https://www.techpowerup.com/225081/ high-pcie-slot-power-dra

So? The only thing this changes is that reference cards can't display the PCI-E logo, only vendor cards that comply with the PCI-E spec.

>>56123009
Seems the AMDefense Force is in full force.

>s...so... So what if the 480 is literally so bad that it's the first card in the last 20 years to actually be shunned by PCISIG?
>i...it... It's still good! You have home owners insurance right?

File: amd.jpg (138KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 653x726px

>>56122799
DELET

>>56123209
>>56123240
>>56122799
So how does this affect the 480?

>>56123261
It proves 480 is out of spec and can damage your pcie slot. Amdrones doing damage control for a month here were wrong and really pathetic.

File: 1444004190699.jpg (115KB, 1328x1096px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 1328x1096px

>>56122799
You had ONE job Pajeet.

>>56122799
>What this means for AMD is that it cannot display the PCI-Express certification logo on the product or its marketing materials

This card is a fucking meme...

>just remember guys
>competition is good!
>after an AMD product burns down a poorfag's house they can buy An Intel+NVIDIA system with the insurance money!

This is several week old news. Why is TPU running that article now?

It's not actually news because that listing is 100% optional and almost everyone on /g/ probably has a graphics card that's not listed there.

>>56123501
>spot the amdpajeet

Literally a house fire waiting to happen... even for a card which is relatively low power.

>>56123501
>they lost the PCI-Express certification yesterday
>old news

File: ishygddt 3.jpg (98KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 1280x720px

>buying the original card
>ever
not even nvidiots do this

>>56123534
>not wanting a reference cooler when you're forced to sandwich cards

File: reviews-awards-logo-hardocp.jpg (6KB, 180x95px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 180x95px

APOLOGYSE, [H]ARDOCP WAS RIGHT

>>56123278
>and can damage your pcie slot
Its just saying its out of spec. Same shit happened before with asus i believe. They just took the logo and thats it. No fucks given. But keep baiting :)

>>56123534
>trust the AIBs over AMD
>a good thing

Nvidia are evils but AMD are incompetent

>>56123539
Not him, but that super XOTAC 10xx series is the only huge ass card I know of, and more mobos are starting to make actual space for SLI and two slotters in general.

File: headcrab.jpg (547KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

547KB, 500x375px

>>56123542
APOLOGIZE
>>56123534
>nothing to see here goyim

File: 28518-hi.jpg (116KB, 596x570px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 596x570px

>>56123578
>more mobos are starting to make actual space for SLI and two slotters in general.
I have a EATX board and am still stuck having to sandwich them

>>56123542
s-sorry

>>56123531
they did not lose any certification. The source literally says that the RX 480 meets all the necessary PCI-E compatibility tests as AMD claimed. The vast majority of graphics cards you can find in stores do meet the requirements but are not certified either. It's simply a pointless certificate.

>>56123698
>complying with a specification
>is pointless

>not certified either
Being a member and certifying your shit is required if you want a PCI vendor ID
https://pcisig.com/membership/member-companies

And for fucks sakes, AMD is on their board of directors.

>>56122799
0.1 nvidia reward points has been deposited into your account

File: amd2.jpg (52KB, 568x612px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 568x612px

>>56123780

File: 1470765698010.png (45KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 600x600px

Why does the fucking card need to draw so much power out of the PCIe slot alone?

Isn't that what the PCIe connectors are for, from the PSU?

Why does this confirm my suspicion that AMD cards are needlessly power-hungry and, incidentally, have shitty drivers that crash all the time?

>>56123753
MSI is a member
Not a single MSI GPU is on the intergartors list

ASUS is a member
Not a single ASUS GPU is on the integrators list

Gigabyte is a member
Not a single Gigabyte GPU is on the integrators list

Sapphire isn't even a member.


Notice a pattern here?
It's a meaningless certification and most manufacturers just don't bother with it.

>>56123804
>Implying anyone who dislikes Nvidia is a AMD faboi

Nvidia fanboi detected
My computer has nothing AMD, I don't own a graphics card

Install new drivers or buy AIB.

What's difficult here? Do Nvidia fags avoid new drivers from fear of the GPU blowing up?

