Font rendering thread! Post a screenshot of this page: https

File: Untitled.png (137KB, 1587x732px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 1587x732px

>>56159851
not a fan

>>56160082
In case you didn't know, Firefox screwed the pooch and since 2014 it opens Wiki in the incorrect font size. Press CTRL+scroll backwards once. There, it's not puke-worthy anymore. You're welcome.

File: Screen Shot 2016-08-19 at 18.13.11.png (736KB, 2558x1522px) Image search: [Google]

736KB, 2558x1522px

>superior proprietary rendering

File: a.png (246KB, 1331x972px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 1331x972px

plain freetype

File: fonts.png (127KB, 1637x2126px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 1637x2126px

>>56159851

>>56160477
Font rendering matters much less with larger screen resolutions.

>>56160719
>then

>>56160719

Regardless, with all the things that bother me on a Macbook, the quality of font rendering is superior to Linux (which I have been using for almost 14 years, and that includes playing with infiniality in multiple modes) and far-far-far-far-far more superior to Windows shit.

File: Screenshot (35).png (789KB, 2880x1800px) Image search: [Google]

789KB, 2880x1800px

>>56159851

>>56160596
are you using monospace for everything?

File: Screenshot_2016-08-19_12-18-59.png (298KB, 1711x989px) Image search: [Google]

298KB, 1711x989px

>>56159851
:0

File: text.png (160KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 1366x768px

>>56159851
why does yours look so ugly?

File: Screenshot from 2016-08-19 15-57-58.png (248KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 1366x768px

my rendering makes my dick hard

File: Firefox.png (357KB, 1663x2378px) Image search: [Google]

357KB, 1663x2378px

Windows 7 + Firefox

File: screenshot-en.wikipedia.org 2016-08-20 06-16-37.png (1MB, 1351x2620px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1351x2620px

>>56159851
R8
>I need validation

File: Screenshot from 2016-08-19 13-42-26.png (187KB, 1075x790px) Image search: [Google]

187KB, 1075x790px

>Ubuntu + Firefox

Firefox settings:
>Disable remote fonts/only use local fonts
>All Ubuntu from 10px to 16px

inb4
>1280x800
>16:10

The Dell Latitude E5400 was the closest thing I could get to a T420... I paid $80.00 USD at the local thrift store

What can I use for windows 10 and chromium?

File: font render.png (390KB, 1391x573px) Image search: [Google]

390KB, 1391x573px

Is my rendering good?

File: Screen Shot 2016-08-19 at 5.40.19 PM.png (330KB, 751x883px) Image search: [Google]

330KB, 751x883px

beautiful.

File: Screenshot_20160819-145606.png (172KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 1080x1920px

>>56159851

>>56161229
beautiful
what font?

File: 2016-08-20-040435_1075x622_scrot.png (138KB, 1075x622px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 1075x622px

Arch with Infinality and DejaVu Sans

File: 2016-08-19-17:07:42-scrot.png (249KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 1366x768px

>>56160596
my qutebrowser nigga
That custom CSS is global, right? I wish per-URL CSS was possible.

File: 2016-08-19-17:13:47-scrot.png (207KB, 1366x749px) Image search: [Google]

207KB, 1366x749px

>>56165167
If it doesn't look good close up, something is very wrong. I don't think it shows much.

>>56165799
Which style of DejaVu Sans? Condensed, book?

>>56165986
the title font is different, but the body is the same as mine. Book 10pt or so.

>>56165918
You bumped up the size to make it look better, reduce it and let's see then lol

>>56166007
>>56165870
It's like you're not reading the thread.
Post it yourself, faggot.

>>56166097
I did, it's the Dejavu Sans one
>>56165986
book

>>56166117
Go figure, it's identical.

>>56166228
Ok but you're still a faggot

File: Screenshot_20160819-222415.png (174KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 1080x1920px

Android 6.0.1 - Nexus 5
Please rate

>>56168419
kinda shitty but who cares when the pixels are tiny

File: output.png (307KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

307KB, 1920x1080px

uhhhh

File: 2016-08-20-111905_959x1154_scrot.png (294KB, 959x1154px) Image search: [Google]

294KB, 959x1154px

I think it's pretty nice.

File: Screen Shot 2016-08-19 at 8.30.37 PM.png (535KB, 1805x1090px) Image search: [Google]

535KB, 1805x1090px

>>56159851

File: Screenshot_20160820-005828.png (539KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

539KB, 1440x2560px

>>56159851

>>56159851
I like how now that font rendering on Linux is fixed It's suddenly important to freetards lol

>>56170158
windows users fix their rendering by installing the renderer used by linux

>>56170158
It makes sense, considering we now have a reason to check if it's actually working the best it could, which isn't as much of an issue on other systems.

>>56170158
>I like how now that font rendering on Linux is fixed It's suddenly important to freetards lol
hownew.ru

>>56160477
>install mactype + patches
>install sf display and text font
>same result

Fucking lel