>compile firefox >584 compiler warnings present Why

because on major project no one cares about warmings but only for errors

>>56420194
Because 99% of developers are filthy code monkeys.

>>56420194
Warnings are just suggestions.

>>56420340
No they are errors.

>>56420344
Not without -Werror, no

File: HAlHg6U.jpg (78KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 1440x2560px

>warnings
That means shit's all good, son

>>56420363
There are no warnings. There are errors or there are no errors. Warnings don't exist.

Only code monkeys won't agree.

I don't get it either, don't those people want to write correct and future proof code? I will never stand for this shit.
I guess it's because they fell for the "stable" meme and installed ubuntu/debian and their compiler didn't have those warnings because it's old shit.

>>56420344
>>56420374
>warnings are errors
How's your autism treating you?
Sometimes your intended behavior gives you a warning in the compiler. That's just how things go.

>>56420429
Code monkey spotted.

>>56420429
If the compiler throws warnings that shouldn't be then you should rise a bug report for the compiler, not ignore it. Some day your code won't work because a new version of that compiler actually enforces good code and you sit there and don't know what to do.

Because warnings are sexist.

>>56420484
>that shouldn't be

You're a fucking retard, no-one is arguing against that you aspie fuck

>>56420344

>An unused variable is an error

>>56420752
Yes it it.

>>56420756
But it isn't an exception

>>56420194
Depends on what they are.
When developing I turn off -Werror and turn on -Wno-unused-variable, but before I commit I change them back and proceed to squash all warnings possible.
People who ignore compiler warnings aren't really any better than people who ignore memory leaks just because it wasn't a lot of mem or because the process ends where it leaks.

>>56420806
It's an error. If you don't agree you're a filthy code monkey. Case closed.

>>56420830

Not an exception though, you admit

>>56420194
Patches are welcome.

>>56420842
But exceptions are runtime.

>warnings

Warning: This is intended for gcc <=5.2 and you have gcc 5.3

>>56420194
>Why is this allowed?
people want a browser not bulletproofsoftware

>>56421352
Actually that's exactly what a browser needs to be nowadays.