>>56123811
And now have shitty drivers which underclock the GPU to keep it from breaking your motherboard, because they wanted to save half a cent by using a 6 pin rather than 8 pin connector.

>>56123823
https://pcisig.com/developers/integrators-list
>However, many companies do refer to the list when making company-to-company purchases.

This basically means AMD will get sued because they committed fraud when they sent their reference designs off to gigabyte, asus, msi, etc to base their cards off of, and it actually wasnt compliant when they said it was.

>>56123811
This is what happens when you put pajeets in charge. Just look at microsoft. Streetshitter Nutella makes Ballmer look like a fucking genius.

>>56123833
>Install new drivers
>trusting software to solve a hardware defect
amdrone logic defies reality

>>56123850
>Armchair internet lawyer
Literally none of the GPUs I ever owned are on that list. It is fucking meaningless certificate.

>>56123906

It worked out so well for 3.5gb right? /g/ told me drivers will fix that.

>>56123906
AMD will just underclock and undervolt it so it doesn't fry your mobo.Probably that's the reason they've fucked OC limit in their latest driver " fix". ;^)

>>56122799
>PCI-SIG sets limit for power-draw from PCIe
>doesn't test for power-draw
Uh, ok.

>>56123850
you mean just the Nvidia with the 1080?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXUo1S55ZUM

>>56123908
>AMD spends tons of time and money certifying their products because it is meaning less

>>56123950

>what is WHQL

>>56123955
WHQL is for certifying it works with windows and doesn't crash it. Not that it isnt going to start a fire on your motherboard

>>56123980

> Not that it isnt going to start a fire on your motherboard

Nah, WHQL is only good for setting fire to your gpu (yes, Nvidia infamous card killing drivers were WHQL).

>>56124008
You have no proof that that wasn't a isolated incident Amdfags blew out of proportion.

File: Screen Shot 2016-08-17 at 4.57.06 AM.png (219KB, 1612x754px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 1612x754px

>>56124008
cool story bro

Remember the time were amd didn't release a driver in nearly a year and when they finally released one it killed cards?

>>56124022
>>56124029

>ITT denial

http://www.zdnet.com/article/warning-nvidia-196-75-drivers-can-kill-your-graphics-card/

Oh and Nvidia's first win10 driver did, in fact, crash windows.

http://gadgets.ndtv.com/laptops/news/windows-10-is-killing-nvidia-graphics-cards-720443

Also: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sRo-1VFMcbc

>>56123534
Yes, they do. And they pay more for it.

>>56123941
lol what?
All high end nvidia reference cards thermal throttle.

>>56124053
>zero sources on the article
seems legit and certainly not click bait

>>56124067
>its fake when nvidia does it!

File: Screen Shot 2016-08-17 at 5.03.17 AM.png (52KB, 1690x128px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 1690x128px

>>56124075
>>56124053
>Also: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sRo-1VFMcbc [Embed]
Intentionally overclocking a card to the point which it breaks and then blaming the drivers, pic related from your video

>>56124075

There's not a single confirmed report of a 480 exploding a motherboard, but /g/ accepts it as fact.

There are confirmed reports of Nvidia drivers killing hardware, but thats just lies from the Illuminati.

http://modcrash.com/nvidia-display-driver-damaging-gpus/

https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/862417/geforce-drivers/windows-10-geforce-drivers-are-killing-samsung-and-lg-notebook-lcd-display-panels/

Nvidia cards have not damage anything

AYYMD cards have damaged and killed motherboards

>>56124098
>>56124053
Whats even funnier is not only did they overclock it by 30%, they overvolted a normally 365 watt card by 10% as well. This totally isnt going to fucking fry it. Jesus fucking christ you're retarded for posting it

>>56124127
>more overclocked cards

>>56124127
>https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/862417/geforce-drivers/windows-10-geforce-drivers-are-killing-samsung-and-lg-notebook-lcd-display-panels/
>Another Alienware 18 has contacted me privately that had this problem. He was able to recover by clearing the CMOS/NVRAM,

stay mad anon you got BTFO with your shitty card. i'm going to sleep since it is clear youre too butthurt to be bothered to read any of the "sources" youre posting

>>56124170
They "fixed" the issue by imposing a lower power limit and significantly decreasing the memory clock.

