I want to record everything that happens between this chick I'm

>>56122064
That's pretty sleezy shit man.

Just do what Dennis does on it's always Sunny.

>>56122064
Yeah, it's sleezy, but who the fuck would wanna be falsely accused of rape? Having some kind of log is better than nothing at all. Women get away with this type of stuff way too easily

You probably shouldn't be fucking someone who you suspect might perjure themselves about such a thing.

Yeah that's pretty fucking paranoid.
You probably shouldn't be dating a girl if you think she'd do that.

>>56122076
This wouldn't be for jacking off. This is just insurance. I don't need any ball-only angles.

>>56122081
Thats why I'm conflicted on this.

>>56122083
The problem is shes super liberal and we kinda haven't gotten to know eachother super well, we've hung out only a few times and typically its just a movie and then sex

My computer is always on - is there a software way to record audio for maybe 3-4 hours that won't max out a HDD? Possibly one that minimizes to tray

I'm pretty sure the prosecution could get the audio evidence thrown out easily.

Also I'm pretty sure that constitutes voyeurism, which is another sex crime.

>>56122105
Voyeurism is a "visual recording", so audio-only doesn't count

Sweet.

>>56122092
>you shouldn't be fucking someone you suspect might accuse you of rape
>yeah well she's liberal and I don't know her well and we still fuck

>maybe don't do dangerous thing
>let me explain. I'm doing that exact dangerous thing

>>56122092
>record audio for maybe 3-4 hours that won't max out a HDD?
lol nope
any computer is capable of compressing audio in realtime
5 minutes of audio at 96 kb/s would maybe occupy 2MB

Many US states are 2-party states, meaning both people would need to consent to the recording before it could be considered admissible evidence in a court.

>>56122064

In Utah its legal, only one party to a conversation has to be aware of the recording, check your local laws, some states it is very illegal.

>>56122149
The game is rigged

>>56122133
Theres also the secondary issue of not really being able to trust someone fully even if you've known them for months/years

Lets say you're dating a girl and you dump her one day and she decides to enact revenge by completely fucking ruining your life. its happened to guys in the past.

>>56122149
I'm Canadian and it looks like its only an offense if you're recording another party's communications, not your own with another person

http://www.legaltree.ca/node/908

>>56122083
>>56122090

So don't date anyone at all?

>>56122176
don't date western women you cuck

>>56122180
Some guys just prefer white women

>>56122181
then enjoy your rape charges

>>56122064
Check your state laws, first. In some you need consent from both parties to record.

Document everything.

This might be extreme, but if you have any worry at all, avoid taking any kind of alcohol or drugs with her.

>>56122217
>avoid taking any kind of alcohol or drugs with her.
We're both pretty straight edge and in Canada what I'm doing (audio-only) would be legal

I just need some kind of covert audio recording software that minimizes to tray or remains hidden, and can record long lengths of audio without maxing out a hard drive (3-4 hours)

>>56122229
Three to four hours of audio isn't going to "max out a hard drive" no matter what you're using.
You really can't just google "audio recording software" yourself?

if you feel a woman would accuse you of rape, why would have sex with them?

What do you intend to gain?
I'm sure you wouldn't want to pursue a long term relationship with this person. You'd be living in fear that she'd find out.

>>56122263
Audacity doesn't minimize to tray

That is pretty much the only audio software I can think of

>>56122274
I don't think she will, but you can't trust liberal chicks. They could easily be super SJW crazy bitches and you wouldn't know if they're smart

>>56122169
http://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/recording-phone-calls-and-conversations


>Eleven states require the consent of every party to a phone call or conversation in order to make the recording lawful. These "two-party consent" laws have been adopted in California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Washington.

>(Notes: (1) Illinois' two-party consent statute was held unconstitutional in 2014; (2) Hawai'i is in general a one-party state, but requires two-party consent if the recording device is installed in a private place; (3) Massachusetts bans "secret" recordings rather than requiring explicit consent from all parties.). Although they are referred to as "two-party consent" laws, consent must be obtained from every party to a phone call or conversation if it involves more than two people. In some of these states, it might be enough if all parties to the call or conversation know that you are recording and proceed with the communication anyway, even if they do not voice explicit consent. See the State Law: Recording section of this legal guide for information on specific states' wiretapping laws.

