

>>56437640
You suck at paint.

>>56437446
> what is net install
Implying base and coreutils isn't bloated. Also systemd installs by default even in netinstall, so it's no option.
> but its good enough for the majority of sysadmins using RHEL and CentOS
They also swearing. But they forced to use bloat because redhat distros is proprietary standard nearly everywhere.
> you have no idea how repos work do you?
I know how ubuntu ppa's works. I have no idea how redhat ecosystem works, you're right. I aim to simplicity, they aim to paid support sellings, so their advantage is in builing as complicated and clustefucked system as possible. That's all.
That why we're not going to make a deal.

>>56437627

man dnf

>>56437457
> Rolling releases are by definition unstable.
No if distro uses only well-tested versions. (not beta- git- bzr- etc.)

>>56437709
you're delusional buddy.
>>56437684
just google dnf repository adding. i did it once when i installed kodi, and have been able to find everything since.

>>56437729
That's not what stable means, douchebag.

>>56437690
I'd say we have the same level of skill.

>>56437728
Did Not Finish!

I'll be here all week

File: Screenshot from 2016-09-05 10-54-40.png (10KB, 415x89px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 415x89px

>>56437690
People still use Paint? How 2004.

>>56437674
> keeping all source codes on HDD all the time only in able to uninstall some shit in case i need to free up space
Well, it's smart

>>56437744
What stable means?

>>56437779
You talk like source code takes up a lot of space.

i don't care man there's no chance in hell i would ever use an OS called fucking fedora. no fucking way

>>56437040
What does that even mean? Are you too stupid to install Gentoo? Is it too hard for you?

Memes aside Gentoo is the best distro you just have to work for it. And by work I mean type words into a terminal.

>>56437908
What are you running now? Show proofs.

>>56436763
But I am.

>>56437927
Implying I have a gui on any of my Linux machines.

>>56437983
Then fuck off winbaby.

>>56438014
>using a gui
>winbaby
Sure thing Pajeet.

>>56438014
Only hipster faggots use Linux machines as desktops.

>>56437983
Screenfetch and scrot works without gui. You have no excuses just show it or gtfo.

>>56438030
why would you ever want to use windows for anything other than gayming

File: me.jpg (64KB, 905x624px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 905x624px

Boring office stuff like spread sheets: Red Hat, CentOS
Gaming and noobs general: Ubuntu
Entry-level coding: Debian, Fedora
Reale serious coding, top-end server stuff and hacking: Arch

>>56438058

where the fuck did you get that info from?

>>56438058

Hacking isn't exclusive to arch, fag

>>56437012
well memed

>>56438403
you're right, it should be
>hacker wannabe: kali
>Reale serious coding, top-end server stuff and SERIOUS hacking: Arch

File: 1473094040752.png (696KB, 782x788px) Image search: [Google]

696KB, 782x788px

>>56438027
> Makes fun of GUIs
> While browsing 40chins

>>56436763
I'm not fedorable enough to use a fedora operating system.

Why aren't you guys using Slackware?

>run upgrade
>suddenly all the icon labels in XFCE are off
good distro

Even with adding nero or nemo or whatever the fuck repositories Fedora would still crash on startup with proprietary nvidia drivers (yes I'm a pleb). Occasionally I could get it to work by disabling wayland but I think that just happened to work because it didn't every time. I've since switched to Mint on my desktop, work computer is still Fedora.

Don't use Cinnamon/GNOME/MATE though. i3 is where it's at.

>>56436763
>Torvalds

who?

and what the fuck is "linux distro"?

>>56439733
Creator of 4chan

>>56439216
slackpkg is a fucking nightmare

>>56437179
I don't know why someone making a serious comment would list Manjaro under something called "wannabe hacker tier."

>>56437014
>Consumer
You should read your GNU again.
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Consumer

I actually switched from Fedora to Funtoo the other day. So far I'm loving the extra customizability, portage and eselect. But I still think that for an easy out of the box install OS, Fedora is king.

>>56438058
Install gentoo, shitter.

>>56438058
>Server
>Arch

Hope to god this is a troll

>>56444187
no im just hardcore arch 4 life

>>56437049
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umQL37AC_YM

>>56436763
doesn't support non-free software

i like my computer to be more than a FOSS-compliant Facebook machine

>>56437012
>implying systemd needs to be shilled
>implying systemd profits anyone when getting shilled

File: gbYCsUK.jpg (64KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 960x960px

>>56436825

>>56444458
>muh games

>>56444458
It does though? RPM-Fusion has nonfree software.

although I don't know why you want to be a non-free cuck, being able to build something from source that isn't in the distro's repos is great