Why are the mobile version of websites so much better than

>>56133597
Possibly because everyone has a smartphone now.

>left
Normal functional-looking website.
>right
Nu-male cuck dark theme edgy website.

I hope this is b8.
>Better
>HTML 5 web 5.0 css 3.0 material design 50k js loc google analytics garbage
Not that it matters considering the quality of the site you posted.
google chrome and smartphone singlehandedly ruined web browsing

>>56133626
yeah I hate that.

>>56133664
>50k js loc google analytics garbage
Reddit even changed ALL links JS.
Why? To force tracking, affiliate garbage (yes, they will append affiliate tags on your URLs) and make the links useless on demand.

>>56133987

https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/20752-reddit-link-hijack-remover

>>56134571
huh, I was counting on the opt-out preferense.
Apparently there are some "bugs" even after turning it off.

>>56133597
Oh no. Mobile reddit is awful. You slightly tap in the wring spot and it immediately navigates you to a separate page begging you to log in, making you lose your spot.

Also, annoyingly, if you click on a post it takes you to the comments page, where you need to click on the post again to view it. And it doesn't even show you all the comments, only the top 5 or so.

Also also the buttons are hideously unresponsive. It's a crapshoot if clicking on something will actually work or not.

Also also also most mobile sites don't even work on my old tablet. I actually need to load the desktop site to get it to even work properly. Can't we go back to Nintendo DSi-era mobile sites? Those worked great.

>>56133597
>>56133987
>>56134571
>>56136401
Go back.

>>56133597
So they don't fuck people's data plans, they keep the ads to a minimum and remove a lot of the extraneous shit; basically all the stuff you'd typically see in a sidebar.

Since there isn't a whole lot of horizontal space to work with, elements are arranged in a linear manner; no inset items that send your eyes all over the place.

They also reduce navigation options to the very minimum of what's needed for on-the-go browsing. For better or worse ... One thing. I don't like about Twitter's mobile website is I can't do live search results, (re: the latest tweets matching your search.) It canonly display the popular tweets.

>>56133597
probably because you're a brainless nigger that will get distracted too easily if anything than the bare minimum of information is presented to you.

File: 02JBAeG.jpg (41KB, 523x801px)

41KB, 523x801px

>>56133661
Its dark to save battery and so you can look at that shit at night.