Why the FUCK Jew-tel does this? If you want to make a GPU, make

CPU logic and uncore is more expensive to make than a bunch of GPU ALUs

Economics, go home back to /v/

It's also what most people want.
I know that's hard to believe but it is true

>>56149454
Why? They are blurry slow shitholes.

>>56149391
>You could've made the CPU 8 core
You act like 8 core packages don't exist when they do.

>>56149454
This.

My mom uses an igpu because she doesn't need anything more. Intel is saving us cash by eliminating the need for low end graphics

>>56149481
Believe it or not most people do not play video games on their computers and integrated graphics is more than enough for their needs. Previously integrated graphics would have been integrated into the motherboard chipset but as technology improved it became possible to move most of the chipset into the CPU so that's what they did.

>thinking we need 8 cores

get the fuck out.

>>56149391
Intel has plenty of 8 core CPUs.

I have an i7 in my laptop and i can play games with the integrated gpu too, and i dont mean 10 year old shit gsmes

>>56149391
Normies don't play games beyond candy crush on Facebook

They don't need a graphics card

>>56149391
When are you retards gonna drink bleach so we can have some different threads?

Intel will never move from its dual core standard package until Zen/AMD catches up to them.

Moore's law isn't dead, its being held back by the jews.

>>56150962
>Previously integrated graphics would have been integrated into the motherboard chipset but as technology improved it became possible to move most of the chipset into the CPU so that's what they did.
nah, developing fast interconnects just becomes really expensive so shit got moved into the CPU, where said interconnects are significantly cheaper

>>56152571
practical performance for parallel(multicore) solutions is kinda meh, and it's harder to program for.

>>56149420
im not agree

>tfw you could've saved $50 by taking out the igpu and completely btfo amd prices
Intel fucked up.

>>56152603
Are you saying intel dual core has same performance as intel quadcore?

>>56149391
it's called heterogeneous compute

>>56149391
>oh, it's a "internet neets pretending they know more about how to supply demand/design a product than a fortune 500 company" thread again

>>56149391
Well I use igpu and it is great. I can even play the games that I like without any issues.

"Intel has made more CPU's than I can name, here's why I could do it better than they can."

File: wintel.jpg (681KB, 1057x1761px) Image search: [Google]

681KB, 1057x1761px

>>56149391

>>56154372
fuckin saved.

I wish these fucking people could understand this.

File: 1467041206078.jpg (63KB, 320x244px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 320x244px

GO AMD GO

>>56154372
True, but you'd shave off 50 dollaronies and that'd be enough for me to want to get rid of the iGPU

>>56154646
Same price.
Maybe at most a 10$ cut if AMD's done something recently

>>56154646
>True, but you'd shave off 50 dollaronies and that'd be enough for me to want to get rid of the iGPU
They'd sell it for the exact same price and you know it.

Mostly because if they didn't have it in there they would have it in the chipset, where it wouldn't cost any more than it does now.

>>56149391
They make CPU's without iGPU, you know that right?

Buy a Xeon you fucking cuck

>>56151648
>Intel has plenty of 8 core CPUs.
Made from 16 or 22 core ones they broke on purpose just to inflate prices.

There are Xeon CPUs without iGPUs.

>>56150733

At 5 times the cost.

I know that packaging 8 cores in a single package is a lot of work, but that's not a reason to make it 5x the price

>>56156864
>>56156911

And those come without over clocking, anon.

>>56157424
The reason to make it 5x the price is because they can.

>>56157468
Some xeons are unlocked

>>56157491
The server processor market is completely different. AMD does the same shit with their opterons and shit.
Well, back when they had high-end processors.

>>56156893
They don't bin chips that severely. The i7e die is distinct from their larger Xeon dies.
Intel fabs something like 4 different dies just for mainstream desktop and mobile chips. The benefits of being a $50,000,000,000 per year company.

>>56153814

Just a few $ max.

People still want an all-in-one sollution and An Intel with iGPU is a great option. Don't forget that only some manchildren wouldn't use the iGPU.

>>56153814

igpu like the HD 550 cost maybe $15

>>56149454
Not true for desktop market, especially high end

File: 1456999729256.jpg (16KB, 252x255px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 252x255px

>>56158326
High end desktop market is vidyagaems and workstations.
Even if the igpu was removed and replaced with MOAR COAR it wouldn't make a difference in vidyagaems, and workstations already use 8+ core CPU.