>As far as I read here, you claim to be expert in C++11, Mr.

File: gd.jpg (42KB, 265x370px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 265x370px

Now the same thing with Punjeeb:

>As far as I read here, you claim to be expert in C++11, Mr. Anon. Can you explain why extern "C" is used? What if I link a library that is compiled with a C++ compiler without using extern "C"?
> I am in knowledge of that answer, sir. And If I may say so, it is the reason that I wrote many lines of codes in cee-sharps and cee-ploos-ploos. I am very knowledge in thes eprogramming languages, sir.
>Okay another question, why would you use const, constexpr, mutable?
> The reson for that, sir, is that in the computer domain there is need for laguage processing techniques which I do posses, sir. And it is that why the code I show here is good and written in the current dot-net language processing machines.
>Sir, you are sweating. Next question, can you explain why zeroing a memory block with memset is slower than traversing the block and setting zero with a for loop with a primitive type that is larger than 1 byte, on an SSE2 CPU and a modern compiler?
>I have graduated top of my school with honors, sir, and have the ability to write this code with the modern language processing skills and it is the reason for my wanting this employment, sir.

>I understand, mr.Sankreet, it's been a pleasure. It says here that you're asking for $9.11/hour is that correct? Well you have a great future here in our company, we look forward to working with you. Have a great day.

Thank you, sir, I am also looking to forward and writing good codes for your company.

>>56162297
Considering how many of them succeed in getting jobs, despite having shit code makes this seem somewhat, even slightly, viable

>>56162297
Uh, sir, are you sure you haven't mistakenly applied to Senior Software Engineer job instead of janitor? With this knowledge, I am afraid I cannot offer you a job that pays more than $2 per day.

>>56162119
None of these questions are C++11 specific. Also, i seriously hope you don't think that memset translates to a repesd on any decent compiler.

>>56162643
>memset slower than for loop

can you understand what you read?

>>56163758
What is slower than a for loop

>>56163758
For loop might be optimized into a single SIMD memory store instruction

>>56165563
that's what I'm trying to explain, why did /g/ fuck up with understanding this simple sentence?