does crunchbang still exist? anyone use the new one these days? too lazy to do debian neitnstal
>>56324373
Theres crunchbang plus plus
https://crunchbangplusplus.org/
It's a little more hobbyist (that is to say smaller and more unprofessional) but has more of the crunchbang spirit
There also exists bunsenlabs Linux
https://www.bunsenlabs.org
This is the more usable of the two. It has its own addable repository, which contains all the packages from the debian testing repository and some of its own( neofetch and some stuff from the ubuntu repos)
Happy installing OP!
>>56324373
Arch is the new crunchbang
>>56324574
How so?
>>56324569
thanks will check into it.I just want quick setup and i can do my own configs as OP pic is an oldie
>>56324569
>https://www.bunsenlabs.org
going to try the bunsenlabs one. same as debian been a while but i should be able to figure it out. hope the installer is decent
>>56324373
thinking of swapping from antergos mate to crunchbang (bunsenlabs) just because I'm bored of it
>>56326263
I also enjoy antergos. But I feel better with openbox on debian. Cinnamon on antergos/arch I enjoy as well
Bunsenlabs is the goat distro tbqh familia
I used it up until two weeks ago when it just would refuse to log in for me. I ended up switching to debian jessie with XFCE.
I think Bunsen labs is the most usable replacement though.
>>56324373
That red on the bar is default ?
>>56324373
Is this the out of the box look?
>>56326387
No. But the conkey is
>>56324574
Sure, if you don't want a debian-based distro.
>>56326436
how do I make mine look like yours
>>56326555
Start here:
https://wiki.installgentoo.com/index.php/GNU/Linux_ricing
>>56324594
I think he means it caters to a similar subset of people.
People who think that certain operating systems are aesthetic and make a point of making a fashion statement out of it.
Not sure how much I agree with that, but I see his point.