All of that effectively lowers the entire performance of the card making the current benchmarks a false representation of the RX480. Scummy amd tactics as usual.

>>56124276
>this many lies in just one post
200 rupees have been deposited into your account and you get a day off.

>>56124286
>can't refute it
Today you'll shit in the loo, pajeet. No street for you.

File: Capture.png (14KB, 618x187px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 618x187px

>>56124286
>>56124536
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/AMD-Polaris-Hardware-261587/News/Radeon-RX-480-Fix-PEG-Leistungsaufnahme-1200744/

the new driver actually improved performance.

200 rupees have been deducted from your account for not abandoning thread when your lies were called out.

Fuck amd. The sooner they die, the better.

File: 1424715856582.jpg (32KB, 312x342px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 312x342px

>>56124900

File: 1470457029422.jpg (41KB, 263x383px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 263x383px

>>56124900

>>56123278
>can damage your pcie slot

There's no tangible proof of any PCI-E slots being damaged by RX480 running at stock settings.

>>56124998
>>56125176
Epic memes pajeet. How about you make a quality high end product and take my money?

>>56125330

I don't think you understand the implications of what would happen if AMD were to vanish into thin air.

>>56125361
AMD hasn't been competetive for like 6-7 years.

>>56122799
Lmao

AMD is so fucking incompetent

File: 1463063188277.png (77KB, 637x832px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 637x832px

When is Nvidia releasing a card that's worth buying? The 295 was top card for a couple years and now the Fury X just demolishes memecal cards.

>>56123811
Because AMD is retarded

They can't even get something as simple as power draw on their cards right

>>56124900
This. Jesus Christ this company needs to off itself. They are a danger to consumers.

>>56125285
>>56123554
BTFO
T
F
O

>>56124053
AMD didn't even have a WHQL driver for the RX 480 for Windows 10 at launch.

>>56125501
>WHQL is important goys

kys, goyvidias whql drivers crashed win10.

>>56125534
NO DRIVERS LMAO

>>56122799
slowest of pokes

>>56125501
Neither nvidia or amd have drivers for windows 10.

>>56123833
Considering Nvidia actually has history of melting cards with bad driver updates it isn't that farfetched.

>>56125617
Nvidia and Intel both did on day 1.

>>56125640
>Inb4 THAT WUZ LITRALLY ON TIME NVIDIA IZ SUPR GUD

>>56125640
lol
Radeons used to have like a 20% ram failure rate in the first 6 months back when they still released reference cards.

>>56123501
>This is several week old news. Why is TPU running that article now?

TPU is a known nvidia shilling site.

Their top AMD related forum topic is still "we won't be revieweing the Fury because we weren't sent free samples".

>there are people ITT who prefer to pay monopoly-prices for their CPU and gfx-cards
I want Bernouts to leave.

>>56124053
>Oh and Nvidia's first win10 driver did, in fact, crash windows.

When the 8800 cards came out, they said it had DX10 support, but did not release proper Vista drivers for a while. iirc they got sued for it.

>>56124900
If AMD dies now, the Geforce 1180 will cost $800 retail, $1000 founders edition, and street price will start at $1500. It'll also be 20% faster than the 1080 only.

>>56125676
>there are people ITT who buy inferior hardware that hasn't been able to keep up with the competition for a decade

Move up from McDonalds, Pedro.

>>56125709

Nvidia leant on ubisoft to remove DX10 from the first assassin's creed game.

File: AMD.png (40KB, 650x470px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 650x470px

ITT: idiot fanbois who want to be ass-raped up their wallets by monopolies with no competition, and who haven't been paying attention to recent financial news.

Everyone on this board is so pathetic sometimes. You guys mock reddit but at least they can have an educated GPU discussion without spewing misinformation and fanboying like manchildren.

Yes, the 480 draws over PCI spec. No, it's not going to kill your motherboards. People have proven than even cheap mobos can handle over twice the power draw of the spec and still be undamaged. Engineers don't design boards so that they'll spontaneously burn up if you go 1W above the spec, that would be retarded.

