Daily reminder: don't bought AMD cpus especially if you

>>56375660
Everybody knows this already. Only newfag shills talking about some stupid irrelevant gamer will think there are goys to educate about this subject. There aren't bucko, fuck off

File: 1430709127524.gif (892KB, 260x146px) Image search: [Google]

892KB, 260x146px

>>56375660
>Literal 5+ year technological lag
>Right after Intel switches to lead
>Both AMD and Intel begin to stagnate so hard you'd think OPEC was behind it

>Years of chickenscratch improvements
>A decade later, nothing has changed

No shit.

In all fairness it feels like Intel is letting amd try and catch up, bullshit or not apparently Intel have like 10 years of tech on the bench because amd can't cough shit up.

>>56375660
>don't bought

Fuck off, zipperhead.

File: AMD_Athlon64.png (75KB, 909x1024px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 909x1024px

>>56375900
>letting AMD try and catch up
>letting them
.... you realize they spent years sabotaging AMD when AMD was in the lead and completely demolished AMD's market share through underhanded market tactics despite having an inferior product at the time?

They also ran the other aka "Why are there only two CPU manufacturers", 3rd major Cyrix into the ground through patent lawsuit trolling, which I doubt any of you even remember. AMD let Intel "catch up" back in the day with x86-64 tech. "x64" used to be referred to as "AMD64". Big fucking mistake, considering Intel's history with AMD and Cyrix of trolling.

> amd can't cough shit up
They got shit done before Intel kneecapped them. Now they've got only a fraction of the market income.

AMD has actually won some antitrust suits and litigations against Intel because of it, but like all such things it was far too late and merely a slap on the wrist.

>>56375660
>gaymer
fuck off

>>56375660
If you only need 60FPS, you're fine with AMD. If you're looking for 144FPS, you need Intel.

Better buy x2 GTX 1080s though.

>>56376112
This.

CPUs have been "good enough" for years now.

>>56376050
welcome to capitalism baby
all is fair in love and trade

Its always funny,how in the spec threads they post
their imb4 Intel CPU with low end GPU
but
>AMD SHIT
>Better Intel CPU and shit GPU
kek

>>56376194
?

>>56376050
>AMD let Intel "catch up" back in the day with x86-64 tech. "x64" used to be referred to as "AMD64". Big fucking mistake, considering Intel's history with AMD and Cyrix of trolling.
You're acting as if they had a choice. Intel was gonna give them a fun ride in the courts.

>>56378031
AMD traded with Intel the permission to use their x86, in exchange of Intel using AMD64. Intel could sue the hell out of them if that didn"t happen.

>>56375660
Even the cheapest AMD CPU on that list is maintaining over 60FPS.

>>56378853
AMD already had a irrevocable x86 license.

Where is the X4 845 in that benchmark? You know the current flagship CPU of AMD?

>>56375660
>don't bought
Hi Pajeet