Just got 2 of those babys for only $199 each. Gonna be one hell

>>56434311
Nice blogpost gaymenfag.

>>>/v/

>>56434311
> asking /g/ if you did good

>>56434320
This is technology and not video games though

File: 2fd1986ba6acba3957476c691051cbd0.jpg (8KB, 209x200px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 209x200px

>>56434311
>4Gb

File: 1412406175023.png (8KB, 473x500px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 473x500px

>falling for the 3.5GB
>twice
>in the second half of 2016

>>56434353
Its actually 4 because I got 2

File: xs1lMSW.png (209KB, 646x509px) Image search: [Google]

209KB, 646x509px

>>56434311
Somehow I think the 398$ would have been better spend on a single newer graphics card.

>>56434311
Now you have to by a 4k 60fps monitor, which are expensive as fuck.

>>56434311
>paying $200 USD for 970s in 2016
Why?
Just buy a 1070 or even a 1060.

>>56434311

>970's

Dun goofed
175 for each at most

>>56434420
3.5gb won't play most games at 4k lmao

>>56434586
Do you even know what a gigabyte is?

>>56434311
>posting this triggering thread on /g/
>it's not even a photo taken by OP (1 (2).jpg)
>this obvious shilling and shitpostign

also
>>"4" GB

>>56434605
I do.

>>56434382
that's not how it works faggot, enjoy your 3.5gb memecard

You fucked up. A single 1070 would have been a much better choice.

>>56434311
Could have gotten a 1070 for the same price and reached identical performance without all the SLI bullshit.

You must be retarded.
>>>/v/

>>56435114
Yeah no 970 sli is much better than a single 1070

File: 4377d6894eb71530222445e5b06c7410.png (19KB, 595x273px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 595x273px

>>56435372
4% performance difference, and it has the issues of sli and it's going to be outdated faster.

dumb