Just buy whatever card you want, neither is going to melt / burn your mobo. Unless you guys can actually find proof of a 480 destroying a mobo (and I mean actual pictures, not just someone trolling on a forum), then stop spreading your misinformation.

>>56125811
>token competiton
Intel and Nvidia charge whatever they want now. It's better if amd dies or at least someone buys ATi back. Actually ATi went to shit since AMD bought them.

File: nvidia.png (25KB, 626x455px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 626x455px

>>56125811
Is that supposed to be good?

Look at Nvidia, literally 10x better than AMD.

File: 2016-08-17_162501.png (37KB, 653x482px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 653x482px

>>56125811
>>56125865
Just stop fucking the corps already.

>>56125813
>People have proven than even cheap mobos can handle over twice the power draw of the spec

That's bullshit, see this video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rhjC_8ai7QA

The 480 power issue is a very real problem and it's just a sign of how fucking incompetent AMD really is.

>>56125865
Nvidia profits were up literally like 800% from last year.

File: mobo-killed-by-480.jpg (270KB, 2017x601px) Image search: [Google]

270KB, 2017x601px

>>56125813
Really? You are the one spreading misinformation, there are tons of mobos damaged by 480s. Here's just one pic.

>>56125865

You are just looking at the price of a share of stock, which is meaningless absent context. If you look at market cap, you see that nvidia is worth ~6 times AMD, not 10. And in terms of an investment, AMD has increased in value ~3.5 times in a year, whereas nvidia has ~2.5 times.

You would have had better returns by investing in AMD.

Anyways, that's besides the main point, which is that AMD is not anywhere close to bankrupt and finished.

>>56125928
Nvidia paid dividends of like $1.50 per share though.

>>56125918

Why isn't the damage being caused at the PCI-E slot?

>>56125443
Still triggered tripfag?

>>56125939
OK, then Nvidia would have had a ~255% return instead of a ~250% return. Still less than AMD's ~350% return.

>>56125885
>- I should clarify. The only motherboards that will likely experience any issues are those with terrible power delivery integration or boards from ~2006 and earlier featuring PCIe 1.0 and 2.0 revisions. Most modern boards - even the cheap ones -shouldbe fine.

If it only affects 10 year old boards or boards with terrible power delivery in the first place is it really an issue? I didn't watch the whole video but was the only issue that the computer kept shutting down? That's not "hur dur fry your motherboard" as everyone's claiming.

File: dead-company.png (2KB, 897x35px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 897x35px

>>56125928
Really? Look at AMD's net income.

This is in NEGATIVE MILLIONS for the last 3 years.

AMD is bleeding money ridiculously fast, they are on a downward slope to dead.

>>56125953
AMD didn't fucking pay any dividends I don't think you understand how dividends work.

When a company makes a shitload of money they pay their stock holders. AMD didn't.

there's non-ref cards with 8 pin connectors. people who buy leaf blower reference cards are idiots

>>56125953
do this board a favor and just filter that tripfag

>>56125975
it depends on the dividend policy the company uses there's 3 main types, residual, stable and i don't have an accountancy book on me so not sure about the third

>>56125918
Link to thread to prove image isn't just renamed? The PCI connection are much thinner, I would assume the damage would be done there instead. This looks more like a short.

>>56126005
True but it still kind of shows that AMD isn't profitable unless you are just trading stock.

>>56126018
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1433925.msg15438155#msg15438155

Guy had to return all 3 of his 480s because of this issue.

>>56126039
>bitcoin
grandpa pls

>>56125975

You really don't understand stocks. Dividends are nice to have, but are generally paid out by companies that aren't expecting to significantly expand.

In any case, if Nvidia pays out a dividend every year, and last year it paid out $1.50 per share, then here's what happened:

You started with $1,000 worth of shares of Nvidia at the beginning of the year, which were valued at ~$24 a share, so you had ~42 shares. At the end of the year, they were valued at ~$62 a share, so your 42 shares are now worth ~2,600. Plus they paid out your $1.50 dividend on each share, so you got an extra gain of $63. Your total net gain was ~$1,663.

Now take that same thousand dollars you started with and put it in AMD. You end up with ~525 shares, which are valued at ~$1.90 each. At the end of the year, each share is worth ~$6.75. So your 525 shares are now worth ~$3550, which is a net gain of ~$2550.

