Any firefox forks that don't suck? Palemoon doesnt have

seamonkey just implemented that feature

Firefox Nightly

>>56292987
cyberfox

>>56293170
Literally zero reason to use Cyberfox since Mozilla started providing official 64-bit builds.

>>56292987
There's no reason to use a fork.
If there's something about Firefox you don't like you can simply disable/remove it.
If there's something missing, you can just enable/add it.

>>56293367
Is it the same with Waterfox?

>>56292987
S E A M O N K E Y
E
A
M
O
K
E
Y

lol at contrarians such as OP who can't just use Firefox

>>56292987
I have tried numerous forks, alternatives, anything that might or might not work, to try to make Firefox less laggy.

64-bit does nothing.
Cyberfox special encoding does nothing.
That other thing fx firefox or whatever... nothing.

e10s is the only thing that makes Firefox fast. Use Aurora / Developer edition so that you can use it with addons.

File: JqHHCHl.png (897KB, 841x1007px) Image search: [Google]

897KB, 841x1007px

Just use Chrome, faggot

File: 2016-08-27-143323_1920x1080_scrot.png (59KB, 787x241px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 787x241px

????

>>56294801
Not OP. I liked firefox actually. But since they moved to gtk3, I ditched it for seamonkey

>>56293459
He confused it with Waterfox. Cyberfox is nice if you want a slightly more optimized Firefox with Classic Theme Restorer by default. I recommend Seamonkey.

>>56294985
If you use Gentoo, you can compile it with gtk2 instead of gtk3.

>>56294972
lol the weeb furry dev is backpedaling now?