>watching porn in a no headphone jack world >wireless >everythingisgoingfine

>watch porn in public

I'm not even defending jackless devices.

>>56421038
Why wouldn't it detect when headphones are disconnected/disabled? Also, what about analog through USB-C?

>>56421073

It's not just about phones. Hence, in a "no headphone jack" world. A completely wireless world.

Such a world isn't feasible, and hence, it isn't worth pursuing no matter where you start.

>>56421038
>not disabling the media volume completely when no speakers
You asked for this, most phones have two different media levels, one for no headphones and one for headphones.

>>56421096
I didn't mention phones, that's why I said devices, which also covers laptop and everywhere your little "scenario" may be "valid"

>>56421096
But 'no headphone jack world' doesn't mean 'wireless world'

File: 1408601319276.png (304KB, 789x678px) Image search: [Google]

304KB, 789x678px

>>56421073

>listening to guilt pleasure music in a no headphone jack world
>wireless
>everythingisgoingfine
>suddenly cuts out
>everyone hears your guilty pleasure
>"WHAT IS LOVE"

>>56421096
>Hence

You needed one more for me to take you seriously, sorry.

>removing things is the new added feature

Raise your hand if the thing you wanted most from your next phone was either fewer ports or more dongles/adaptors.

I didn’t think so.

You wanted better battery life, didn’t you? Everyone just wants better battery life.

Vote with your dollars.

I didn't get what you meant, OP.
Did someone turn on a wireless speaker and accidentally hijacked your sound?