Will the main Windows branch always be Windows NT based

>>56395209
Yes.

>>56395209
MS has literally already extended the linux kernel into Windows.

>>56395209
>muh """"""""""""""""New Technology""""""""""""""""

>>56395327
geez windows, how come your mom lets you have 2 kernels

>>56395209
No ReFS will replace it soon.

File: 1407496737382.jpg (133KB, 1440x810px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 1440x810px

>>56396566
>NT is the same thing as NTFS

>>56396597
NT IS the same thing.
They named it NT to push NTFS.
The the hell do you think NT 4.0 used NTFS and not FAT?

>>56395209
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6suWwnjGKgQ

A E S T H E T I C

>>56395209
Until they switch to GNU/Linux based :^)

>>56396618
this is bait right
right

>>56397104
>NTFS, a journaled, secure file system, was created for NT. Windows NT also allows for other installable file systems; starting with versions 3.1

Windows NT stands for?
NTFS stands for?

Kids these days... even with internet and google to help them they still don't know shit, besides puking excrement out of their mouth in the form of memes.

>>56397136
NTFS was created for NT, not the opposite you fucking retard
Just because Microsoft switches to a new filesystem doesn't mean they'll change the fucking kernel entirely jesus christ

How do you even breathe on your own