>>56122284
>These "two-party consent" laws

Why do these laws even exist?
They only exist to prevent you from taking legal action.

>>56122284
Read the rest of the post you're quoting

>>56122229
try this
http://superuser.com/questions/837550/how-to-hide-sound-recorder-in-windows-7

>>56122293
They're to prevent invasions of privacy.

>>56122306
Oh shit this is perfect

Thank you so much

>>56122310
wait, if someone admits to a crime over the phone in a 2-party state and you take the recording to the police, they'll just throw it out because the other guy didn't consent?

>>56122326

It could not be used as evidence in a court of law.

The police could go ahead and decide to investigate the person in question and hopefully find some admissible evidence.

>>56122064
Do you really think this girl would accuse you of rape, and take you to court for it? Court fees aren't cheap, and neither is hiring a lawyer. Don't be so paranoid man, she isn't going to do it.

>>56122064
honestly if you can't trust her don't fuck her

>>56122274
>if you feel a woman would accuse you of rape, why would have sex with them

Every modern woman will accuse a man of rape easily, this shit happens all the time. You can never be too careful. These bitches can never be trusted.

>>56122428
Uhhh do you even understand how the law works?

If she accuses him of a crime, the state prosecutes him.

>>56122428
All it takes is a rape accusation to ruin a man's life. And she won't pay a dime or face any charges. It's fucked.

>dating western women

>>56122149
If you have a recording that proves its consensual it will never go to court. Even if it is illegal to have recorded such proof.

I actually want a similar software solution but just as general audio surveillance.

>>56122750
>consensual
doesn't mean shit when women can rescind consent because they felt guilty and they don't want people to think they're a slut

>>56122293
They exist to cancel out whistle blowers, if your proof isn't legal then you can't blow the whistle.

>>56122284
>tfw I recorded altercation between two friends without their knowledge
>could have literally walked into police station and had one arrested because he laid hands on her, she had mark and I had audio recording
>his reaction to the existence of recording "I didn't know I was being recorded"

>>56122793
the audio isn't admissible evidence
the bruises and testimony would be tho

>>56122793
If not in a two party state and you were in the conversation than its legal. If you were not in the conversation but would have heard it naturally anyway other laws may apply.

>>56122064
>am I being paranoid?
Yes, you fucking neckbeard.

>>56122779
That may work at congress hearings if you're Anita hill or on tv news cycles if you're accusing Cosby but police won't fuck with it.

>>56122823
all she would have to do is claim that she was drunk or under the influence
it's your word against hers and legally you cannot consent when intoxicated

if i put cameras up in my own house and dont tell anyone, is that legal?

>>56122805
>admissible evidence

Have you ever dealt with the popo? It doesn't matter if it is or isn't admissible in court, they will investigate based on your word, they will believe your word because you got a fucking recording, evidence will be discovered later, they will settle out of court.

>>56122837
Yes

>>56122837
No.

>>56122837
Maybe

>>56122837
>>56122856

>>56122282
http://superuser.com/questions/548071/how-to-record-sound-24-7

>>56122105
No DA would be stupid enough to put you on trial for rape, get destroyed in court by video evidence, then charge you for "voyeurism" for producing said evidence. Even if they got you convicted on that, your civil suit against them for harassment would be in the tens of millions.

>>56122893
The real answer is. It depends on what jurisdiction you live in.

Recording like that are useless in court due to wiretapping laws. If you don't trust her, don't fuck her.

Also helps if you're not into weird kinky shit.

>>56122928
does anime kigurumi vacuum fetish count as kinky?

>>56122064

How about, if you can't trust someone, you don't fuck them?

I mean, it seems pretty fucking simple to me. I wouldn't smoke a bowl of weed with someone if I was paranoid they'd call the cops on me. I wouldn't call a friend a nigger if I was afraid he'd sue me for a hate crime. I wouldn't tell a coworker I was bullshitting my punch times if I was worried they'd tell HR. Why would I fuck someone if I was even remotely paranoid they'd call Rape?

>>56122954
Relationships change bud. People change. Sometimes trust just isn't enough.

>>56123008
then maybe you shouldn't give them a reason to charge you with rape

>>56122083
>>56122090
>>56122133
>>56122180
>>56122274
>>56122428
>>56122954

>women can be trusted

You either never dealt with women or you're really naive.

