How does /g/ feel about static webms? Pic related is 1.03MB

File: smug_miku_webm1.webm (80KB, 801x1100px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 801x1100px

static webm related is 80KB

File: smug_miku_jpg1.jpg (80KB, 801x1100px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 801x1100px

jpg related is 80KB of course

>>56348819
What about a static webm that moves like a movie?

>>56348860
I know webm is intended to be used for video but the whole point of static webms is to be pseudo WebPs since 4chan won't allow the real thing.

>>56348819
Looks way better than >>56348842, but ever so slightly blurrier than >>56348785

Here is the ffmpeg parameters I used for anyone interested.

ffmpeg -loop 1 -i input.jpg -an -c:v libvpx -qmin 16 -qmax 16 -quality best -t 2 -r 1  output.web

>>56348929
True but it's like 1/10th the file size of the PNG. I know VP8 does not support lossless compression so I gave up trying to make it look 99.99999% of the original image and settled for a "good enough" look. Anyway the most important thing is it shows how fucking outdated JPG is. 4chan would save billions on hosting if they allowed Webp and it's open sores so all the freetards here won't sperg out. Sadly years have gone by and it doesn't look like 4chan will support webp for whatever reason.

>>56348935
*

input.png

Sorry about that.

File: 1443749392321.webm (31KB, 990x476px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 990x476px

>>56348785
testing please ignore

File: 1442234462352.png (622KB, 990x476px) Image search: [Google]

622KB, 990x476px

>>56349187
Holy hell the webm is 32k and the original PNG is 624k what is this magic

>>56349205
Actually just noticed it's losing some high frequency data. Look at the sleeves on their jackets

File: 1465101138142.webm (30KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 700x700px

So transparancy fucks it up

File: 1442091633587.png (362KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]

362KB, 700x700px

>>56349357
original

File: Untitled.png (205KB, 1366x618px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 1366x618px

>>56349357
>>56349374
wut...

not this shit again

File: 1448215278900.png (445KB, 1365x735px) Image search: [Google]

445KB, 1365x735px

>>56349385
Looks like this to me

>>56349205
>>56349238
Still nowhere near as bad a 32KB JPG variant of that image.

>>56349408
>unironically using firecocks
Why aren't you using Chrome or Opera like a normal human being?

>>56349414
true I suppose

File: 1465803133446.webm (8KB, 154x193px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 154x193px

>>56349443
Well if you're talking about the rendering, I think it's a library thing because it looks the exact same in mpv. I switched to firefox after seeing some google history overview page or something where it could fucking pinpoint the sites I was on and their categories, like "you browsed cyberpunk literature from 12:01 to 12:23". No way they aren't selling that shit along with my IP/fingerprint to advertisers. I don't wanna become part of the botnet. Probably going to switch to chromium when I have the time

/autism

>>56349545
k

>>56349443
>chrome
Enjoy the botnet
>Opera
Literally who?

>>56349687
>Anonymous 08/30/16(Tue)23:54:25 No.56349687 ▶
>>chrome
>Enjoy the cocknet