Anyone have experience using Void linux?
I'm running a dual boot with Windows 7 and Arch now, but I'm going to ditch Windows since I only use it for games and the ones I play work fine with Wine.
I really like the idea of Void, but with it being so obscure I'm worried about a lack of documentation and packages. Is this an issue?
If Void isn't any good, which is better between Gentoo and Funtoo?
>>56261603
Void is pretty good. There are a lot of packages. Most stuff that is in the stable Arch repos, and a fair amount of AUR stuff is in the void stable. The rest you can make sources for using xbps-src, and then they can be put into the main repos. Or compile the extra stuff that you can't find yourself. I really like the simplicity of runit, and the xbps can be simplified with aliases to get around the retarded amount of package forking they did. Regardless, I use Void on an old as hell thinkpad and it is really light. Recommend it over Gentoo, Gentoo is a literal meme.
>>56261603
There is also plenty of documentation on the website, for things like using sv and runit all the way to doing a netinstall through Arch. I recommend it.
>>56261603
If you liked Arch, you're probably gonna love Void.
The only thing you'll miss at first might me the AUR for a few packages, tough like >>56261665 said, xbps-src and your day is done.
>>56261665
>>56261679
>>56261828
Fuck it, I'm going for it. Worst case I don't like it and just reinstall Arch, but I think I'll really like it (no systemd is also a huge fucking plus)