>>56123044
again


>dating western women

>>56123022
Sometimes people are irrational and do shitty things without reason. Who knew?

>>56122092

>record audio for maybe 3-4 hours that won't max out a HDD?

Nigger it won't even take 100 MB.

>>56122810
Those are the details that I don't get. How is it that there are so many laws about person to person recording either audio or video, but a business can record you without any regard to any rules they are free to do with those what they want including release them to police or media.

Not to mention that it is legal for employers to audio record their employees in their work environment as well as record all activities on company computer and phone calls on company phones.

But if I record a conversation between me and a friend without telling that friend, I'm breaking the law.

>>56123051
as opposed to? If you live in a "western" country, then all women, regardless of where they come from, are "western" women.

Check what the laws in your country/state say about recording conversations and the like with the consent on a single party (you), some places will allow you to record what goes on in your premises no matter who's in attendance.

My advice would be to do it only if it's legal, if it's not in your state then the video captured is likely going to be useless in court and you're just gonna end up incriminating yourself.

You could probably set up security cameras in the house if you own the property or have permission from the landlord. Even if they're concealed you could state that they're legal for the purposes of monitoring for break-ins and the like and that any footage captured of you banging/ being accused of raping someone is incidental.

Just record with your phone, quality is good enough, file size is small and it doesn't look suspicious to have your phone out near you all the time. That's what i do.

And don't listen to those bluepill retards.

"You shouldn't be having sex with someone you don't trust" and all that cosmopolitan bullcrap, I guarantee you they've fucked 5 girls max in their life or they're with their sweet, perfect ugly GF who's never gonna betray them, no no.

Women have no honor or loyalty. Protect yourself.

Even if it's illegal in your state (and you have to consider you do it i your property), if you're falsely accused of rape, you'll look better with an illegal recording charge than a rape charge. This will always discredit her.

>>56122064
did he died?

>>56122064
>and I

You mean and me.

>>56122064
Alright, I'm going to assume you're fucking a prostitute or an escort and you're just really fucking paranoid man. Or some bat shit crazy chick, and in that case, DON"T FUCK HER.

Always record in a public/private place when you're with a stranger, acquaintance or woman.

The recording may not be legal but the legal transcript of the events obviously copied from memory will be.

Good job on having self agency.

what the fuck is wrong with you people

>>56122118
No, audio only is wire tapping and a hardcore felony.

My god 72 replies for such an easy thing
OP, don't fuck her if you don't trust her at this point but if you're so hopeless that she's the only one for you in the world just buy this
https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00FPI1HQ8/ref=mp_s_a_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1471432013&sr=8-3&pi=AC_SX236_SY340_FMwebp_QL65&keywords=audio+recorder
And hide it. That's it.

>>56122837
I don't know.

>>56122229
Audacity you fucking idiot. Install, record, fuck.

>>56122064
> happens between this chick I'm fucking and I
Pablo, stop.

>>56122837
>asking for legal advice on 4chan

Really?

Just going to leave this here, for anyone doubting you should be recording shit.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/fifty-shades-of-grey-50-shades-false-rape-claim-false-accusation-incest-rape-a7189786.html

>>56122832
>legally you cannot consent when intoxicated
I've always wondered, does this apply to both parties or only to the female?

Because it seems ridiculous to me that 2 people not in a state to consent can have sex, but then only one of them is entitled to call it rape later: if we were both drunk, we're both rapists.

>>56122954
There is literally not a single woman in an Anglo country that you can trust. They are indoctrinated from a very young age to see men as the enemy so that's how they see you.

dont fuck

>>56125510
Nah man, that's just your patriarchal privilege talking.

Get a NanoPi M1 for ~20€, 8gb micro SD card for ~10€ and you're good to go

>>56125510
It applies to both males and females, but given the sorry state the prosecution of male rape is in. It's usually used in cases of female rape.

arecord -f cd -t raw | lame -r - bitch.mp3

>>56125741
Also if its in your room and not in a public area its legal to record video and audio without telling anyone.

>there are people who don't fap frequently in order to suppress any sexual urges
>there are people on /g/ who would actually trust a woman

what is wrong with you guys? i thought we're on 4chan?

>>56125711
I was dragged into a basement by a fat bitch when I was stumbling drunk and she had my pants off and was giving me a hand job.

