how can i trust robots to drive cars if they can't

robot's don't drive cars. cars drive themselves.

>>56380988
isnt the car the robot ? same idea

>>56380975
they should have put in a clause that your companies robotics division must be able to walk before it can drive.

>>56381091
no, it's a car.

I imagine it's easier to design AI that has to navigate on four wheels over one with bipedal movement. But yeah, there's no way I would trust any initial models of self driving cars.

because the wheel is a pretty fucking simple concept to grasp

>>56380975
The code will evolve over time. Some people will die, but those deaths will be used to improve the code and then businesses will market the new features which will lead netsecs finding exploits in the new code and then black hats will cause more deaths, but then those bugs will eventually get fixed and the code will get even better. This is how the tech industry has always worked. Its also important to note that devs are often stoners

File: robot fall.webm (2MB, 698x662px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 698x662px

Not only do they have trouble walking, they can't even turn a simple wheel without falling over.

File: fuck you i'm a robot.webm (616KB, 640x827px) Image search: [Google]

616KB, 640x827px

>>56381907

On the other hand, they do have superior tic-tac-toe strategies.

>>56381251
Explain it to me.

wtf i hate robots now