>no decent documentation for WebGL >all WebGL tutorials

File: jim_rash.jpg (337KB, 1250x1250px) Image search: [Google]

337KB, 1250x1250px

>webgl

>>56430398
Oh look, it's this furfag again with his same thread as from yesterday.

>>56430467
There's only two commonly supported forms of in-browser 3D, and WebGL is faster than even plugin alternatives like Unity.

>>56430484
Stop making fun of furries, they have done nothing wrong

>>56430484
What if I told you it had been over a week, and you're starting to lose track of time as you age and settle into a dull lifestyle?

File: gl_ref.png (304KB, 1485x709px) Image search: [Google]

304KB, 1485x709px

>>56430398

Modern OpenGL is pretty similar to WebGL, now, besides a few commands and binding styles. Here's a MEGA GL overview for you to get the basics. You can google the commands needed to transport the data between buffers in webgl.

>no decent documentation for WebGL
>all WebGL tutorials are wrong

If you're writing your own rendering library there's no reason you should have transferable knowledge from OpenGL to start with; if you don't, you shouldn't be bothering with "WebGL tutorials" or using WebGL itself at all.

>all WebGL engines or codebases include more than just bare minimum functionality

three.js is as bare as a rendering library should be without going suckless style full autism.

>>56430569
*should -> shouldn't

File: gl_ref2.png (289KB, 1497x623px) Image search: [Google]

289KB, 1497x623px

Adding some further GL docs, because why not.

2/3

File: gl_ref3.png (304KB, 1485x603px) Image search: [Google]

304KB, 1485x603px

and finally 3/3

File: 1472958497351.jpg (37KB, 348x342px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 348x342px

>>56430622
>tessellating
>using non-procedural textures

>>56430641

sometimes, you just want to map a dickpic image you loaded from the desktop as a texture texture over a ripped halo model

>>56430654
Procedural dick looks better IMO.

File: Penis, mathematical equation 1 - 0b.jpg (22KB, 599x559px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 599x559px

>>56430671

You might be onto something

>>56430683
http://glslsandbox.com/e#34807.0

>>56430746

Inigo Quilez would be proud.

I heard that there were rectennas that could make energy from thermal radiation.
Is the ultimate power generator a fursuit where the fur is actually very fine antennae?

>>56430398
>Be to stupid to learn webgl
>Complain about it on an anonymous Persian tapestry forum

Fuck off retard

Fuck off furfag

>>56433390
It's not that I can't learn it, it's that it's horribly slow.
Think of it like correcting for errors in transmission:
You need two streams of identical information to know when there's an error, and three to correct errors.

I have to use three tutorials simultaneously to learn WebGL and it's fucking annoying.

>>56433422
>namefag
even worse than furries deu

File: 1441047039506.jpg (79KB, 403x498px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 403x498px

>>56433422
>Complaining about furfags
>Namefag

>>56430505
>>56433422
please cut off your face

>>56430505
just like Hitler?

>>56436850
Furries weren't around when hitler was alive. But he would definitely gas them all if they were.

furries are cool

>>56430641
On that note, can you recommend any beginner's resources for someone interested in making procedural textures for fun? Is that something I would do with GLSL?

File: 1469663783752.jpg (54KB, 534x720px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 534x720px

>>56436903
>furries weren't around when Hitler was around
Lol