AMD was the better investment.

>>56125992

Good advise. I just woke up cranky this morning and with a desire to argue with shitposters.

>>56126074
You didn't gain any money, you would have to sell the stock to do that.

>>56126091
No shit sherlock. Shares of stock are liquid assets.

>>56126039
So a dude using three cards at full load 24/7 to mine bitcoin without powered PCI risers still can't fry his PCI slots? I think people using a single card for gaming should be fine then.

>>56126111
I would rather have shares that pay dividends then wait and see if someone is willing to buy useless AMD shares for more than I paid.

File: QGBf6pi.png (282KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

282KB, 480x480px

>>56126130
FILTERED

>>56126143
Typical AMDtard can't handle the truth.

>>56124059
Wew lad

>>56126019
There are hundreds of high profile, high profit companies that pay no dividend.

It's a policy decision and reflects in no way on the success of the company.

I don't own any AMD products but I can't let you get away with this blatant misrepresentation. You clearly don't know shit about stocks or how companies publicly trade their stock.

>>56126396
Butthurt AMDfanboy cowering in front of the truth again

>>56126396
>I don't own any AMD products

Well at least you have that going for you, which is nice.

>>56125728
At least he has a job. I don't believe someone with not even the faintest inkling of economics or the value of money and also posts on 4chan would.

Take it easy on mum's credit, would ya.

>>56126019
>>56126091
>>56126130
>>56126317
>>56126410
Samefagging this hard.
>Damage control mode engaged.

>>56126130
You do realize that you are essentially saying the following:

>I would rather have $63 in cash and $2600 in my checking account than $3550 in my checking account.

There is no worry that someone won't buy shares of AMD stock. The share price is the price that someone will purchase those shares. Trades execute in fractions of a second.

>>56124098
Not him but his article specifically referenced 196.75, not 267.52. Thank you for bringing another issue to light though, truly you've proved that NVidia have the best drivers.

>>56122799

What difference does it make? Ref cards are Shit yes we know.

Amd Fucked up the launch again.

My two Asus 480 cards are good and the pcie logo is on the box.

Also you mad Nvidia slave?

http://fudzilla.com/news/processors/41362-amd-and-mediatek-see-sales-increase

>>56123857
>streetshitter Nutella

Lold

>>56125966

Thats not true. They are in a hole because of a loan. But the loan is getting smaller and smaller fast. They are still 'losing' money because they are repaying it back asap.

With the rx series and actually shifted more gpus in July than Nvidia did.

>>56126561

Isn't most of AMD's debt due 2020 anyway? Not that they are leaving said debt until the last minute as you point out.

Why couldn't the 480 simply be slightly better than the 1060, a bit cheaper and not have idiotic flaws like this? It can't possibly be that hard to catch up to a midrange card and then charge a bit less than nv's omegajew prices to win the competition.

People going on about power usage the 480 uses probably have power usage +50 in msi afterburner.

>>56123261
OEMs won't buy them. This is very bad from a business perspective and AMD doesn't have any wiggle room with screw ups like this.

>>56125811
>wants market share
>majority of sales in that price range are from system integrators/OEM sales
>integrators/OEMs won't touch RX 480 after losing PCI-Sig cert

good luck with those market share gains AMDumbass

>>56126793
I loved how that pajeet bullshitted his way through the launch with that crossfire aots display while telling everyone they could have VR for $200 all while staring at a fucking twitter feed that was probably spammed with POO IN THE LOO.

>>56125447
>>>/pol/ is that way

>>56126862
wew lad yeah ignore that sharia creep, it worked so well for Britain.

>>56126898
yeah okay then. please stop derailing threads. you don't even discuss technology most of the time.

>>56126914
Its an AMD vs Nvidia thread, get off your high horse you will never see one without shit flinging.

>>56126964
that's fair, but you don't even try to keep it tech related.

>>56126986
>Seriously responding to an obvious troll that uses a trip
Stop that. Even if you've been here as little as a week, you should know better.

>>56126986
You are off topic shit posting right now bro.
Pot meet kettle.

>>56127027
okay.

>>56127034

I don't like the cut of your jib, son.

