Why the fuck does Linux create a second ethernet interface every day without my input?
It's fucking with my UFW rules.
>>56172012
Same reason why windows does the same with public networks
>>56172012
It should always be the same even across installs.
>>56172012
But it's not. Those are two configurations for the same interface, enp3s0
install gentoo
>>56172012
>Why the fuck does Linux
You get what you pay for.
>>56172361
so that's why Windows is so shit, I paid $0 for it
>>56172123
>>56172012
Stop fucking around with a GUI - learn the termina/learn your systeml or go back to Win/OSX:
user@home ~ $ ifconfig -a
eno1: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.1.212 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255
ether 94:de:80:65:26:ef txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 10373 bytes 9191439 (8.7 MiB)
RX errors 0 dropped 447 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 6053 bytes 709224 (692.6 KiB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
device interrupt 20 memory 0xfb700000-fb720000
lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0
loop txqueuelen 1 (Local Loopback)
RX packets 2 bytes 100 (100.0 B)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 2 bytes 100 (100.0 B)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
>>56172120
>Windows does it too, I swear!!!
>>56172500
Why the fuck are you posting the output of ifconfig?
I do cisco shit for a living, the output of ifconfig isn't particularly amazing or relevant.
>>56172500
>24bit netmask
its like you have less than 254 machines
>>56172012
>shitposting VPNs
Give me your life, senpai
>>56172547
To show the unfiltered status of the interfaces and that I don't see any bullshit overlaid by the UX.
The output is relevant in that context.
Fulltime dev here (30+ years)