>Zen outperforming Intel's 1000 bucks CPUs. >RX 480

>>56282113
why call 64bit x86 fking gay

>>56282140
yeh i never understand that either

>tfw I just built a new pc with a 6600k and 1070

File: Free.png (240KB, 666x265px) Image search: [Google]

240KB, 666x265px

She's doing good.


>AMD to be used in Future Xbox Systems
>AMD to be used in Future Playstation Systems
>AMD announces x86 licensing deal, $293 million joint venture to build servers for China
>AMD rockets past 100 FreeSync displays

>>56282113
>>Zen outperforming Intel's 1000 bucks CPUs.
in cherrypicked shit benchmarks (who the fuck who can afford a $1000 CPU does CPU rendering in fucking blender)

>>56282113
>>RX 480 killing the 1060 on new games.
1060 3GB is just over half the price of rx 480 and 1070 rapes it

>>56283106
and that was with the intel cpu underclocked, for it to be a fair comparison amd would have to be able to reach the same clocks without the power consumption going through the roof

>>56283127
1070 is just under twice the price of the 480.

also
>1060 3GB
>raping anything
Can't even match a 470, yet it tries to be higher priced.

wew rx 470 and 480 went down in price since the last time i checked, gg they might be ok tier for a budget pc then

File: Screenshot_20160726-003706.png (236KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

236KB, 1920x1080px

>>56282113
Daily reminder

>>56283318
DELETE THIS

File: fing.png (28KB, 557x378px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 557x378px

>>56283318
git gud

>>56283424
The fuck is this image.

File: 140114kore_1024x768j.jpg (126KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 1024x768px

>>56282113
Amada always wins.

>>56283106
pha who buy's CPUs
WHO USES CPUs?

gee I don't know kid, I don't know.

>>56283488
blender is for poorfag freetards who wouldn't buy $1000 cpus

people who would buy $1000 cpus don't use blender

>>56283242
rx 480 or bust. no point in getting a 470 even if you're on a budget

File: IMG0051653_1.jpg (141KB, 960x440px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 960x440px

>>56282113
>Radeon market share up 10% in the last quarter.

File: POO IN GPU.jpg (183KB, 960x655px) Image search: [Google]

183KB, 960x655px

>>56283582
delete this

>>56282113
>>RX 480 killing the 1060 on new games.
if by killing you mean slightly faster
>>Rumors on AMD releasing Vega GPUs as soon as October.
don't get too excited. They said early 2017
>>Apple to include AMD's x86 SoC on next gen Macbooks, the best selling laptops in the market.
not even sure where the hell you heard this
Apple is probably going to put an amd gpu in their next macbook pro, but there's no way in hell they'd put an amd cpu in it.
and if they do go for another amd gpu it's just going to end up like the 2015 macbook where it under performs the 950m in pretty much every task, and uses more power, and causes the whole system to throttle

>>56283318
Unless I can find this in some shill thread once a day, fuck off

>>56283188
Clocks were identical for both chips, power draw should be roughly the same.

AMD just has a better core now. Deal with it.

>>56282113
I wish I had bought more stock when it was really cheap.

>>56283835
AMD clocks worse and is not as power efficient, FX-9590 did run at 5 GHz (with worse IPC) but with a 220W TDP

>>56283867
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819113347

4.7 GHz 220W, overclocks "up to" 5GHz lol

Same shit meme hype was said for the 480, and they pulled a no mans sky

>>56282113
>Zen outperforming Intel's 1000 bucks CPUs.
>RX 480 killing the 1060 on new games.
>Radeon market share up 10% in the last quarter.
Optimistic way of looking at things, still based on facts
>Rumors on AMD releasing Vega GPUs as soon as October.
>Apple to include AMD's x86 SoC on next gen Macbooks, the best selling laptops in the market.
Pure wccft speculation and b8
>>56283535
>muh Maya
Confirmed for not knowing jack shit, Blender is quite used in the industry nowadays
>>56283602
>not even sure where the hell you heard this
Someone posted a 5 year old rumor from a clickb8 site a few hours ago and /g/
>>56283867
>AMD clocks worse and is not as power efficient, FX-9590 did run at 5 GHz (with worse IPC) but with a 220W TDP
gobbled it up
You know the old 'dozers have nothing to do with anything recent from AMD, right?

>>56282531
I hope you bought a 144hz or 4k monitor too
if not then you wasted your money on nothing

gotta love how amd does their benchmarks.
in VERY specific games or applications
with very specific settings
they can sometimes beat something of the competition

who the fuck even shill for amd?

that must be beyond retardation

>>56283318
This.

AMD is complete and total shit compared to their competitors, they are like little fucking kindergartners trying to play with the grown ups.

>>56285423

you talk like you could even get a job at AMD. Maybe when shitposting becomes a money making industry, you'll be a somebody.