Before I even knew what was happening she was bucking around and I was trying to shove her off because I was going to blow my load and she tried to grind into me and fought.

Barely got it out in time and I came so hard it ricocheted off her tit and hit me in the face.

>>56124580
He could always just say he left the recording software going by accident

All you need is a sign on the main entrances that says "notice: campus under video and audio surveillance" to be free and clear. If she asks just say it's to ward off unsavory gun nuts or something liberals would quickly nod their head to.

>>56122229
RB Tray puts every program you like to tray on windows (which I assume you exclusively use because of your retardation)

>>56123079
Did you ever read the EULA?
You're giving them the consent.

>>56125250
this

>>56125457
Audacity wouldn't have helped the father in that case.

File: 1465475650782.jpg (29KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 600x450px

>>56122064
>being straight
>in 2016
You will soon find that men are superior

>>56125839
Why did you rape her anon?

>>56123051
kys

>>56127226
I fucking wish I was gay.
Seriously.

>>56127348
>anon wants to suck that dick
>dat pussy thou

File: 1467634989980.jpg (15KB, 450x300px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 450x300px

>>56127368
>want to fuck women
>but also want the comforting embrace of a man
How does a man choose?

>muh recording is illegal
are you people fucking retarded? my guess is that even if it can not be used as evidence and the recordings are illegal, it would still be useful.

>>56122105
>voyeurism

Not if you live in a state with good wiretapping laws. In Texas, for example, only one involved party needs to consent to a recording, so you can't record other people without their consent, but you can record yourself with someone else.

>>56128279
>it would still be useful
how exactly?

>>56128279
If the recordings are illegal they are not admissible in court, and therefore not useful.

>>56122326
Yes, because it's illegal to tap phone conversations unless you are carrying out a legal investigation

>>56128519
>>56128530
last resort measure, play the relevant parts very loud in the courts. better than risking and years in prison, isn't it?

>>56124580
If it's in your own home you can record whatever you want however you want. If you couldn't then businesses wouldn't have security cameras

>normalfags

lol this is why im into dudes

Gay master race here.

>Disregard women.
>Profit.

>>56128761
I wish I was gay. Is there a way to become gay?

>>56129103
start off with feminime men then work your way down

>>56122837
Can you repeat the question?

>>56127903
It's more like
>attracted to women
>Hate dealing with bullshit and drama that comes with women

>>56122064
Check your laws before doing that. In my country you cannot record sound or video without consent if intruding in privacy. Fucking would be considered private so that is effectively illegal. You can get up to 2 years :(

>>56122064
Best way of not having her accuse you of tape is not to fucking rape her you shitlord

>>56128632
Contempt of court and a mistrial.

Just leave your phone slash tablet slash pc in the vicinity and the nsa has got your back

>>56130000
just remember to say the trigger word / sentence and they will automatically record it for you

>>56129960
Life isn't an episode of Law and Order dickwad. Your evidence even if illegal to use in court will be used to establish your word against hers in a police station where she will be promptly kicked out of after you prove she's making it up.

>>56129960
at least they would know that they imprisoned a innocent person for the wrong reasons.

btw, OT... if that happened to me (being jailed mistakenly), I'd be sure to take revenge against every single person involved in the case.

>>56129103
Buy a Mac. Buh-dum tiss.

>>56122064
get all the evidence you can, if push comes to shove you can always hire a lawyer and ask if the evidence can be used.

Next time i will buy some glasses.

>>56130248
I was expecting that answer, but I'd rather not have sex ever again than use such a terrible device.

Also none of the gaybros I know have Macs, only the numales.

>>56128519
>>56128530
>Upload recordings far and wide on the internet
>tell your story on Reddit, etc.

Even if you get done for contempt or court for publishing information that could affect the outcome of an ongoing trial, your innocence is established far more in the public consciousness. (Provided you can play the recording off as accidental.)

File: sad-facebook-frog.jpg (114KB, 1252x1252px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 1252x1252px

>>56128761
>tfw you aren't gay and have to put up with horrible modern women just to get your sexual needs met

Feels bad man.

>>56132258
no here's what happens
people look up your name on google and it shows up next to the word RAPE CHARGES
maybe you'll find the AMA on reddit on page 5 if you're lucky

>>56127348

If you think being gay helps you escape the problems of women, oh boy do you have another thing coming.