>>56126964
It's really an "AMD done fucked up again" thread, or a "I fucking told you so" thread. nVidia really has nothing to do with the topic.

All those drones claiming the power issue wasn't a big deal - it will cost AMD literally tens of millions of dollars in sales minimum.

I don't want AMD to fail but it's so easy to root against them with the blind euphoric irrational exuberance of the majority of AMD fans on this board and many, many other places.

>>56122799

>ITT: A/v/tists

File: 1471397846624.png (165KB, 578x691px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 578x691px

Hello, please delete this thread, thank you.

>>56127219
yes do this

>>56126898
sharia courts are for civil matters, about as legit as judge judy

>>56127252
About as legit as your corner market not selling booze or pork anymore.

just get a third party RX480 nitro from sapphire, it has 8-pin power instead of 6-pin

>>56122799
>techpowerup

not surprised.

>>56124084
amd would have just left it up for months..

what's your point pajeet?

>>56124127
>not a single confirmed report

https://community.amd.com/thread/202410

>but but nvidia does it

damage control

>>56126471
Those Asus 480's cost a fair sight more than the ref.

There are two fan GTX 1060's for far cheaper.

>>56125433
no 1080 in sample, benchmark goes in the trash.

We had this thread everyday when the RX480 came out. Don't you get tired?

>>56126143
>you his mom's black devil
>this is my ice cream

what

>>56122799
>techpowerup

hAhahAHAHhahHAHahhahHAhAHAhHAhahHAhAhAhAHHAah

>>56129762
>constipated pajeet

>>56122799
>amd literally burning your pc

>>56129762
>amd users are pandeeps with defective keyboards

>>56128562
Take 2 second to look his Mobo there water/ Spill damage. There Oxidation everywhere on the component, and it's been pointed out before.

When will you learn to be critical of things you read?

>>56131310
Uhh the motherboard was completely fine until he put the 480 in it.

>>56122799
rx480 never had PCI SIG listing, what are they talking about?

>>56126664
You don't understand just how outclassed AMD is by the competition. They are like little kids trying to compete with adults. They have no chance in hell of making a decent product anymore.

>>56126561
Uhh no, look at their balance sheet. Their losses are directly from the expenses in their GPU and CPU divisions.

If AMD wants to survive they need to jettison their desktop business, because it's not making them any money.

>>56131957

> a 480 automagically causes oxidation

File: amdtard.png (8KB, 351x163px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 351x163px

>>56126436
AMDtards being delusional again.

>>56132046
>oxidation
Not the same anon but do you mean rust? Because it looks scorched and that can happen with an electrical short.

>>56132051
nice paint skills bro

>>56132150
I know right. I just painted the insides of ur mum white.

'Hi Anon,

Thank you for your email. PCI-SIG is unable to comment on individual companies or products and cannot mandate how manufacturers implement PCIe technology into their final products. Ultimately, it is up to the manufacturers to implement the specification as outlined and communicate to their customers the technical capabilities of the product.

PCI-SIG does not certify products. If a company wishes to have their product included on the PCI-SIG Integrators List, it must participate in the PCI-SIG Compliance Workshops to perform interoperability and compliance testing against PCI-SIG test modules. Products that successfully pass all of the required compliance tests will be formally labeled as compliant PCIe products and can be added to the PCI-SIG Integrators List.

Please let us know if you have any additional questions or if we can be of further assistance.

Best Regards,

PCI-SIG Administration
3855 SW 153rd Drive
Beaverton, OR 97003
Phone: (503) 619-0569

Fax: (503) 644-6708

Email: [email protected]'

Now shut the fuck up Nvidiots.

>>56123278
Honestly hope it does since coin miners bought up all the stock

Regular users wont even notice anything since the latest drivers fix the fan and power defaults and the card cant be overclocked.

>>56123906
>3.5
>software async

>>56134477
>software async
Please tell me you are not trying to perpetrate the myth that Pascal doesn't have hardware async?

>>56122799
>AMD released a software fix
Wow, it's fucking nothing.

>>56132133
Copper doesn't rust, it oxidises.

>>56134535
>VRM is controller by a chipset
>Hurr durr, can't fix it with firmware update

>>56123857
>makes Ballmer look like a fucking genius
That's not possible. Ballmer is one of the dumbest motherfuckers on the planet.

