/script>
If I've already embraced the superior wireless headphone technology, Is there any reason to avoid getting the new iPhone?
>>56236588
see pic related
Ironically I own an iPhone 6 plus, ask me anything.
>superior
I think you misunderstood some things.
>>56236611
Not going to ask you anything because you're a false flagging retard
>>56236623
>Not going to ask you anything because you're a false flagging retard
Nope, I really do own an iPhone 6 plus. I thought it was a good idea at the time but now I'm filled with nothing but deep regret over what I've done.
>>56236612
Enjoy your dangling wires that'll fray and need replacing ;-)
>one more thing to worry about charging at night
You fell for the no Analog port meme
>>56236657
>he listens to 40 hours of music continuously every day
>>56236677
Nope, I watch 4K videos of your mom 40 hours a day.
>>56236654
>he doesn't know about back and forward cable technique that is used by audio industry
>he thinks wireless will last longer than wired
I still own my first-gen iPhone and it's cables that just werk and mint conditioned. Show me a 10 year old wireless device that works without any replacement parts.
>>56236693
You do realize apple has changed every since blow jobs died and they put that degenerate homosexual in charge of the company right?
>>56236693
>10 year old wireless device
Wireless g technology, bitch.
>>56236677
>he thinks people only use headphones just for the sole purpose of listening to music
>he likes the delay between Bluetooth audio and wired audio
>he'll be the first one that lines up at that store to buy a Bluetooth headset that has 3 hours of playback
>he shills for a company that takes out features in to cut time off of manufacturing and increase production
Pls cut it
>>56236813
>he thinks 40 = 3
>he thinks a delay in audio matters when there's no video
>he thinks wireless headphones have a noticeable delay
Go back to your anti wireless circlejerk in hpg gramps, it's not 2012 anymore
>>56236588
Aren't bt headphones poor in audio production? Cut frequencies, capped max kbps, added latency, etc. Have they improved now? Has any of that been squashed?
>>56236854
>Aren't bt headphones poor in audio production? Cut frequencies, capped max kbps, added latency, etc. Have they improved now? Has any of that been squashed?
Is this 2012?
>>56236848
> Anything he thinks that audio ports are obselete and have no place in the modern world anymore
> He enjoys a neutered experience with a non wired "alternative"
>he uses stale ass memes to justify everything
Pls delete your web drivers
>>56236945
(you)
>>56236932
No.
>>56236987
You were supposed to come up with a witty retort not literally answer his question you mong.
>>56236987
>>56237011
>no
>Offers >no explanation
No
>>56237070
>No
Jesus man, have you ever talked with a human being irl before?
>>56237097
He's an attention whore on an anonymous image board, what do you expect?
>>56236657
>having to worry about plugging in to charge once a week is worse than having to worry about plugging it in to listen 10 times a day
>>56236654
I once fell for the wireless headphones meme, it turns out that they are prone to more problems, and I was replacing them every 4-6 months. Wired headphones can last many years, I've already tripled my utility as my current wired headphones are 1.5 years old and still going strong.
>>56237097
he's not even trying and yet you're riled as fuck, lurk moar friend
>embracing wireless anything, the horribly inferior technology
Why have we moved towards the complete shit end of technology lately?
>>56236588
It's an iPhone, so- yes.
>>56237270
Because it's not shit anymore gramps
>>56237097
No
>>56237161
How am I?
>>56237269
How am I rustling anyone's tendy buckets?
And that's the last I'll see of that cancer
>>56237395
If you can't see it yourself then you're beyond saving m8
>>56236644
>deep regret
Why? Its performance is far superior to my note 4's running touchwiz.
>>56237501
I don't think it's a matter of preformance it's more of a matter of losing functionality even today I wish iOS could playback webms or have things that you expect going into android you have to lower your mediums when comparing both platforms
>>56237501
IPhone used to trade blows in performance but now it's just ahead of modern android.
Plus there's no serious loss of functionality anymore.
I'm using a redmi 3 pro right now, but my next phone will probably be the iphone 7s
>>56237624
>forced to run at 1136x640 to keep up with even 3k touchjizz
lagPhone tards will say anything to defend their trash.
>>56237649
The plus is 1080p
>>56237664
>forced to run at 1136x640 to keep up with even 3k touchjizz
>>56236588
Thunderbolt audio is better than regular audio from what i've heard.
>>56237804
>being this thirsty for replies
>>56238155
>damage controlling this hard from your 1136x640 lagPhone
>>56238256
?
>>56238324
>720x1280
>>56238446
I'm still confused.
Is this autism?