Especially if you're into fem boys, they're worse than women in every single way.

>>56124590
>what is a smartphone

>>56127368
this is actually my problem though, i really like sucking dick but haven't learned to like everything else about men, so i still almost exclusively look at women

>>56132318
just jack off mang

>>56122064
>>56133628
>>>/jp/onahole
problem solved

>To be this legally cucked in murrica that any women could simply get away with false rape charges

Well my boy, first it has happened a few times, get some less creepy evidence like witness that aren't your average neckbeard friends. You seem pretty beta yourself so you're prone to be manipulated easily. I would try to seek a better women and cut the crazy bitch loose.

Never stick your dick on the crazy womens and if you absolutely must then try to not make it more than twice

>>56122229
>Canada

Give up now. You better know how to speak French too. Those people have the highest chance of trying to fuck you over and your president is a total bitch.

Use OBS settings allow tray recording of video and screen in any case you could say you were Messing up with it to make a let's play youtube video or something

>>56122954
>How about, if you can't trust someone, you don't fuck them?
>If you can't trust a woman not to divorce you, why get married?
>If you can't trust a company not to fire you, why work there?

I can think of a few others. Your reasoning is retarded. You fuck them because it's part of the human experience. Recording the audio is just a safeguard against false rape accusations, which constitute anywhere between 8(!) and 50+ percent of all cases brought to court.

Think about that. At MINIMUM, 8% of rape accusations are false. A little under 1 in 10. No other crime comes anywhere *close* to that level of false accusations.

>>56130209
Are you retarded? Inadmissible evidence isn't allowed into court in the first place, and if evidence is found to be inadmissible the jury is either asked to ignore it (very explicitly, "Do not consider X article of evidence when considering guilt") or a new trial is conducted. Believe me, it'd be nice in cases like this but keeping illegally collected evidence out of court has protected far more people than it's hurt. ie cops busting into a house without a warrant and planting evidence of drugs, child porn, etc.

>>56134026
>Never stick your dick on the crazy
And unless there are huge red flags like multiple children from different partners or a past case of false accusation, you have no clue who is crazy and who isn't. Just ask divorced men and women. It might not show up for years.

Replies aside, OP you should absolutely investigate this more. Check that you're in a single party consent state. If you aren't, the recording won't do you much good if you're falsely accused.

>>56122064
There's always the option of abstaining from relationships in order to deny women the only power they have over you.

>>56134591
Women are the genetic gatekeepers.
If you don't play their game, they win.

>>56134636
some guy was wearing safety goggles and they saved his vision.

>>56134428
Did you even read the comment you replied to? No one said anything about taking illegal evidence to court, what I said was, any evidence even if inadmissible/illegal will save your ass at the police station and it will never go to court in the first place.

>>56134822
Yeah, could be right. Better to have it than not, I guess. A wiretapping charge would certainly bring less issue than a rape charge.

>>56135062
>wiretapping charge

Public prosecutors in the United States are elected by the public, wiretapping charges don't get you votes, child porn cases and rape cases do, those are the incentives you're dealing with, so more often than not, your word vs the word of a woman who claims to be raped, guess who they're going to listen to.

If you have a tape that proves otherwise, you're free, no prosecutor would even think of retaliatory charges against you and the case wouldn't even reach him if you show up at the police station with the evidence.

>>56135062
>>56135101
Recording audio isn't wiretapping you fucking mongs. If you record audio from your own private space i.e. your bedroom, its 100% legal and admissible in court and depending on the state you live in you don't even need to tell people you are recording.

>>56122837
install gentoo

>>56124580

depends on the state.

a lot of states have laws stating conversations may be recorded if one side is aware its being recorded.

>>56135151
It literally depends on where you live, in some states you are not allowed to record a conversation without consent of the other person, it doesn't specify if that's in public or private propriety so it applies to all spaces, some states don't have laws on it, so it really depends.

File: .jpg (7KB, 233x216px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 233x216px

>>56123044

>>56122176


kek

>>56122837
Depends where you live

>>56122263
maybe he wants to record in FLAC

Just lay out your fancy clothes like Anderson Cooper and hide the GoPro in your suit jacket pocket. Then post the video on the web so then we can live out your sex life vicariously.