>>56134535
Guess what, the software fix doesn't even work. That's why it's still uncertified, it's still going over the limit.

>>56134852
You're full of shit. Also, see >>56133944. Then you can fuck off.

File: 480-not-fixed.png (16KB, 656x212px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 656x212px

>>56134871
It's true, it's not fixed, pic related.

The MB slot current should be 5.5A or below and it's at 5.7A even in compatibility mode.

That's why the 480 will never be PCI certified because it still doesn't pass the limit.

>>56134499
>myth
Pascal does not have true async. See how we can play this game with no sources?

>>56134979
>Pascal does not have true async
>true
Are you confusing "AMD" with "true?" If so, I suggest you go look up what async means in DX12. It isn't set by AMD standard but MS standard.

>>56134979
Pascal does have true hardware async

http://www.anandtech.com/show/10325/the-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-and-1070-founders-edition-review/9

>>56123493
>poorfag
>owning a house or even having insurance on their rented shithole

>>56135004
>inb4Anandtechisnvidiashillsite

>>56135002
There are plenty of people trying to use pascals Async but they can't get access to them.

Async tests etc.

>>56135058
[citation needed]
Are you confusing Maxwell with Pascal?

File: async.png (17KB, 650x300px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 650x300px

>>56135058
Really? Looks like it's working just fine here.

>>56135107
>Spy Benchmark

>>56135122
An AMDrone rejecting an AMD accepted benchmark? Whodathunkit?

>>56135173
I run the 3.5GB card, fuck off with your side mentality.

File: Falcon is an AMDrone1.png (641KB, 2041x1243px) Image search: [Google]

641KB, 2041x1243px

>>56135199
>I run the 3.5GB card, fuck off with your side mentality.
Just like Falcon? You cannot be biased because you are not completely retarded?

Given how it seems you believe the 970 only has 3.5gb of addressable memory I'd say you are just as bad of an AMDrone as he is if you are not the same person just not using your tripcode.

File: download (2).jpg (4KB, 200x144px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 200x144px

>>56127277

Hey faggot,

Pajeet here,
Just wanted to let you know jewtel and nvidiots have nothing now on my sweet polaris and vega technology.
We at AMD have now bought pooing in the loo to the masses in india and worldwide with our curry architecture.

File: dont-believe-his-lies.png (370KB, 798x333px) Image search: [Google]

370KB, 798x333px

>>56135296

>>56135199
Oh, and I should note, your pathetic attempts to claim you are not an AMDrone does not in anyway substantiate your AMD talking points. I'm surprised you didn't also try to perpetuate the myth that Nvidia is gimping its old cards via drivers.

it was fixed months ago with a driver update. 480 is still the best price/performance card in its market segment and amd sold zillions of them. 15 year old shitposters continue to be boring.

>>56135508
It was not fixed, see >>56134955

>>56135540
>unsourced screenshot from who knows what article from how long ago

that's nice. every other source on the internet says it has been.

File: 21-Overview-Wattage.png (30KB, 727x699px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 727x699px

>>56135620
Nope, in fact every every reviewer found the same, it is still going over the power limit.

The source for the first pic was PCPER

Here's another from Tom's Hardware showing the same thing. The 480 should be under 66W on the 12V rail, but it is at 68 even in compatibility mode.

That's why the 480 is not PCI certified and never will be.

>>56122799
A few people did some stress testing and found no issues with damaging even low end motherboards

>>56135845
Got a source for that?

>>56135845
You might want to read above you in the thread. There are plenty of cases of it not working or even damaging motherboards.

>>56135862
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LxiZqQVXuzA

Steve from gamers nexus also did a week long burn in, don't think he's put out the results yet, mentioned in another video the system was fine even with the launch drivers

>>56126039
That guy is literally retarded

AMD apologists are worse than macfags when it comes to being irrational. They eat up whatever misleading bullshit AMD craps out.

>>56135906
>don't think he's put out the results ye
How do you know the results ("found no issues") then?

>>56135973
Tripfags are even worse than macfags

>>56136128
Because he's a delusional AMDtard who isn't even interested in the facts.